Modulation of the intestinal microbiota of broilers supplemented with monensin or functional oils in response to challenge by Eimeria spp.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Vieira, Alexandre Maciel
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Soratto, Tatiany Aparecida Teixeira, Cardinal, Kátia Maria, Wagner, Glauber, Hauptli, Lucélia, Lima, André Luis Ferreira, Dahlke, Fabiano, Peres Netto, Diego, Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira, Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/256021
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of supplementation with 100ppm sodium monensin or 0.15% of a blend of functional oils (cashew nut oil + castor oil) on the intestinal microbiota of broilers challenged with three different Eimeria spp. The challenge was accomplished by inoculating broiler chicks with sporulated oocysts of Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima via oral gavage. A total of 864, day-old male broiler chicks (Cobb) were randomly assigned to six treatments (eight pens/treatment; 18 broilers/ pen) in a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement, composed of three additives (control, monensin or blend), with or without Eimeria challenge. Intestinal contents was collected at 28 days of age for microbiota analysis by sequencing 16s rRNA in V3 and V4 regions using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Taxonomy was assigned through the SILVA database version 132, using the QIIME 2 software version 2019.1. No treatment effects (p > 0.05) were observed in the microbial richness at the family level estimated by Chao1 and the biodiversity assessed by Simpson’s index, except for Shannon’s index (p < 0.05). The intestinal microbiota was domi- nated by members of the order Clostridiales and Lactobacillales, followed by the families Ruminococcaceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Lactobacillaceae, regardless of treatment. When the controls were compared, in the challenged control group there was an increase in Erysi- pelotrichaceae, Lactobacillaceae, Bacteroidaceae, Streptococcaceae, and Peptostrepto- coccaceae, and a decrease in Ruminococcaceae. Similar results were found for a challenged group that received monensin, while the blend partially mitigated this variation. Therefore, the blend alleviated the impact of coccidiosis challenge on the microbiome of broilers compared to monensin.
id UFRGS-2_882fc7808277585a67ddaa4bbf6d94cb
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/256021
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Vieira, Alexandre MacielSoratto, Tatiany Aparecida TeixeiraCardinal, Kátia MariaWagner, GlauberHauptli, LucéliaLima, André Luis FerreiraDahlke, FabianoPeres Netto, DiegoMoraes, Priscila de OliveiraRibeiro, Andrea Machado Leal2023-03-18T03:32:47Z20201932-6203http://hdl.handle.net/10183/256021001164100The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of supplementation with 100ppm sodium monensin or 0.15% of a blend of functional oils (cashew nut oil + castor oil) on the intestinal microbiota of broilers challenged with three different Eimeria spp. The challenge was accomplished by inoculating broiler chicks with sporulated oocysts of Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima via oral gavage. A total of 864, day-old male broiler chicks (Cobb) were randomly assigned to six treatments (eight pens/treatment; 18 broilers/ pen) in a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement, composed of three additives (control, monensin or blend), with or without Eimeria challenge. Intestinal contents was collected at 28 days of age for microbiota analysis by sequencing 16s rRNA in V3 and V4 regions using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Taxonomy was assigned through the SILVA database version 132, using the QIIME 2 software version 2019.1. No treatment effects (p > 0.05) were observed in the microbial richness at the family level estimated by Chao1 and the biodiversity assessed by Simpson’s index, except for Shannon’s index (p < 0.05). The intestinal microbiota was domi- nated by members of the order Clostridiales and Lactobacillales, followed by the families Ruminococcaceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Lactobacillaceae, regardless of treatment. When the controls were compared, in the challenged control group there was an increase in Erysi- pelotrichaceae, Lactobacillaceae, Bacteroidaceae, Streptococcaceae, and Peptostrepto- coccaceae, and a decrease in Ruminococcaceae. Similar results were found for a challenged group that received monensin, while the blend partially mitigated this variation. Therefore, the blend alleviated the impact of coccidiosis challenge on the microbiome of broilers compared to monensin.application/pdfengPLoS ONE. San Francisco. Vol. 15 no. 8 (Aug. 2020), e0237118, 15 p.Nutricao animalSuplemento alimentarMonensinaFrango de corteFlora microbianaModulation of the intestinal microbiota of broilers supplemented with monensin or functional oils in response to challenge by Eimeria spp.Estrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001164100.pdf.txt001164100.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain48813http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/256021/2/001164100.pdf.txt68d9c8df5b60348cc1128da355f8de74MD52ORIGINAL001164100.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf2517592http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/256021/1/001164100.pdfd148d7908b619f992379e386181fb207MD5110183/2560212023-03-19 03:35:20.474246oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/256021Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-03-19T06:35:20Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Modulation of the intestinal microbiota of broilers supplemented with monensin or functional oils in response to challenge by Eimeria spp.
title Modulation of the intestinal microbiota of broilers supplemented with monensin or functional oils in response to challenge by Eimeria spp.
spellingShingle Modulation of the intestinal microbiota of broilers supplemented with monensin or functional oils in response to challenge by Eimeria spp.
