Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zanatta, Fabricio Batistin
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Giacomelli, Bruno Rodrigues, Dotto, Patricia Pasquali, Fontanella, Vania Regina Camargo, Rösing, Cassiano Kuchenbecker
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/29448
Resumo: There is little material in the literature that compares biological width measurements in periapical and bite-wings radiographs with clinical measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of biological width taken by three different methods which are frequently used for planning periodontal surgery – periapical radiograph, bite-wing radiograph and transperiodontal probing – with the trans-surgical measurements. Thirty-four sites from twenty-one subjects were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients between measurements obtained trans-surgically (gold standard) and those obtained by transperiodontal probing, periapical radiography and bite-wing radiography were determined. Average measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test at a significance level of 0.05. Also, the frequency distribution of differences between test measurements and the gold standard was calculated. The results showed that transperiodontal probing (mean 2.05 mm) was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard (mean 1.97 mm), with no statistically significant difference observed. On the other hand, periapical and bite-wing radiographic mean values (1.56 mm and 1.72 mm, respectively) were smaller than the gold standard, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). It was concluded that transperiodontal probing was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard, followed by that obtained with the bite-wing radiograph. The clinical relevance of these results could be that planning for crown lengthening surgery should, preferably, include transperiodontal probing.
id UFRGS-2_a0f01a73f95a38d31d39e8f40209dbdd
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/29448
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Zanatta, Fabricio BatistinGiacomelli, Bruno RodriguesDotto, Patricia PasqualiFontanella, Vania Regina CamargoRösing, Cassiano Kuchenbecker2011-06-09T06:00:03Z20101806-8324http://hdl.handle.net/10183/29448000766470There is little material in the literature that compares biological width measurements in periapical and bite-wings radiographs with clinical measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of biological width taken by three different methods which are frequently used for planning periodontal surgery – periapical radiograph, bite-wing radiograph and transperiodontal probing – with the trans-surgical measurements. Thirty-four sites from twenty-one subjects were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients between measurements obtained trans-surgically (gold standard) and those obtained by transperiodontal probing, periapical radiography and bite-wing radiography were determined. Average measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test at a significance level of 0.05. Also, the frequency distribution of differences between test measurements and the gold standard was calculated. The results showed that transperiodontal probing (mean 2.05 mm) was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard (mean 1.97 mm), with no statistically significant difference observed. On the other hand, periapical and bite-wing radiographic mean values (1.56 mm and 1.72 mm, respectively) were smaller than the gold standard, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). It was concluded that transperiodontal probing was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard, followed by that obtained with the bite-wing radiograph. The clinical relevance of these results could be that planning for crown lengthening surgery should, preferably, include transperiodontal probing.application/pdfengBrazilian oral research. São Paulo. Vol. 24, no. 4 (Oct./Dec. 2010), p. 443-448PeriodontiaCirurgia dentariaRadiografia dentariaPeriodonticsPlanning techniquesCrown lengtheningSurgeryOralRadiologyComparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgeryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT000766470.pdf.txt000766470.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain21737http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/29448/2/000766470.pdf.txt778366c33f07195265cedc1cca8e62baMD52ORIGINAL000766470.pdf000766470.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf116457http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/29448/1/000766470.pdfca63b2cfcfec49058b5f1d50206be276MD51THUMBNAIL000766470.pdf.jpg000766470.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1712http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/29448/3/000766470.pdf.jpg8af7caa882f3847e6c1452bccb4c2b63MD5310183/294482021-07-09 04:33:54.976637oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/29448Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-07-09T07:33:54Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
title Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
spellingShingle Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
Zanatta, Fabricio Batistin
Periodontia
Cirurgia dentaria
Radiografia dentaria
Periodontics
Planning techniques
Crown lengthening
Surgery
Oral
Radiology
title_short Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
title_full Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
title_fullStr Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
title_sort Comparison of different methods involved in the planning of clinical crown lengthening surgery
author Zanatta, Fabricio Batistin
author_facet Zanatta, Fabricio Batistin
Giacomelli, Bruno Rodrigues
Dotto, Patricia Pasquali
Fontanella, Vania Regina Camargo
Rösing, Cassiano Kuchenbecker
author_role author
author2 Giacomelli, Bruno Rodrigues
Dotto, Patricia Pasquali
Fontanella, Vania Regina Camargo
Rösing, Cassiano Kuchenbecker
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zanatta, Fabricio Batistin
Giacomelli, Bruno Rodrigues
Dotto, Patricia Pasquali
Fontanella, Vania Regina Camargo
Rösing, Cassiano Kuchenbecker
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Periodontia
Cirurgia dentaria
Radiografia dentaria
topic Periodontia
Cirurgia dentaria
Radiografia dentaria
Periodontics
Planning techniques
Crown lengthening
Surgery
Oral
Radiology
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Periodontics
Planning techniques
Crown lengthening
Surgery
Oral
Radiology
description There is little material in the literature that compares biological width measurements in periapical and bite-wings radiographs with clinical measurements. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of biological width taken by three different methods which are frequently used for planning periodontal surgery – periapical radiograph, bite-wing radiograph and transperiodontal probing – with the trans-surgical measurements. Thirty-four sites from twenty-one subjects were analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients between measurements obtained trans-surgically (gold standard) and those obtained by transperiodontal probing, periapical radiography and bite-wing radiography were determined. Average measurements were compared using the Wilcoxon test at a significance level of 0.05. Also, the frequency distribution of differences between test measurements and the gold standard was calculated. The results showed that transperiodontal probing (mean 2.05 mm) was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard (mean 1.97 mm), with no statistically significant difference observed. On the other hand, periapical and bite-wing radiographic mean values (1.56 mm and 1.72 mm, respectively) were smaller than the gold standard, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). It was concluded that transperiodontal probing was the most accurate measurement, as compared to the gold standard, followed by that obtained with the bite-wing radiograph. The clinical relevance of these results could be that planning for crown lengthening surgery should, preferably, include transperiodontal probing.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2010
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2011-06-09T06:00:03Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/29448
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1806-8324
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000766470
identifier_str_mv 1806-8324
000766470
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/29448
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Brazilian oral research. São Paulo. Vol. 24, no. 4 (Oct./Dec. 2010), p. 443-448
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/29448/2/000766470.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/29448/1/000766470.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/29448/3/000766470.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 778366c33f07195265cedc1cca8e62ba
ca63b2cfcfec49058b5f1d50206be276
8af7caa882f3847e6c1452bccb4c2b63
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224727176413184