Natural and improved pastures on growth and reproductive performance of Hereford heifers

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rosa, Antônio Augusto Galarza
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Vaz, Ricardo Zambarda, Lobato, Jose Fernando Piva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/98409
Resumo: This study evaluated yearling growth and reproductive performance of Hereford heifers at 24-26 months of age grazing on natural pastures at two stocking rates during winter and spring, associated or not to improved natural pastures. Heifers were classified according to three weight groups (Light, Medium and Heavy) and randomly distributed into four feeding management practices: 0.6 AU (1 animal unit = 450-kg body weight) – heifers on natural pastures at a stocking rate of 0.6 AU/ha; 0.8 AU – heifers on natural pastures at a stocking rate of 0.8 AU/ha; 0.6 AUI – heifers on natural pastures at a stocking rate of 0.6 AU/ha and on improved natural pastures between Sept 1st and Nov 1st; 0.8 AUI – heifers on natural pasture at a stocking rate of 0.8 AU/ha and on improved natural pastures between Sept 1st and Nov 1st. The stocking rate of 0.8 AU resulted in significant weight loss during winter months (-0.138 and -0.356 kg for 0.6 and 0.8 AU, respectively). Heifers grazing during the spring on improved natural pastures presented higher weight gain before the breeding season and higher body weight and body condition score in the beginning and end of the breeding season in relation to those grazing only on natural pastures. Heifers kept at 0.6 AU/ha obtained 69.7% pregnancy rate, which was significantly higher than the 54.2% of those managed at 0.8 UA/ha. Heifers grazing on improved natural pastures during the spring achieved 83.8% pregnancy rate, whereas those maintained on natural pastures achieved only 40.2%. Light and medium heifers lost less weight during the winter as compared with the heavy ones, but weight differences between groups remained until the end of the breeding season. Heavy heifers have higher pregnancy rates. Heifers submitted to lower stocking rate and those grazing on improved natural pastures conceive earlier.
id UFRGS-2_92b084e01b8f35e030fdcde9f1ad19ca
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/98409
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Rosa, Antônio Augusto GalarzaVaz, Ricardo ZambardaLobato, Jose Fernando Piva2014-07-23T02:05:22Z20121516-3598http://hdl.handle.net/10183/98409000835196This study evaluated yearling growth and reproductive performance of Hereford heifers at 24-26 months of age grazing on natural pastures at two stocking rates during winter and spring, associated or not to improved natural pastures. Heifers were classified according to three weight groups (Light, Medium and Heavy) and randomly distributed into four feeding management practices: 0.6 AU (1 animal unit = 450-kg body weight) – heifers on natural pastures at a stocking rate of 0.6 AU/ha; 0.8 AU – heifers on natural pastures at a stocking rate of 0.8 AU/ha; 0.6 AUI – heifers on natural pastures at a stocking rate of 0.6 AU/ha and on improved natural pastures between Sept 1st and Nov 1st; 0.8 AUI – heifers on natural pasture at a stocking rate of 0.8 AU/ha and on improved natural pastures between Sept 1st and Nov 1st. The stocking rate of 0.8 AU resulted in significant weight loss during winter months (-0.138 and -0.356 kg for 0.6 and 0.8 AU, respectively). Heifers grazing during the spring on improved natural pastures presented higher weight gain before the breeding season and higher body weight and body condition score in the beginning and end of the breeding season in relation to those grazing only on natural pastures. Heifers kept at 0.6 AU/ha obtained 69.7% pregnancy rate, which was significantly higher than the 54.2% of those managed at 0.8 UA/ha. Heifers grazing on improved natural pastures during the spring achieved 83.8% pregnancy rate, whereas those maintained on natural pastures achieved only 40.2%. Light and medium heifers lost less weight during the winter as compared with the heavy ones, but weight differences between groups remained until the end of the breeding season. Heavy heifers have higher pregnancy rates. Heifers submitted to lower stocking rate and those grazing on improved natural pastures conceive earlier.application/pdfengRevista brasileira de zootecnia. Viçosa, MG. Vol. 41, n. 1, (jan. 2012), p. 203-211Reprodução animalNutricao animalPastagemBody conditionLive weightPregnancyStocking rateWeight gainNatural and improved pastures on growth and reproductive performance of Hereford heifersinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000835196.pdf000835196.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf130119http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/98409/1/000835196.pdfcfbebb6eb915b0158d5bd10992bb468cMD51TEXT000835196.pdf.txt000835196.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain46762http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/98409/2/000835196.pdf.txt907cc8bea3195a58984acc13379a76ccMD52THUMBNAIL000835196.pdf.jpg000835196.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2234http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/98409/3/000835196.pdf.jpg219a363032d46c490091b360756bac1fMD5310183/984092021-07-09 04:32:50.184732oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/98409Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.bropendoar:2021-07-09T07:32:50Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Natural and improved pastures on growth and reproductive performance of Hereford heifers
