Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199330 |
Resumo: | Background: Low muscle mass occurs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis without weight loss; this condition is referred asrheumatoid cachexia. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine therheumatoid cachexia prevalence. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies published in English, between 1994 and 2016, wasconducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and other relevant sources. Search strategies were based on pre-defined keywordsand medical subject headings. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.Meta-analysis was used to estimate the prevalence, and because studies reported different methods and criteria to estimatebody composition and prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia, subgroup analyses were performed. Meta-regression adjusted forthe 28-joint disease activity score and disease duration (years) was performed (significance level atP≤0.05). Results: Of 136 full articles (one duplicate publication) screened for inclusion in the study, eight were included. The esti-mated overall prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia was 19% [95% confidence interval (CI) 07–33%]. This prevalence was 29%(95% CI 15–46%) when body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. When the diagnostic criteriawere fat-free mass index below the 10th percentile and fat mass index above the 25th percentile, rheumatoid cachexia prev-alence was 32% (95% CI 14–52%). The 28-joint disease activity score and disease duration had no influence on the estimatedprevalence of rheumatoid cachexia (P>0.05). Most studies were rated as having moderate methodological quality. Conclusions: Meta-analysis showed a prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia of 15-32%, according to different criteria, demon-strating that this condition is a frequent comorbidity of rheumatoid arthritis. To better understand its clinical impact, more studies using standardized definitions and prospective evaluations are urgently needed. |
id |
UFRGS-2_6dd98816151b8f9b1f243fe6c5c59f2f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/199330 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Espírito Santo, Rafaela Cavalheiro doFernandes, Kevin ZebrowskiLora, Priscila SchmidtFilippin, Lidiane IsabelXavier, Ricardo Machado2019-09-14T03:54:00Z20182190-6009http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199330001102297Background: Low muscle mass occurs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis without weight loss; this condition is referred asrheumatoid cachexia. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine therheumatoid cachexia prevalence. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies published in English, between 1994 and 2016, wasconducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and other relevant sources. Search strategies were based on pre-defined keywordsand medical subject headings. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.Meta-analysis was used to estimate the prevalence, and because studies reported different methods and criteria to estimatebody composition and prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia, subgroup analyses were performed. Meta-regression adjusted forthe 28-joint disease activity score and disease duration (years) was performed (significance level atP≤0.05). Results: Of 136 full articles (one duplicate publication) screened for inclusion in the study, eight were included. The esti-mated overall prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia was 19% [95% confidence interval (CI) 07–33%]. This prevalence was 29%(95% CI 15–46%) when body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. When the diagnostic criteriawere fat-free mass index below the 10th percentile and fat mass index above the 25th percentile, rheumatoid cachexia prev-alence was 32% (95% CI 14–52%). The 28-joint disease activity score and disease duration had no influence on the estimatedprevalence of rheumatoid cachexia (P>0.05). Most studies were rated as having moderate methodological quality. Conclusions: Meta-analysis showed a prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia of 15-32%, according to different criteria, demon-strating that this condition is a frequent comorbidity of rheumatoid arthritis. To better understand its clinical impact, more studies using standardized definitions and prospective evaluations are urgently needed.application/pdfengJournal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle. Berlin. Vol. 9, no. 5 (2018), p. 816–825CaquexiaSarcopeniaArtrite reumatóidePrevalênciaRevisão sistemáticaMetanáliseCachexiaRheumatoid cachexiaRheumatoid arthritisPrevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysisEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001102297.pdf.txt001102297.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain39384http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199330/2/001102297.pdf.txte89ed053f4995cede1b84b1042b81042MD52ORIGINAL001102297.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf652042http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199330/1/001102297.pdf3648d926731f3df4f655cc20dd8a461eMD5110183/1993302019-09-15 03:44:03.218642oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/199330Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2019-09-15T06:44:03Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis Espírito Santo, Rafaela Cavalheiro do Caquexia Sarcopenia Artrite reumatóide Prevalência Revisão sistemática Metanálise Cachexia Rheumatoid cachexia Rheumatoid arthritis |
title_short |
Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia in rheumatoid arthritis : a systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Espírito Santo, Rafaela Cavalheiro do |
author_facet |
Espírito Santo, Rafaela Cavalheiro do Fernandes, Kevin Zebrowski Lora, Priscila Schmidt Filippin, Lidiane Isabel Xavier, Ricardo Machado |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fernandes, Kevin Zebrowski Lora, Priscila Schmidt Filippin, Lidiane Isabel Xavier, Ricardo Machado |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Espírito Santo, Rafaela Cavalheiro do Fernandes, Kevin Zebrowski Lora, Priscila Schmidt Filippin, Lidiane Isabel Xavier, Ricardo Machado |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Caquexia Sarcopenia Artrite reumatóide Prevalência Revisão sistemática Metanálise |
topic |
Caquexia Sarcopenia Artrite reumatóide Prevalência Revisão sistemática Metanálise Cachexia Rheumatoid cachexia Rheumatoid arthritis |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Cachexia Rheumatoid cachexia Rheumatoid arthritis |
description |
Background: Low muscle mass occurs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis without weight loss; this condition is referred asrheumatoid cachexia. The aim of the current study was to perform a systematic review with meta-analysis to determine therheumatoid cachexia prevalence. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies published in English, between 1994 and 2016, wasconducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and other relevant sources. Search strategies were based on pre-defined keywordsand medical subject headings. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.Meta-analysis was used to estimate the prevalence, and because studies reported different methods and criteria to estimatebody composition and prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia, subgroup analyses were performed. Meta-regression adjusted forthe 28-joint disease activity score and disease duration (years) was performed (significance level atP≤0.05). Results: Of 136 full articles (one duplicate publication) screened for inclusion in the study, eight were included. The esti-mated overall prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia was 19% [95% confidence interval (CI) 07–33%]. This prevalence was 29%(95% CI 15–46%) when body composition was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. When the diagnostic criteriawere fat-free mass index below the 10th percentile and fat mass index above the 25th percentile, rheumatoid cachexia prev-alence was 32% (95% CI 14–52%). The 28-joint disease activity score and disease duration had no influence on the estimatedprevalence of rheumatoid cachexia (P>0.05). Most studies were rated as having moderate methodological quality. Conclusions: Meta-analysis showed a prevalence of rheumatoid cachexia of 15-32%, according to different criteria, demon-strating that this condition is a frequent comorbidity of rheumatoid arthritis. To better understand its clinical impact, more studies using standardized definitions and prospective evaluations are urgently needed. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2019-09-14T03:54:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199330 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
2190-6009 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001102297 |
identifier_str_mv |
2190-6009 001102297 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/199330 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle. Berlin. Vol. 9, no. 5 (2018), p. 816–825 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199330/2/001102297.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/199330/1/001102297.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
e89ed053f4995cede1b84b1042b81042 3648d926731f3df4f655cc20dd8a461e |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447694806614016 |