The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/148812 |
Resumo: | Background Sulfonylureas are an effective and inexpensive treatment for type 2 diabetes. There is conflicting data about the safety of these drugs regarding mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the safety of the sulfonylureas most frequently used and to use trial sequential analysis (TSA) to analyze whether the available sample was powered enough to support the results. Methods and Findings Electronic databases were reviewed from1946 (Embase) or 1966 (MEDLINE) up to 31 December 2014. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of at least 52 wk in duration evaluating second- or third-generation sulfonylureas in the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes and reporting outcomes of interest were included. Primary outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, myocardial infarction and stroke events were evaluated. Data were summarized with Peto odds ratios (ORs), and the reliability of the results was evaluated with TSA. Forty-seven RCTs with 37,650 patients and 890 deaths in total were included. Sulfonylureas were not associated with all-cause (OR 1.12 [95%CI 0.96 to 1.30]) or cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.12 [95%CI 0.87 to 1.42]). Sulfonylureas were also not associated with increased risk ofmyocardial infarction (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.76 to 1.12]) or stroke (OR 1.16 [95% CI 0.81 to 1.66]). TSA could discard an absolute difference of 0.5% between the treatments, which was considered theminimal clinically significant difference. Themajor limitation of this review was the inclusion of studies not designed to evaluate safety outcomes. Conclusions Sulfonylureas are not associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Current evidence supports the safety of sulfonylureas; an absolute risk of 0.5% could be firmly discarded. |
id |
UFRGS-2_5c9d5482a78d214117867346b4744124 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/148812 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Rados, Dimitris Rucks VarvakiPinto, Lana Catani FerreiraRemonti, Luciana Loss ReckLeitão, Cristiane BauermannGross, Jorge Luiz2016-10-04T02:16:27Z20161549-1676http://hdl.handle.net/10183/148812000998484Background Sulfonylureas are an effective and inexpensive treatment for type 2 diabetes. There is conflicting data about the safety of these drugs regarding mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the safety of the sulfonylureas most frequently used and to use trial sequential analysis (TSA) to analyze whether the available sample was powered enough to support the results. Methods and Findings Electronic databases were reviewed from1946 (Embase) or 1966 (MEDLINE) up to 31 December 2014. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of at least 52 wk in duration evaluating second- or third-generation sulfonylureas in the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes and reporting outcomes of interest were included. Primary outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, myocardial infarction and stroke events were evaluated. Data were summarized with Peto odds ratios (ORs), and the reliability of the results was evaluated with TSA. Forty-seven RCTs with 37,650 patients and 890 deaths in total were included. Sulfonylureas were not associated with all-cause (OR 1.12 [95%CI 0.96 to 1.30]) or cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.12 [95%CI 0.87 to 1.42]). Sulfonylureas were also not associated with increased risk ofmyocardial infarction (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.76 to 1.12]) or stroke (OR 1.16 [95% CI 0.81 to 1.66]). TSA could discard an absolute difference of 0.5% between the treatments, which was considered theminimal clinically significant difference. Themajor limitation of this review was the inclusion of studies not designed to evaluate safety outcomes. Conclusions Sulfonylureas are not associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Current evidence supports the safety of sulfonylureas; an absolute risk of 0.5% could be firmly discarded.application/pdfengPLoS Medicine. San Francisco. Vol. 13, no. 4 (2016), e1001992, 22 f.Doenças cardiovascularesCompostos de sulfoniluréiaThe association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trialsEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000998484.pdf000998484.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf2877590http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/148812/1/000998484.pdf1bfba92db46e16c82845e5c7d0d02bd4MD51TEXT000998484.pdf.txt000998484.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain71507http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/148812/2/000998484.pdf.txt03421544f741b9ac27c45c1441a38b05MD52THUMBNAIL000998484.pdf.jpg000998484.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2026http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/148812/3/000998484.pdf.jpg1b0c587be9698e506634c73b4c44af64MD5310183/1488122023-05-21 03:27:34.123413oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/148812Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-05-21T06:27:34Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title |
The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials |
spellingShingle |
The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials Rados, Dimitris Rucks Varvaki Doenças cardiovasculares Compostos de sulfoniluréia |
title_short |
The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_full |
The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_fullStr |
The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_full_unstemmed |
The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials |
title_sort |
The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials |
author |
Rados, Dimitris Rucks Varvaki |
author_facet |
Rados, Dimitris Rucks Varvaki Pinto, Lana Catani Ferreira Remonti, Luciana Loss Reck Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann Gross, Jorge Luiz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pinto, Lana Catani Ferreira Remonti, Luciana Loss Reck Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann Gross, Jorge Luiz |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rados, Dimitris Rucks Varvaki Pinto, Lana Catani Ferreira Remonti, Luciana Loss Reck Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann Gross, Jorge Luiz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Doenças cardiovasculares Compostos de sulfoniluréia |
topic |
Doenças cardiovasculares Compostos de sulfoniluréia |
description |
Background Sulfonylureas are an effective and inexpensive treatment for type 2 diabetes. There is conflicting data about the safety of these drugs regarding mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the safety of the sulfonylureas most frequently used and to use trial sequential analysis (TSA) to analyze whether the available sample was powered enough to support the results. Methods and Findings Electronic databases were reviewed from1946 (Embase) or 1966 (MEDLINE) up to 31 December 2014. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of at least 52 wk in duration evaluating second- or third-generation sulfonylureas in the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes and reporting outcomes of interest were included. Primary outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, myocardial infarction and stroke events were evaluated. Data were summarized with Peto odds ratios (ORs), and the reliability of the results was evaluated with TSA. Forty-seven RCTs with 37,650 patients and 890 deaths in total were included. Sulfonylureas were not associated with all-cause (OR 1.12 [95%CI 0.96 to 1.30]) or cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.12 [95%CI 0.87 to 1.42]). Sulfonylureas were also not associated with increased risk ofmyocardial infarction (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.76 to 1.12]) or stroke (OR 1.16 [95% CI 0.81 to 1.66]). TSA could discard an absolute difference of 0.5% between the treatments, which was considered theminimal clinically significant difference. Themajor limitation of this review was the inclusion of studies not designed to evaluate safety outcomes. Conclusions Sulfonylureas are not associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Current evidence supports the safety of sulfonylureas; an absolute risk of 0.5% could be firmly discarded. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-04T02:16:27Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2016 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/148812 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1549-1676 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
000998484 |
identifier_str_mv |
1549-1676 000998484 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/148812 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
PLoS Medicine. San Francisco. Vol. 13, no. 4 (2016), e1001992, 22 f. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/148812/1/000998484.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/148812/2/000998484.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/148812/3/000998484.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
1bfba92db46e16c82845e5c7d0d02bd4 03421544f741b9ac27c45c1441a38b05 1b0c587be9698e506634c73b4c44af64 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447622784122880 |