The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rados, Dimitris Rucks Varvaki
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Pinto, Lana Catani Ferreira, Remonti, Luciana Loss Reck, Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann, Gross, Jorge Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/148812
Resumo: Background Sulfonylureas are an effective and inexpensive treatment for type 2 diabetes. There is conflicting data about the safety of these drugs regarding mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the safety of the sulfonylureas most frequently used and to use trial sequential analysis (TSA) to analyze whether the available sample was powered enough to support the results. Methods and Findings Electronic databases were reviewed from1946 (Embase) or 1966 (MEDLINE) up to 31 December 2014. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of at least 52 wk in duration evaluating second- or third-generation sulfonylureas in the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes and reporting outcomes of interest were included. Primary outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, myocardial infarction and stroke events were evaluated. Data were summarized with Peto odds ratios (ORs), and the reliability of the results was evaluated with TSA. Forty-seven RCTs with 37,650 patients and 890 deaths in total were included. Sulfonylureas were not associated with all-cause (OR 1.12 [95%CI 0.96 to 1.30]) or cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.12 [95%CI 0.87 to 1.42]). Sulfonylureas were also not associated with increased risk ofmyocardial infarction (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.76 to 1.12]) or stroke (OR 1.16 [95% CI 0.81 to 1.66]). TSA could discard an absolute difference of 0.5% between the treatments, which was considered theminimal clinically significant difference. Themajor limitation of this review was the inclusion of studies not designed to evaluate safety outcomes. Conclusions Sulfonylureas are not associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Current evidence supports the safety of sulfonylureas; an absolute risk of 0.5% could be firmly discarded.
id UFRGS-2_5c9d5482a78d214117867346b4744124
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/148812
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Rados, Dimitris Rucks VarvakiPinto, Lana Catani FerreiraRemonti, Luciana Loss ReckLeitão, Cristiane BauermannGross, Jorge Luiz2016-10-04T02:16:27Z20161549-1676http://hdl.handle.net/10183/148812000998484Background Sulfonylureas are an effective and inexpensive treatment for type 2 diabetes. There is conflicting data about the safety of these drugs regarding mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the safety of the sulfonylureas most frequently used and to use trial sequential analysis (TSA) to analyze whether the available sample was powered enough to support the results. Methods and Findings Electronic databases were reviewed from1946 (Embase) or 1966 (MEDLINE) up to 31 December 2014. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of at least 52 wk in duration evaluating second- or third-generation sulfonylureas in the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes and reporting outcomes of interest were included. Primary outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, myocardial infarction and stroke events were evaluated. Data were summarized with Peto odds ratios (ORs), and the reliability of the results was evaluated with TSA. Forty-seven RCTs with 37,650 patients and 890 deaths in total were included. Sulfonylureas were not associated with all-cause (OR 1.12 [95%CI 0.96 to 1.30]) or cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.12 [95%CI 0.87 to 1.42]). Sulfonylureas were also not associated with increased risk ofmyocardial infarction (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.76 to 1.12]) or stroke (OR 1.16 [95% CI 0.81 to 1.66]). TSA could discard an absolute difference of 0.5% between the treatments, which was considered theminimal clinically significant difference. Themajor limitation of this review was the inclusion of studies not designed to evaluate safety outcomes. Conclusions Sulfonylureas are not associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Current evidence supports the safety of sulfonylureas; an absolute risk of 0.5% could be firmly discarded.application/pdfengPLoS Medicine. San Francisco. Vol. 13, no. 4 (2016), e1001992, 22 f.Doenças cardiovascularesCompostos de sulfoniluréiaThe association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trialsEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000998484.pdf000998484.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf2877590http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/148812/1/000998484.pdf1bfba92db46e16c82845e5c7d0d02bd4MD51TEXT000998484.pdf.txt000998484.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain71507http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/148812/2/000998484.pdf.txt03421544f741b9ac27c45c1441a38b05MD52THUMBNAIL000998484.pdf.jpg000998484.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2026http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/148812/3/000998484.pdf.jpg1b0c587be9698e506634c73b4c44af64MD5310183/1488122023-05-21 03:27:34.123413oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/148812Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-05-21T06:27:34Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials
title The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials
spellingShingle The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials
Rados, Dimitris Rucks Varvaki
Doenças cardiovasculares
Compostos de sulfoniluréia
title_short The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_full The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_fullStr The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials
title_sort The association between sulfonylurea use and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality : a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials
author Rados, Dimitris Rucks Varvaki
author_facet Rados, Dimitris Rucks Varvaki
Pinto, Lana Catani Ferreira
Remonti, Luciana Loss Reck
Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann
Gross, Jorge Luiz
author_role author
author2 Pinto, Lana Catani Ferreira
Remonti, Luciana Loss Reck
Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann
Gross, Jorge Luiz
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rados, Dimitris Rucks Varvaki
Pinto, Lana Catani Ferreira
Remonti, Luciana Loss Reck
Leitão, Cristiane Bauermann
Gross, Jorge Luiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Doenças cardiovasculares
Compostos de sulfoniluréia
topic Doenças cardiovasculares
Compostos de sulfoniluréia
description Background Sulfonylureas are an effective and inexpensive treatment for type 2 diabetes. There is conflicting data about the safety of these drugs regarding mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the safety of the sulfonylureas most frequently used and to use trial sequential analysis (TSA) to analyze whether the available sample was powered enough to support the results. Methods and Findings Electronic databases were reviewed from1946 (Embase) or 1966 (MEDLINE) up to 31 December 2014. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of at least 52 wk in duration evaluating second- or third-generation sulfonylureas in the treatment of adults with type 2 diabetes and reporting outcomes of interest were included. Primary outcomes were all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, myocardial infarction and stroke events were evaluated. Data were summarized with Peto odds ratios (ORs), and the reliability of the results was evaluated with TSA. Forty-seven RCTs with 37,650 patients and 890 deaths in total were included. Sulfonylureas were not associated with all-cause (OR 1.12 [95%CI 0.96 to 1.30]) or cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.12 [95%CI 0.87 to 1.42]). Sulfonylureas were also not associated with increased risk ofmyocardial infarction (OR 0.92 [95% CI 0.76 to 1.12]) or stroke (OR 1.16 [95% CI 0.81 to 1.66]). TSA could discard an absolute difference of 0.5% between the treatments, which was considered theminimal clinically significant difference. Themajor limitation of this review was the inclusion of studies not designed to evaluate safety outcomes. Conclusions Sulfonylureas are not associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Current evidence supports the safety of sulfonylureas; an absolute risk of 0.5% could be firmly discarded.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2016-10-04T02:16:27Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/148812
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1549-1676
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000998484
identifier_str_mv 1549-1676
000998484
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/148812
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv PLoS Medicine. San Francisco. Vol. 13, no. 4 (2016), e1001992, 22 f.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/148812/1/000998484.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/148812/2/000998484.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/148812/3/000998484.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 1bfba92db46e16c82845e5c7d0d02bd4
03421544f741b9ac27c45c1441a38b05
1b0c587be9698e506634c73b4c44af64
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224908476252160