Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/250445 |
Resumo: | The objective of this study was to structure a proposal for an instrument to measure the mistreatment level of women during childbirth, through item response theory, based on the birth experience of postpartum women. A cross-sectional study was conducted, with the inclusion of 287 women who did not suffer complications during childbirth, randomly selected from two maternity hospitals in the capital of Rio Grande do Sul—Brazil, in 2016. Approximately 30 days after delivery, the women answered questions in a face-to-face interview about their birth experience (practices and interventions applied) and were inquired about their perception of having suffered disrespect, mistreatment or humiliation by health professionals. The set of practices was included in the item response theory model to design the instrument. Of the 36 items included in the model, 21 dealt with practices applied exclusively to women who went into labor, therefore two instruments were developed. The instrument including all women, containing 09 items, identified 23.7% prevalence of mistreatment to women during childbirth, while the instrument for women going into labor included 11 items and identified 22% prevalence. The items with the highest discrimination were: not having had a companion during labor (2.05; and 1.26), not feeling welcome (1.81; and 1.58), and not feeling safe (1.59; and 1.70), for all women and for those who went into labor, respectively. For those who went into labor, the items, did not have a companion during labor (1.22; PE 0.88) and did not feel comfortable asking questions and participating in decisions (1.20; PE 0.43) also showed greater discrimination. In contrast, when directly questioned, only 12.5% of women said they had experienced disrespect or mistreatment, suggesting that harmful practices are often not recognized as violent. Standardizing the measurement of mistreatment of women during childbirth can create more accurate estimates of its prevalence and contribute to the proposal of strategies to eliminate obstetric violence. |
id |
UFRGS-2_82fb57b36e63ce2d83736b6267a6ae6a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/250445 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Paiz, Janini CristinaCastro, Stela Maris de JezusGiugliani, Elsa Regina JustoAhne, Sarah Maria dos SantosDall’Aqua, Camila BonalumeSouto, Alice SteglichGiugliani, Camila2022-10-27T04:50:57Z20221932-6203http://hdl.handle.net/10183/250445001150541The objective of this study was to structure a proposal for an instrument to measure the mistreatment level of women during childbirth, through item response theory, based on the birth experience of postpartum women. A cross-sectional study was conducted, with the inclusion of 287 women who did not suffer complications during childbirth, randomly selected from two maternity hospitals in the capital of Rio Grande do Sul—Brazil, in 2016. Approximately 30 days after delivery, the women answered questions in a face-to-face interview about their birth experience (practices and interventions applied) and were inquired about their perception of having suffered disrespect, mistreatment or humiliation by health professionals. The set of practices was included in the item response theory model to design the instrument. Of the 36 items included in the model, 21 dealt with practices applied exclusively to women who went into labor, therefore two instruments were developed. The instrument including all women, containing 09 items, identified 23.7% prevalence of mistreatment to women during childbirth, while the instrument for women going into labor included 11 items and identified 22% prevalence. The items with the highest discrimination were: not having had a companion during labor (2.05; and 1.26), not feeling welcome (1.81; and 1.58), and not feeling safe (1.59; and 1.70), for all women and for those who went into labor, respectively. For those who went into labor, the items, did not have a companion during labor (1.22; PE 0.88) and did not feel comfortable asking questions and participating in decisions (1.20; PE 0.43) also showed greater discrimination. In contrast, when directly questioned, only 12.5% of women said they had experienced disrespect or mistreatment, suggesting that harmful practices are often not recognized as violent. Standardizing the measurement of mistreatment of women during childbirth can create more accurate estimates of its prevalence and contribute to the proposal of strategies to eliminate obstetric violence.application/pdfengPloS one. San Francisco. Vol. 17, no. 7 (July 2022), e0271278, 20 p.Violência obstétricaComplicações do trabalho de partoDevelopment of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theoryEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001150541.pdf.txt001150541.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain66152http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/250445/2/001150541.pdf.txtdfe21e378be24aef089c1352049a8ed9MD52ORIGINAL001150541.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1076527http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/250445/1/001150541.pdf68ce292f7c9b4941d3c461997cba53c0MD5110183/2504452023-09-24 03:38:17.941641oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/250445Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-09-24T06:38:17Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory |
title |
Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory |
spellingShingle |
Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory Paiz, Janini Cristina Violência obstétrica Complicações do trabalho de parto |
title_short |
Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory |
title_full |
Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory |
title_fullStr |
Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory |
title_sort |
Development of an instrument to measure mistreatment of women during childbirth through item response theory |
author |
Paiz, Janini Cristina |
author_facet |
Paiz, Janini Cristina Castro, Stela Maris de Jezus Giugliani, Elsa Regina Justo Ahne, Sarah Maria dos Santos Dall’Aqua, Camila Bonalume Souto, Alice Steglich Giugliani, Camila |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Castro, Stela Maris de Jezus Giugliani, Elsa Regina Justo Ahne, Sarah Maria dos Santos Dall’Aqua, Camila Bonalume Souto, Alice Steglich Giugliani, Camila |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Paiz, Janini Cristina Castro, Stela Maris de Jezus Giugliani, Elsa Regina Justo Ahne, Sarah Maria dos Santos Dall’Aqua, Camila Bonalume Souto, Alice Steglich Giugliani, Camila |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Violência obstétrica Complicações do trabalho de parto |
topic |
Violência obstétrica Complicações do trabalho de parto |
description |
The objective of this study was to structure a proposal for an instrument to measure the mistreatment level of women during childbirth, through item response theory, based on the birth experience of postpartum women. A cross-sectional study was conducted, with the inclusion of 287 women who did not suffer complications during childbirth, randomly selected from two maternity hospitals in the capital of Rio Grande do Sul—Brazil, in 2016. Approximately 30 days after delivery, the women answered questions in a face-to-face interview about their birth experience (practices and interventions applied) and were inquired about their perception of having suffered disrespect, mistreatment or humiliation by health professionals. The set of practices was included in the item response theory model to design the instrument. Of the 36 items included in the model, 21 dealt with practices applied exclusively to women who went into labor, therefore two instruments were developed. The instrument including all women, containing 09 items, identified 23.7% prevalence of mistreatment to women during childbirth, while the instrument for women going into labor included 11 items and identified 22% prevalence. The items with the highest discrimination were: not having had a companion during labor (2.05; and 1.26), not feeling welcome (1.81; and 1.58), and not feeling safe (1.59; and 1.70), for all women and for those who went into labor, respectively. For those who went into labor, the items, did not have a companion during labor (1.22; PE 0.88) and did not feel comfortable asking questions and participating in decisions (1.20; PE 0.43) also showed greater discrimination. In contrast, when directly questioned, only 12.5% of women said they had experienced disrespect or mistreatment, suggesting that harmful practices are often not recognized as violent. Standardizing the measurement of mistreatment of women during childbirth can create more accurate estimates of its prevalence and contribute to the proposal of strategies to eliminate obstetric violence. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2022-10-27T04:50:57Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2022 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/250445 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1932-6203 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001150541 |
identifier_str_mv |
1932-6203 001150541 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/250445 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
PloS one. San Francisco. Vol. 17, no. 7 (July 2022), e0271278, 20 p. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/250445/2/001150541.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/250445/1/001150541.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
dfe21e378be24aef089c1352049a8ed9 68ce292f7c9b4941d3c461997cba53c0 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447810191917056 |