title Natural and improved pastures on growth and reproductive performance of Hereford heifers
spellingShingle Natural and improved pastures on growth and reproductive performance of Hereford heifers
Rosa, Antônio Augusto Galarza
Reprodução animal
Nutricao animal
Pastagem
Body condition
Live weight
Pregnancy
Stocking rate
Weight gain
title_short Natural and improved pastures on growth and reproductive performance of Hereford heifers
title_full Natural and improved pastures on growth and reproductive performance of Hereford heifers
title_fullStr Natural and improved pastures on growth and reproductive performance of Hereford heifers
title_full_unstemmed Natural and improved pastures on growth and reproductive performance of Hereford heifers
title_sort Natural and improved pastures on growth and reproductive performance of Hereford heifers
author Rosa, Antônio Augusto Galarza
author_facet Rosa, Antônio Augusto Galarza
Vaz, Ricardo Zambarda
Lobato, Jose Fernando Piva
author_role author
author2 Vaz, Ricardo Zambarda
Lobato, Jose Fernando Piva
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rosa, Antônio Augusto Galarza
Vaz, Ricardo Zambarda
Lobato, Jose Fernando Piva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reprodução animal
Nutricao animal
Pastagem
topic Reprodução animal
Nutricao animal
Pastagem
Body condition
Live weight
Pregnancy
Stocking rate
Weight gain
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Body condition
Live weight
Pregnancy
Stocking rate
Weight gain
description This study evaluated yearling growth and reproductive performance of Hereford heifers at 24-26 months of age grazing on natural pastures at two stocking rates during winter and spring, associated or not to improved natural pastures. Heifers were classified according to three weight groups (Light, Medium and Heavy) and randomly distributed into four feeding management practices: 0.6 AU (1 animal unit = 450-kg body weight) – heifers on natural pastures at a stocking rate of 0.6 AU/ha; 0.8 AU – heifers on natural pastures at a stocking rate of 0.8 AU/ha; 0.6 AUI – heifers on natural pastures at a stocking rate of 0.6 AU/ha and on improved natural pastures between Sept 1st and Nov 1st; 0.8 AUI – heifers on natural pasture at a stocking rate of 0.8 AU/ha and on improved natural pastures between Sept 1st and Nov 1st. The stocking rate of 0.8 AU resulted in significant weight loss during winter months (-0.138 and -0.356 kg for 0.6 and 0.8 AU, respectively). Heifers grazing during the spring on improved natural pastures presented higher weight gain before the breeding season and higher body weight and body condition score in the beginning and end of the breeding season in relation to those grazing only on natural pastures. Heifers kept at 0.6 AU/ha obtained 69.7% pregnancy rate, which was significantly higher than the 54.2% of those managed at 0.8 UA/ha. Heifers grazing on improved natural pastures during the spring achieved 83.8% pregnancy rate, whereas those maintained on natural pastures achieved only 40.2%. Light and medium heifers lost less weight during the winter as compared with the heavy ones, but weight differences between groups remained until the end of the breeding season. Heavy heifers have higher pregnancy rates. Heifers submitted to lower stocking rate and those grazing on improved natural pastures conceive earlier.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2014-07-23T02:05:22Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/98409
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1516-3598
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000835196
identifier_str_mv 1516-3598
000835196
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/98409
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de zootecnia. Viçosa, MG. Vol. 41, n. 1, (jan. 2012), p. 203-211
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/98409/1/000835196.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/98409/2/000835196.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/98409/3/000835196.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv cfbebb6eb915b0158d5bd10992bb468c
907cc8bea3195a58984acc13379a76cc
219a363032d46c490091b360756bac1f
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lume@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1817724925571497984