Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Espírito Santo, Rafaela Cavalheiro do
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Fernandes, Kevin Zebrowski, Lora, Priscila Schmidt, Filippin, Lidiane Isabel, Xavier, Ricardo Machado
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199330
Resumo: Background: Low muscle mass occurs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis without weight loss; this condition is referred asrheumatoid cachexia. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine therheumatoid cachexia prevalence. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies published in English, between 1994 and 2016, wasconducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and other relevant sources. Search strategies were based on pre-defined keywordsand medical subject headings. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.Meta-analysis was used to estimate the prevalence, and because studies reported different methods and criteria to estimatebody composition and prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia, subgroup analyses were performed. Meta-regression adjusted forthe 28-joint disease activity score and disease duration (years) was performed (significance level atP≤0.05). Results: Of 136 full articles (one duplicate publication) screened for inclusion in the study, eight were included. The esti-mated overall prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia was 19% [95% confidence interval (CI) 07–33%]. This prevalence was 29%(95% CI 15–46%) when body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. When the diagnostic criteriawere fat-free mass index below the 10th percentile and fat mass index above the 25th percentile, rheumatoid cachexia prev-alence was 32% (95% CI 14–52%). The 28-joint disease activity score and disease duration had no influence on the estimatedprevalence of rheumatoid cachexia (P>0.05). Most studies were rated as having moderate methodological quality. Conclusions: Meta-analysis showed a prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia of 15-32%, according to different criteria, demon-strating that this condition is a frequent comorbidity of rheumatoid arthritis. To better understand its clinical impact, more studies using standardized definitions and prospective evaluations are urgently needed.
id UFRGS-2_6dd98816151b8f9b1f243fe6c5c59f2f
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/199330
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Espírito Santo, Rafaela Cavalheiro doFernandes, Kevin ZebrowskiLora, Priscila SchmidtFilippin, Lidiane IsabelXavier, Ricardo Machado2019-09-14T03:54:00Z20182190-6009http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199330001102297Background: Low muscle mass occurs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis without weight loss; this condition is referred asrheumatoid cachexia. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine therheumatoid cachexia prevalence. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies published in English, between 1994 and 2016, wasconducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and other relevant sources. Search strategies were based on pre-defined keywordsand medical subject headings. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.Meta-analysis was used to estimate the prevalence, and because studies reported different methods and criteria to estimatebody composition and prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia, subgroup analyses were performed. Meta-regression adjusted forthe 28-joint disease activity score and disease duration (years) was performed (significance level atP≤0.05). Results: Of 136 full articles (one duplicate publication) screened for inclusion in the study, eight were included. The esti-mated overall prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia was 19% [95% confidence interval (CI) 07–33%]. This prevalence was 29%(95% CI 15–46%) when body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. When the diagnostic criteriawere fat-free mass index below the 10th percentile and fat mass index above the 25th percentile, rheumatoid cachexia prev-alence was 32% (95% CI 14–52%). The 28-joint disease activity score and disease duration had no influence on the estimatedprevalence of rheumatoid cachexia (P>0.05). Most studies were rated as having moderate methodological quality. Conclusions: Meta-analysis showed a prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia of 15-32%, according to different criteria, demon-strating that this condition is a frequent comorbidity of rheumatoid arthritis. To better understand its clinical impact, more studies using standardized definitions and prospective evaluations are urgently needed.application/pdfengJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle. Berlin. Vol. 9, no. 5 (2018), p. 816–825CaquexiaSarcopeniaArtrite reumatóidePrevalênciaRevisão sistemáticaMetanáliseCachexiaRheumatoid cachexiaRheumatoid arthritisPrevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysisEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001102297.pdf.txt001102297.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain39384http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199330/2/001102297.pdf.txte89ed053f4995cede1b84b1042b81042MD52ORIGINAL001102297.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf652042http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199330/1/001102297.pdf3648d926731f3df4f655cc20dd8a461eMD5110183/1993302019-09-15 03:44:03.218642oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/199330Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2019-09-15T06:44:03Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis
Espírito Santo, Rafaela Cavalheiro do
Caquexia
Sarcopenia
Artrite reumatóide
Prevalência
Revisão sistemática
Metanálise
Cachexia
Rheumatoid cachexia
Rheumatoid arthritis
title_short Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis
author Espírito Santo, Rafaela Cavalheiro do
author_facet Espírito Santo, Rafaela Cavalheiro do
Fernandes, Kevin Zebrowski
Lora, Priscila Schmidt
Filippin, Lidiane Isabel
Xavier, Ricardo Machado
author_role author
author2 Fernandes, Kevin Zebrowski
Lora, Priscila Schmidt
Filippin, Lidiane Isabel
Xavier, Ricardo Machado
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Espírito Santo, Rafaela Cavalheiro do
Fernandes, Kevin Zebrowski
Lora, Priscila Schmidt
Filippin, Lidiane Isabel
Xavier, Ricardo Machado
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Caquexia
Sarcopenia
Artrite reumatóide
Prevalência
Revisão sistemática
Metanálise
topic Caquexia
Sarcopenia
Artrite reumatóide
Prevalência
Revisão sistemática
Metanálise
Cachexia
Rheumatoid cachexia
Rheumatoid arthritis
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Cachexia
Rheumatoid cachexia
Rheumatoid arthritis
description Background: Low muscle mass occurs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis without weight loss; this condition is referred asrheumatoid cachexia. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine therheumatoid cachexia prevalence. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies published in English, between 1994 and 2016, wasconducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and other relevant sources. Search strategies were based on pre-defined keywordsand medical subject headings. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.Meta-analysis was used to estimate the prevalence, and because studies reported different methods and criteria to estimatebody composition and prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia, subgroup analyses were performed. Meta-regression adjusted forthe 28-joint disease activity score and disease duration (years) was performed (significance level atP≤0.05). Results: Of 136 full articles (one duplicate publication) screened for inclusion in the study, eight were included. The esti-mated overall prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia was 19% [95% confidence interval (CI) 07–33%]. This prevalence was 29%(95% CI 15–46%) when body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. When the diagnostic criteriawere fat-free mass index below the 10th percentile and fat mass index above the 25th percentile, rheumatoid cachexia prev-alence was 32% (95% CI 14–52%). The 28-joint disease activity score and disease duration had no influence on the estimatedprevalence of rheumatoid cachexia (P>0.05). Most studies were rated as having moderate methodological quality. Conclusions: Meta-analysis showed a prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia of 15-32%, according to different criteria, demon-strating that this condition is a frequent comorbidity of rheumatoid arthritis. To better understand its clinical impact, more studies using standardized definitions and prospective evaluations are urgently needed.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-09-14T03:54:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199330
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2190-6009
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001102297
identifier_str_mv 2190-6009
001102297
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199330
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle. Berlin. Vol. 9, no. 5 (2018), p. 816–825
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199330/2/001102297.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199330/1/001102297.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e89ed053f4995cede1b84b1042b81042
3648d926731f3df4f655cc20dd8a461e
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1815447694806614016