Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/29448 |
Resumo: | There is little material in the literature that compares biological width measurements in periapical and bite-wings radiographs with clinical measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of biological width taken by three different methods which are frequently used for planning periodontal surgery – periapical radiograph, bite-wing radiograph and transperiodontal probing – with the trans-surgical measurements. Thirty-four sites from twenty-one subjects were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients between measurements obtained trans-surgically (gold standard) and those obtained by transperiodontal probing, periapical radiography and bite-wing radiography were determined. Average measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test at a significance level of 0.05. Also, the frequency distribution of differences between test measurements and the gold standard was calculated. The results showed that transperiodontal probing (mean 2.05 mm) was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard (mean 1.97 mm), with no statistically significant difference observed. On the other hand, periapical and bite-wing radiographic mean values (1.56 mm and 1.72 mm, respectively) were smaller than the gold standard, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). It was concluded that transperiodontal probing was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard, followed by that obtained with the bite-wing radiograph. The clinical relevance of these results could be that planning for crown lengthening surgery should, preferably, include transperiodontal probing. |
id |
UFRGS-2_a0f01a73f95a38d31d39e8f40209dbdd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/29448 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Zanatta, Fabricio BatistinGiacomelli, Bruno RodriguesDotto, Patricia PasqualiFontanella, Vania Regina CamargoRösing, Cassiano Kuchenbecker2011-06-09T06:00:03Z20101806-8324http://hdl.handle.net/10183/29448000766470There is little material in the literature that compares biological width measurements in periapical and bite-wings radiographs with clinical measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of biological width taken by three different methods which are frequently used for planning periodontal surgery – periapical radiograph, bite-wing radiograph and transperiodontal probing – with the trans-surgical measurements. Thirty-four sites from twenty-one subjects were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients between measurements obtained trans-surgically (gold standard) and those obtained by transperiodontal probing, periapical radiography and bite-wing radiography were determined. Average measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test at a significance level of 0.05. Also, the frequency distribution of differences between test measurements and the gold standard was calculated. The results showed that transperiodontal probing (mean 2.05 mm) was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard (mean 1.97 mm), with no statistically significant difference observed. On the other hand, periapical and bite-wing radiographic mean values (1.56 mm and 1.72 mm, respectively) were smaller than the gold standard, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). It was concluded that transperiodontal probing was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard, followed by that obtained with the bite-wing radiograph. The clinical relevance of these results could be that planning for crown lengthening surgery should, preferably, include transperiodontal probing.application/pdfengBrazilian oral research. São Paulo. Vol. 24, no. 4 (Oct./Dec. 2010), p. 443-448PeriodontiaCirurgia dentariaRadiografia dentariaPeriodonticsPlanning techniquesCrown lengtheningSurgeryOralRadiologyComparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgeryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT000766470.pdf.txt000766470.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain21737http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/29448/2/000766470.pdf.txt778366c33f07195265cedc1cca8e62baMD52ORIGINAL000766470.pdf000766470.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf116457http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/29448/1/000766470.pdfca63b2cfcfec49058b5f1d50206be276MD51THUMBNAIL000766470.pdf.jpg000766470.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1712http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/29448/3/000766470.pdf.jpg8af7caa882f3847e6c1452bccb4c2b63MD5310183/294482021-07-09 04:33:54.976637oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/29448Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-07-09T07:33:54Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery |
title |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery Zanatta, Fabricio Batistin Periodontia Cirurgia dentaria Radiografia dentaria Periodontics Planning techniques Crown lengthening Surgery Oral Radiology |
title_short |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery |
title_full |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery |
title_sort |
Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery |
author |
Zanatta, Fabricio Batistin |
author_facet |
Zanatta, Fabricio Batistin Giacomelli, Bruno Rodrigues Dotto, Patricia Pasquali Fontanella, Vania Regina Camargo Rösing, Cassiano Kuchenbecker |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Giacomelli, Bruno Rodrigues Dotto, Patricia Pasquali Fontanella, Vania Regina Camargo Rösing, Cassiano Kuchenbecker |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Zanatta, Fabricio Batistin Giacomelli, Bruno Rodrigues Dotto, Patricia Pasquali Fontanella, Vania Regina Camargo Rösing, Cassiano Kuchenbecker |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Periodontia Cirurgia dentaria Radiografia dentaria |
topic |
Periodontia Cirurgia dentaria Radiografia dentaria Periodontics Planning techniques Crown lengthening Surgery Oral Radiology |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Periodontics Planning techniques Crown lengthening Surgery Oral Radiology |
description |
There is little material in the literature that compares biological width measurements in periapical and bite-wings radiographs with clinical measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of biological width taken by three different methods which are frequently used for planning periodontal surgery – periapical radiograph, bite-wing radiograph and transperiodontal probing – with the trans-surgical measurements. Thirty-four sites from twenty-one subjects were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients between measurements obtained trans-surgically (gold standard) and those obtained by transperiodontal probing, periapical radiography and bite-wing radiography were determined. Average measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test at a significance level of 0.05. Also, the frequency distribution of differences between test measurements and the gold standard was calculated. The results showed that transperiodontal probing (mean 2.05 mm) was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard (mean 1.97 mm), with no statistically significant difference observed. On the other hand, periapical and bite-wing radiographic mean values (1.56 mm and 1.72 mm, respectively) were smaller than the gold standard, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). It was concluded that transperiodontal probing was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard, followed by that obtained with the bite-wing radiograph. The clinical relevance of these results could be that planning for crown lengthening surgery should, preferably, include transperiodontal probing. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2010 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2011-06-09T06:00:03Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/29448 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1806-8324 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
000766470 |
identifier_str_mv |
1806-8324 000766470 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/29448 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian oral research. São Paulo. Vol. 24, no. 4 (Oct./Dec. 2010), p. 443-448 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/29448/2/000766470.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/29448/1/000766470.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/29448/3/000766470.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
778366c33f07195265cedc1cca8e62ba ca63b2cfcfec49058b5f1d50206be276 8af7caa882f3847e6c1452bccb4c2b63 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447424805634048 |