Comparison of CALMET and WRF/CALMET coupling for dispersion of NO2 and SO2 using CALPUFF modelling system

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schramm, Juliana
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Degrazia, Franco Caldas, Vilhena, Marco Tullio Menna Barreto de, Bodmann, Bardo Ernst Josef
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/189243
Resumo: This study aims to compare the wind and concentration field generated by a coupling of WRF/CALMET model and CALMET/CALPUFF with no introduction of any gridded wind field. The domain was located at the city of Linhares, southeast region of Brazil, with a 15×15 grid cells and 1 km resolution. The chosen modelling period was April 1st, 2011, with the length of 90 h. The pollutants simulated by CALPUFF were NO2 and SO2. The final results of dispersion and concentration peak were compared against environmental legislation of 1 h average for NO2 and 24 h average for SO2. The first simulation, using WRF/CALMET model, shows plausible results. The second mode, CALMET/CALPUFF, generated a wind field with questionable results, which probably compromised the dispersion simulation. Both model results are within environmental legislation.
id UFRGS-2_76fa685c0b6fdc75949d4173f3b6e7d2
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/189243
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Schramm, JulianaDegrazia, Franco CaldasVilhena, Marco Tullio Menna Barreto deBodmann, Bardo Ernst Josef2019-03-02T02:31:41Z20162166-465Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/189243001009954This study aims to compare the wind and concentration field generated by a coupling of WRF/CALMET model and CALMET/CALPUFF with no introduction of any gridded wind field. The domain was located at the city of Linhares, southeast region of Brazil, with a 15×15 grid cells and 1 km resolution. The chosen modelling period was April 1st, 2011, with the length of 90 h. The pollutants simulated by CALPUFF were NO2 and SO2. The final results of dispersion and concentration peak were compared against environmental legislation of 1 h average for NO2 and 24 h average for SO2. The first simulation, using WRF/CALMET model, shows plausible results. The second mode, CALMET/CALPUFF, generated a wind field with questionable results, which probably compromised the dispersion simulation. Both model results are within environmental legislation.application/pdfengAmerican Journal of Environmental Engineering [recurso eletrônico]. Rosemead. Vol. 6, no. 4A (016), p. 50-55Dispersão de poluentesModelos matemáticosWRFCALPUFFDispersionModelBrazilComparison of CALMET and WRF/CALMET coupling for dispersion of NO2 and SO2 using CALPUFF modelling systemEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001009954.pdf.txt001009954.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain22033http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/189243/2/001009954.pdf.txtf80638c6d94f2548f604f841deb12282MD52ORIGINAL001009954.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf409518http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/189243/1/001009954.pdfa43e78d4c5b0e3e9167a406976cd50c8MD5110183/1892432019-03-20 02:30:51.510053oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/189243Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2019-03-20T05:30:51Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Comparison of CALMET and WRF/CALMET coupling for dispersion of NO2 and SO2 using CALPUFF modelling system
title Comparison of CALMET and WRF/CALMET coupling for dispersion of NO2 and SO2 using CALPUFF modelling system
spellingShingle Comparison of CALMET and WRF/CALMET coupling for dispersion of NO2 and SO2 using CALPUFF modelling system
Schramm, Juliana
Dispersão de poluentes
Modelos matemáticos
WRF
CALPUFF
Dispersion
Model
Brazil
title_short Comparison of CALMET and WRF/CALMET coupling for dispersion of NO2 and SO2 using CALPUFF modelling system
title_full Comparison of CALMET and WRF/CALMET coupling for dispersion of NO2 and SO2 using CALPUFF modelling system
title_fullStr Comparison of CALMET and WRF/CALMET coupling for dispersion of NO2 and SO2 using CALPUFF modelling system
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of CALMET and WRF/CALMET coupling for dispersion of NO2 and SO2 using CALPUFF modelling system
title_sort Comparison of CALMET and WRF/CALMET coupling for dispersion of NO2 and SO2 using CALPUFF modelling system
author Schramm, Juliana
author_facet Schramm, Juliana
Degrazia, Franco Caldas
Vilhena, Marco Tullio Menna Barreto de
Bodmann, Bardo Ernst Josef
author_role author
author2 Degrazia, Franco Caldas
Vilhena, Marco Tullio Menna Barreto de
Bodmann, Bardo Ernst Josef
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schramm, Juliana
Degrazia, Franco Caldas
Vilhena, Marco Tullio Menna Barreto de
Bodmann, Bardo Ernst Josef
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dispersão de poluentes
Modelos matemáticos
topic Dispersão de poluentes
Modelos matemáticos
WRF
CALPUFF
Dispersion
Model
Brazil
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv WRF
CALPUFF
Dispersion
Model
Brazil
description This study aims to compare the wind and concentration field generated by a coupling of WRF/CALMET model and CALMET/CALPUFF with no introduction of any gridded wind field. The domain was located at the city of Linhares, southeast region of Brazil, with a 15×15 grid cells and 1 km resolution. The chosen modelling period was April 1st, 2011, with the length of 90 h. The pollutants simulated by CALPUFF were NO2 and SO2. The final results of dispersion and concentration peak were compared against environmental legislation of 1 h average for NO2 and 24 h average for SO2. The first simulation, using WRF/CALMET model, shows plausible results. The second mode, CALMET/CALPUFF, generated a wind field with questionable results, which probably compromised the dispersion simulation. Both model results are within environmental legislation.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-03-02T02:31:41Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/189243
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2166-465X
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001009954
identifier_str_mv 2166-465X
001009954
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/189243
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv American Journal of Environmental Engineering [recurso eletrônico]. Rosemead. Vol. 6, no. 4A (016), p. 50-55
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/189243/2/001009954.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/189243/1/001009954.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f80638c6d94f2548f604f841deb12282
a43e78d4c5b0e3e9167a406976cd50c8
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224963432120320

Registros relacionados