Vieira, Alexandre Maciel
Nutricao animal
Suplemento alimentar
Monensina
Frango de corte
Flora microbiana
title_short Modulation of the intestinal microbiota of broilers supplemented with monensin or functional oils in response to challenge by Eimeria spp.
title_full Modulation of the intestinal microbiota of broilers supplemented with monensin or functional oils in response to challenge by Eimeria spp.
title_fullStr Modulation of the intestinal microbiota of broilers supplemented with monensin or functional oils in response to challenge by Eimeria spp.
title_full_unstemmed Modulation of the intestinal microbiota of broilers supplemented with monensin or functional oils in response to challenge by Eimeria spp.
title_sort Modulation of the intestinal microbiota of broilers supplemented with monensin or functional oils in response to challenge by Eimeria spp.
author Vieira, Alexandre Maciel
author_facet Vieira, Alexandre Maciel
Soratto, Tatiany Aparecida Teixeira
Cardinal, Kátia Maria
Wagner, Glauber
Hauptli, Lucélia
Lima, André Luis Ferreira
Dahlke, Fabiano
Peres Netto, Diego
Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira
Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal
author_role author
author2 Soratto, Tatiany Aparecida Teixeira
Cardinal, Kátia Maria
Wagner, Glauber
Hauptli, Lucélia
Lima, André Luis Ferreira
Dahlke, Fabiano
Peres Netto, Diego
Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira
Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vieira, Alexandre Maciel
Soratto, Tatiany Aparecida Teixeira
Cardinal, Kátia Maria
Wagner, Glauber
Hauptli, Lucélia
Lima, André Luis Ferreira
Dahlke, Fabiano
Peres Netto, Diego
Moraes, Priscila de Oliveira
Ribeiro, Andrea Machado Leal
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Nutricao animal
Suplemento alimentar
Monensina
Frango de corte
Flora microbiana
topic Nutricao animal
Suplemento alimentar
Monensina
Frango de corte
Flora microbiana
description The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of supplementation with 100ppm sodium monensin or 0.15% of a blend of functional oils (cashew nut oil + castor oil) on the intestinal microbiota of broilers challenged with three different Eimeria spp. The challenge was accomplished by inoculating broiler chicks with sporulated oocysts of Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima via oral gavage. A total of 864, day-old male broiler chicks (Cobb) were randomly assigned to six treatments (eight pens/treatment; 18 broilers/ pen) in a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement, composed of three additives (control, monensin or blend), with or without Eimeria challenge. Intestinal contents was collected at 28 days of age for microbiota analysis by sequencing 16s rRNA in V3 and V4 regions using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Taxonomy was assigned through the SILVA database version 132, using the QIIME 2 software version 2019.1. No treatment effects (p > 0.05) were observed in the microbial richness at the family level estimated by Chao1 and the biodiversity assessed by Simpson’s index, except for Shannon’s index (p < 0.05). The intestinal microbiota was domi- nated by members of the order Clostridiales and Lactobacillales, followed by the families Ruminococcaceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Lactobacillaceae, regardless of treatment. When the controls were compared, in the challenged control group there was an increase in Erysi- pelotrichaceae, Lactobacillaceae, Bacteroidaceae, Streptococcaceae, and Peptostrepto- coccaceae, and a decrease in Ruminococcaceae. Similar results were found for a challenged group that received monensin, while the blend partially mitigated this variation. Therefore, the blend alleviated the impact of coccidiosis challenge on the microbiome of broilers compared to monensin.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-03-18T03:32:47Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/256021
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1932-6203
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001164100
identifier_str_mv 1932-6203
001164100
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/256021
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv PLoS ONE. San Francisco. Vol. 15 no. 8 (Aug. 2020), e0237118, 15 p.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/256021/2/001164100.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/256021/1/001164100.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 68d9c8df5b60348cc1128da355f8de74
d148d7908b619f992379e386181fb207
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801225083671281664