Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Paiz, Janini Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Castro, Stela Maris de Jezus, Giugliani, Elsa Regina Justo, Ahne, Sarah Maria dos Santos, Dall’Aqua, Camila Bonalume, Souto, Alice Steglich, Giugliani, Camila
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/250445
Resumo: The objective of this study was to structure a proposal for an instrument to measure the mistreatment level of women during childbirth, through item response theory, based on the birth experience of postpartum women. A cross-sectional study was conducted, with the inclusion of 287 women who did not suffer complications during childbirth, randomly selected from two maternity hospitals in the capital of Rio Grande do Sul—Brazil, in 2016. Approximately 30 days after delivery, the women answered questions in a face-to-face interview about their birth experience (practices and interventions applied) and were inquired about their perception of having suffered disrespect, mistreatment or humiliation by health professionals. The set of practices was included in the item response theory model to design the instrument. Of the 36 items included in the model, 21 dealt with practices applied exclusively to women who went into labor, therefore two instruments were developed. The instrument including all women, containing 09 items, identified 23.7% prevalence of mistreatment to women during childbirth, while the instrument for women going into labor included 11 items and identified 22% prevalence. The items with the highest discrimination were: not having had a companion during labor (2.05; and 1.26), not feeling welcome (1.81; and 1.58), and not feeling safe (1.59; and 1.70), for all women and for those who went into labor, respectively. For those who went into labor, the items, did not have a companion during labor (1.22; PE 0.88) and did not feel comfortable asking questions and participating in decisions (1.20; PE 0.43) also showed greater discrimination. In contrast, when directly questioned, only 12.5% of women said they had experienced disrespect or mistreatment, suggesting that harmful practices are often not recognized as violent. Standardizing the measurement of mistreatment of women during childbirth can create more accurate estimates of its prevalence and contribute to the proposal of strategies to eliminate obstetric violence.
id UFRGS-2_82fb57b36e63ce2d83736b6267a6ae6a
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/250445
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Paiz, Janini CristinaCastro, Stela Maris de JezusGiugliani, Elsa Regina JustoAhne, Sarah Maria dos SantosDall’Aqua, Camila BonalumeSouto, Alice SteglichGiugliani, Camila2022-10-27T04:50:57Z20221932-6203http://hdl.handle.net/10183/250445001150541The objective of this study was to structure a proposal for an instrument to measure the mistreatment level of women during childbirth, through item response theory, based on the birth experience of postpartum women. A cross-sectional study was conducted, with the inclusion of 287 women who did not suffer complications during childbirth, randomly selected from two maternity hospitals in the capital of Rio Grande do Sul—Brazil, in 2016. Approximately 30 days after delivery, the women answered questions in a face-to-face interview about their birth experience (practices and interventions applied) and were inquired about their perception of having suffered disrespect, mistreatment or humiliation by health professionals. The set of practices was included in the item response theory model to design the instrument. Of the 36 items included in the model, 21 dealt with practices applied exclusively to women who went into labor, therefore two instruments were developed. The instrument including all women, containing 09 items, identified 23.7% prevalence of mistreatment to women during childbirth, while the instrument for women going into labor included 11 items and identified 22% prevalence. The items with the highest discrimination were: not having had a companion during labor (2.05; and 1.26), not feeling welcome (1.81; and 1.58), and not feeling safe (1.59; and 1.70), for all women and for those who went into labor, respectively. For those who went into labor, the items, did not have a companion during labor (1.22; PE 0.88) and did not feel comfortable asking questions and participating in decisions (1.20; PE 0.43) also showed greater discrimination. In contrast, when directly questioned, only 12.5% of women said they had experienced disrespect or mistreatment, suggesting that harmful practices are often not recognized as violent. Standardizing the measurement of mistreatment of women during childbirth can create more accurate estimates of its prevalence and contribute to the proposal of strategies to eliminate obstetric violence.application/pdfengPloS one. San Francisco. Vol. 17, no. 7 (July 2022), e0271278, 20 p.Violência obstétricaComplicações do trabalho de partoDevelopment of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theoryEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001150541.pdf.txt001150541.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain66152http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/250445/2/001150541.pdf.txtdfe21e378be24aef089c1352049a8ed9MD52ORIGINAL001150541.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1076527http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/250445/1/001150541.pdf68ce292f7c9b4941d3c461997cba53c0MD5110183/2504452023-09-24 03:38:17.941641oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/250445Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-09-24T06:38:17Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory
title Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory
spellingShingle Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory
Paiz, Janini Cristina
Violência obstétrica
Complicações do trabalho de parto
title_short Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory
title_full Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory
title_fullStr Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory
title_full_unstemmed Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory
title_sort Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory
author Paiz, Janini Cristina
author_facet Paiz, Janini Cristina
Castro, Stela Maris de Jezus
Giugliani, Elsa Regina Justo
Ahne, Sarah Maria dos Santos
Dall’Aqua, Camila Bonalume
Souto, Alice Steglich
Giugliani, Camila
author_role author
author2 Castro, Stela Maris de Jezus
Giugliani, Elsa Regina Justo
Ahne, Sarah Maria dos Santos
Dall’Aqua, Camila Bonalume
Souto, Alice Steglich
Giugliani, Camila
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Paiz, Janini Cristina
Castro, Stela Maris de Jezus
Giugliani, Elsa Regina Justo
Ahne, Sarah Maria dos Santos
Dall’Aqua, Camila Bonalume
Souto, Alice Steglich
Giugliani, Camila
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Violência obstétrica
Complicações do trabalho de parto
topic Violência obstétrica
Complicações do trabalho de parto
description The objective of this study was to structure a proposal for an instrument to measure the mistreatment level of women during childbirth, through item response theory, based on the birth experience of postpartum women. A cross-sectional study was conducted, with the inclusion of 287 women who did not suffer complications during childbirth, randomly selected from two maternity hospitals in the capital of Rio Grande do Sul—Brazil, in 2016. Approximately 30 days after delivery, the women answered questions in a face-to-face interview about their birth experience (practices and interventions applied) and were inquired about their perception of having suffered disrespect, mistreatment or humiliation by health professionals. The set of practices was included in the item response theory model to design the instrument. Of the 36 items included in the model, 21 dealt with practices applied exclusively to women who went into labor, therefore two instruments were developed. The instrument including all women, containing 09 items, identified 23.7% prevalence of mistreatment to women during childbirth, while the instrument for women going into labor included 11 items and identified 22% prevalence. The items with the highest discrimination were: not having had a companion during labor (2.05; and 1.26), not feeling welcome (1.81; and 1.58), and not feeling safe (1.59; and 1.70), for all women and for those who went into labor, respectively. For those who went into labor, the items, did not have a companion during labor (1.22; PE 0.88) and did not feel comfortable asking questions and participating in decisions (1.20; PE 0.43) also showed greater discrimination. In contrast, when directly questioned, only 12.5% of women said they had experienced disrespect or mistreatment, suggesting that harmful practices are often not recognized as violent. Standardizing the measurement of mistreatment of women during childbirth can create more accurate estimates of its prevalence and contribute to the proposal of strategies to eliminate obstetric violence.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-10-27T04:50:57Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/250445
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1932-6203
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001150541
identifier_str_mv 1932-6203
001150541
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/250445
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv PloS one. San Francisco. Vol. 17, no. 7 (July 2022), e0271278, 20 p.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/250445/2/001150541.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/250445/1/001150541.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv dfe21e378be24aef089c1352049a8ed9
68ce292f7c9b4941d3c461997cba53c0
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1815447810191917056