Waist-to-Height Ratio : A Sensitive Tool for Assessing the Need for Nutritional Risk Management in Elderly Populations from Brazil

• Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Vivian Carla Honorato dos Santos de
• Data de Publicação: 2023
• Outros Autores: Moreira, Leila Beltrami, Luft, Vivian Cristine, Fuchs, Sandra Cristina Pereira Costa
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/270818
• topic: Índice de massa corporal; Circunferência da cintura; Razão cintura-estatura; Obesidade; Obesidade abdominal; Sensibilidade e especificidade; BMI; Waist circumference; Waist-to-height ratio; Obesity; Abdominal obesity; Sensitivity and specificity

Introduction: Nutritional status assessment commonly relies on body mass index (BMI), which overlooks lean mass and adipose tissue distribution. However, waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) provide additional insights into fat accumulation. By combining these indices, it may be possible to identify older adults needing weight management interventions. Objectives: To assess the WC and WHtR as strategies for identifying individuals requiring weight management. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with 509 elderly individuals in Northeast Brazil. Weight, height, hip circumference, and waist circumference were measured, and combined with indices such as BMI WC, WHR, and WHtR to identify those who require weight management. The DeLong test compared areas under the curves using receiver operating characteristic curves and statistical significance. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated to verify usefulness for clinical application. A validation sample of 599 elderly individuals from the country’s Southern region was used to confirm the results. Results: Both WC and WHtR showed adequate diagnostic accuracy with no statistically significant difference in AUCs. WHtR ≥ 0.50 had 92% sensitivity in identifying men and women requiring nutritional management. WC presented lower sensitivity but 93% specificity, useful for excluding elderly individuals from the nutritional risk category. These results were consistent in the validation sample. Conclusion: WHtR is a valuable index for screening nutritional risk management in the elderly population, applicable to men and women. Conversely, WC performs better in excluding individuals who do not need nutritional risk management.