Performance and carcass traits of Santa Inês lambs finished with different sources of forage

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Menezes, Adriana Morato
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Louvandini, Helder, Esteves, Geisa Isilda Ferreira, Dalcin, Luciana, Canozzi, Maria Eugênia Andrighetto, Barcellos, Julio Otavio Jardim, Pimentel, Concepta Margaret McManus
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/99278
Resumo: The objective of this study was to evaluate performance and biometrics of lambs fed different sources of forage. Twenty-four six-month-old Santa Inês female lambs were randomly allocated to four experimental diets and housed in individual stalls. They weighed on average 26.35±0.20 kg. The diets were coast cross hay (HAY), cassava hay (CAS), dehydrated by-product of pea crop (PEA) and saccharin (SAC). The diets were formulated with the same amount of protein and energy with fixedlevelsofforage(60%)andconcentrate(40%).Adaptationtothediettook7days,with45daysonexperiment.Weights and biometric measurements were obtained every fortnight and feed intake three times a week. Rights half-carcasses were weighed and sectioned into retail cuts, rib, loin, shoulder, belly, neck and leg, which were weighed individually. Weight gain in lambs was significantlydifferentbetweendiets,withthosefedsaccharingainingmore.Overall,treatmentsdidnotsignificantlyaffectbiometricmeasurements.Therewasasignificantdifferenceforfeedintakeandliveweightattheendoftheexperiment. Animals fed PEA and SAC showed the best results. Average positive correlations were found between biometric measurements and live weight. Treatment PEA had heavier hot (14.36 kg) and cold (14.01 kg) carcass weights than the other groups. Hot carcass kill-out was higher for animals fed PEA as well as ham weight, belly, neck and heart girth. The weight of the abdominal viscera (%) for lambs fed CAS was greater than those fed SAC and PEA. The weights of the thoracic viscera as well as the liver, for lambs fed PEA were higher. The by-product of pea yielded best results, followed by saccharin, and can replace traditional forage sources in the region, providing similar results in terms of cuts and body components. These could be an alternative for feeding sheep in the dry season. The substitution of forages using by-product of pea and saccharin led to improved productivity over the coast-cross hay available in the Federal District - Brazil.
id UFRGS-2_931194befef4a4a48388c79f77c20ecd
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/99278
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Menezes, Adriana MoratoLouvandini, HelderEsteves, Geisa Isilda FerreiraDalcin, LucianaCanozzi, Maria Eugênia AndrighettoBarcellos, Julio Otavio JardimPimentel, Concepta Margaret McManus2014-08-08T02:07:09Z20131516-3598http://hdl.handle.net/10183/99278000910228The objective of this study was to evaluate performance and biometrics of lambs fed different sources of forage. Twenty-four six-month-old Santa Inês female lambs were randomly allocated to four experimental diets and housed in individual stalls. They weighed on average 26.35±0.20 kg. The diets were coast cross hay (HAY), cassava hay (CAS), dehydrated by-product of pea crop (PEA) and saccharin (SAC). The diets were formulated with the same amount of protein and energy with fixedlevelsofforage(60%)andconcentrate(40%).Adaptationtothediettook7days,with45daysonexperiment.Weights and biometric measurements were obtained every fortnight and feed intake three times a week. Rights half-carcasses were weighed and sectioned into retail cuts, rib, loin, shoulder, belly, neck and leg, which were weighed individually. Weight gain in lambs was significantlydifferentbetweendiets,withthosefedsaccharingainingmore.Overall,treatmentsdidnotsignificantlyaffectbiometricmeasurements.Therewasasignificantdifferenceforfeedintakeandliveweightattheendoftheexperiment. Animals fed PEA and SAC showed the best results. Average positive correlations were found between biometric measurements and live weight. Treatment PEA had heavier hot (14.36 kg) and cold (14.01 kg) carcass weights than the other groups. Hot carcass kill-out was higher for animals fed PEA as well as ham weight, belly, neck and heart girth. The weight of the abdominal viscera (%) for lambs fed CAS was greater than those fed SAC and PEA. The weights of the thoracic viscera as well as the liver, for lambs fed PEA were higher. The by-product of pea yielded best results, followed by saccharin, and can replace traditional forage sources in the region, providing similar results in terms of cuts and body components. These could be an alternative for feeding sheep in the dry season. The substitution of forages using by-product of pea and saccharin led to improved productivity over the coast-cross hay available in the Federal District - Brazil.application/pdfengRevista brasileira de zootecnia= Brazilian journal of animal science [recurso eletrônico]. Viçosa, MG. Vol. 42, n.6 (jun. 2013), p. 428-437CordeiroOvinoNutricao animalForragemCarcaçaPerformance and carcass traits of Santa Inês lambs finished with different sources of forageinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000910228.pdf000910228.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf336901http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/99278/1/000910228.pdf17e51ef6a4616446463bcd060f24568dMD51TEXT000910228.pdf.txt000910228.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain54505http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/99278/2/000910228.pdf.txt05701af06c13d340f4f484cb7a9ce255MD52THUMBNAIL000910228.pdf.jpg000910228.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2279http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/99278/3/000910228.pdf.jpg7bba4ffcf71867c91d2c946e0f2eaa6dMD5310183/992782021-09-18 04:46:14.549601oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/99278Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-09-18T07:46:14Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Performance and carcass traits of Santa Inês lambs finished with different sources of forage
title Performance and carcass traits of Santa Inês lambs finished with different sources of forage
spellingShingle Performance and carcass traits of Santa Inês lambs finished with different sources of forage
Menezes, Adriana Morato
Cordeiro
Ovino
Nutricao animal
Forragem
Carcaça
title_short Performance and carcass traits of Santa Inês lambs finished with different sources of forage
title_full Performance and carcass traits of Santa Inês lambs finished with different sources of forage
title_fullStr Performance and carcass traits of Santa Inês lambs finished with different sources of forage
title_full_unstemmed Performance and carcass traits of Santa Inês lambs finished with different sources of forage
title_sort Performance and carcass traits of Santa Inês lambs finished with different sources of forage
author Menezes, Adriana Morato
author_facet Menezes, Adriana Morato
Louvandini, Helder
Esteves, Geisa Isilda Ferreira
Dalcin, Luciana
Canozzi, Maria Eugênia Andrighetto
Barcellos, Julio Otavio Jardim
Pimentel, Concepta Margaret McManus
author_role author
author2 Louvandini, Helder
Esteves, Geisa Isilda Ferreira
Dalcin, Luciana
Canozzi, Maria Eugênia Andrighetto
Barcellos, Julio Otavio Jardim
Pimentel, Concepta Margaret McManus
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Menezes, Adriana Morato
Louvandini, Helder
Esteves, Geisa Isilda Ferreira
Dalcin, Luciana
Canozzi, Maria Eugênia Andrighetto
Barcellos, Julio Otavio Jardim
Pimentel, Concepta Margaret McManus
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cordeiro
Ovino
Nutricao animal
Forragem
Carcaça
topic Cordeiro
Ovino
Nutricao animal
Forragem
Carcaça
description The objective of this study was to evaluate performance and biometrics of lambs fed different sources of forage. Twenty-four six-month-old Santa Inês female lambs were randomly allocated to four experimental diets and housed in individual stalls. They weighed on average 26.35±0.20 kg. The diets were coast cross hay (HAY), cassava hay (CAS), dehydrated by-product of pea crop (PEA) and saccharin (SAC). The diets were formulated with the same amount of protein and energy with fixedlevelsofforage(60%)andconcentrate(40%).Adaptationtothediettook7days,with45daysonexperiment.Weights and biometric measurements were obtained every fortnight and feed intake three times a week. Rights half-carcasses were weighed and sectioned into retail cuts, rib, loin, shoulder, belly, neck and leg, which were weighed individually. Weight gain in lambs was significantlydifferentbetweendiets,withthosefedsaccharingainingmore.Overall,treatmentsdidnotsignificantlyaffectbiometricmeasurements.Therewasasignificantdifferenceforfeedintakeandliveweightattheendoftheexperiment. Animals fed PEA and SAC showed the best results. Average positive correlations were found between biometric measurements and live weight. Treatment PEA had heavier hot (14.36 kg) and cold (14.01 kg) carcass weights than the other groups. Hot carcass kill-out was higher for animals fed PEA as well as ham weight, belly, neck and heart girth. The weight of the abdominal viscera (%) for lambs fed CAS was greater than those fed SAC and PEA. The weights of the thoracic viscera as well as the liver, for lambs fed PEA were higher. The by-product of pea yielded best results, followed by saccharin, and can replace traditional forage sources in the region, providing similar results in terms of cuts and body components. These could be an alternative for feeding sheep in the dry season. The substitution of forages using by-product of pea and saccharin led to improved productivity over the coast-cross hay available in the Federal District - Brazil.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2013
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2014-08-08T02:07:09Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/99278
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1516-3598
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000910228
identifier_str_mv 1516-3598
000910228
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/99278
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Revista brasileira de zootecnia= Brazilian journal of animal science [recurso eletrônico]. Viçosa, MG. Vol. 42, n.6 (jun. 2013), p. 428-437
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/99278/1/000910228.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/99278/2/000910228.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/99278/3/000910228.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 17e51ef6a4616446463bcd060f24568d
05701af06c13d340f4f484cb7a9ce255
7bba4ffcf71867c91d2c946e0f2eaa6d
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1798487251827556352