Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/106743 |
Resumo: | Different reasons can contribute to classifying dental prosthesis wearers as high-risk individuals in relation to dental biofilm accumulation. These include a past history of oral disease, age and additional retentive areas. Other common complaints include inflammation and halitosis. Moreover, prosthesis replacement and prosthetic pillar loss are generally associated with caries and periodontal disease recurrence. Therefore, the present study undertook to make a critical review of the literature, aiming at discussing the main aspects related to chemical agent prescriptions for dental prosthesis wearers. Most of the articles were selected based on relevance, methods and availability in regard to the specific subject under investigation, without considering publication year limitations. Different types of prostheses and their impact on teeth and other oral tissues were reported. It was demonstrated that there is greater biofilm buildup and increased inflammatory levels in the presence of different types of prostheses, suggesting that additional measures are required both on population-wide and individual levels in order to control these factors. Mechanical control consists of a combination of manual or electric toothbrush and toothpaste, as well as specific devices for interdental cleaning. Although many chemical agents exhibit antimicrobial benefits when used for prosthesis disinfection, only a few agents can be used safely without causing damage. Regarding the selection of antiseptics by the overall population, chlorhexidine is the most indicated in the short term and in sporadic cases. The most indicated adjuncts to overcome the deficiencies and limitations of daily mechanical biofilm control are products containing essential oils as active ingredients. |
id |
UFRGS-2_a822c15e79eba238a7d0d52207afa393 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/106743 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Cortelli, Sheila CavalcaCosta, Fernando OliveiraRode, Sigmar de MelloHaas, Alex NogueiraAndrade, Ana Karina Pinto dePannuti, Cláudio MendesEscobar, Elaine CristinaAlmeida, Eliete Rodrigues deCortelli, José RobertoPedrazzi, Vinicius2014-11-12T02:14:28Z20141806-8324http://hdl.handle.net/10183/106743000936603Different reasons can contribute to classifying dental prosthesis wearers as high-risk individuals in relation to dental biofilm accumulation. These include a past history of oral disease, age and additional retentive areas. Other common complaints include inflammation and halitosis. Moreover, prosthesis replacement and prosthetic pillar loss are generally associated with caries and periodontal disease recurrence. Therefore, the present study undertook to make a critical review of the literature, aiming at discussing the main aspects related to chemical agent prescriptions for dental prosthesis wearers. Most of the articles were selected based on relevance, methods and availability in regard to the specific subject under investigation, without considering publication year limitations. Different types of prostheses and their impact on teeth and other oral tissues were reported. It was demonstrated that there is greater biofilm buildup and increased inflammatory levels in the presence of different types of prostheses, suggesting that additional measures are required both on population-wide and individual levels in order to control these factors. Mechanical control consists of a combination of manual or electric toothbrush and toothpaste, as well as specific devices for interdental cleaning. Although many chemical agents exhibit antimicrobial benefits when used for prosthesis disinfection, only a few agents can be used safely without causing damage. Regarding the selection of antiseptics by the overall population, chlorhexidine is the most indicated in the short term and in sporadic cases. The most indicated adjuncts to overcome the deficiencies and limitations of daily mechanical biofilm control are products containing essential oils as active ingredients.application/pdfengBrazilian oral research. São Paulo. Vol. 28, nesp (Jan. 2014), p. 1-9Antissépticos bucaisBiofilmesPrótese dentáriaMouthwashesBiofilmsDental prosthesisMouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patientsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000936603.pdf000936603.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1462753http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/106743/1/000936603.pdf8e3fe1a70664ea474d944d30fe60c37bMD51TEXT000936603.pdf.txt000936603.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain40363http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/106743/2/000936603.pdf.txtb9163c0b179f7282f51f188eded08b09MD52THUMBNAIL000936603.pdf.jpg000936603.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1805http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/106743/3/000936603.pdf.jpg8e88335c3e70e77bf2e7845e7c925292MD5310183/1067432018-10-22 07:47:51.427oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/106743Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2018-10-22T10:47:51Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients |
title |
Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients |
spellingShingle |
Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients Cortelli, Sheila Cavalca Antissépticos bucais Biofilmes Prótese dentária Mouthwashes Biofilms Dental prosthesis |
title_short |
Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients |
title_full |
Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients |
title_fullStr |
Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients |
title_sort |
Mouthrinse recommendation for prosthodontic patients |
author |
Cortelli, Sheila Cavalca |
author_facet |
Cortelli, Sheila Cavalca Costa, Fernando Oliveira Rode, Sigmar de Mello Haas, Alex Nogueira Andrade, Ana Karina Pinto de Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes Escobar, Elaine Cristina Almeida, Eliete Rodrigues de Cortelli, José Roberto Pedrazzi, Vinicius |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Costa, Fernando Oliveira Rode, Sigmar de Mello Haas, Alex Nogueira Andrade, Ana Karina Pinto de Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes Escobar, Elaine Cristina Almeida, Eliete Rodrigues de Cortelli, José Roberto Pedrazzi, Vinicius |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cortelli, Sheila Cavalca Costa, Fernando Oliveira Rode, Sigmar de Mello Haas, Alex Nogueira Andrade, Ana Karina Pinto de Pannuti, Cláudio Mendes Escobar, Elaine Cristina Almeida, Eliete Rodrigues de Cortelli, José Roberto Pedrazzi, Vinicius |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Antissépticos bucais Biofilmes Prótese dentária |
topic |
Antissépticos bucais Biofilmes Prótese dentária Mouthwashes Biofilms Dental prosthesis |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Mouthwashes Biofilms Dental prosthesis |
description |
Different reasons can contribute to classifying dental prosthesis wearers as high-risk individuals in relation to dental biofilm accumulation. These include a past history of oral disease, age and additional retentive areas. Other common complaints include inflammation and halitosis. Moreover, prosthesis replacement and prosthetic pillar loss are generally associated with caries and periodontal disease recurrence. Therefore, the present study undertook to make a critical review of the literature, aiming at discussing the main aspects related to chemical agent prescriptions for dental prosthesis wearers. Most of the articles were selected based on relevance, methods and availability in regard to the specific subject under investigation, without considering publication year limitations. Different types of prostheses and their impact on teeth and other oral tissues were reported. It was demonstrated that there is greater biofilm buildup and increased inflammatory levels in the presence of different types of prostheses, suggesting that additional measures are required both on population-wide and individual levels in order to control these factors. Mechanical control consists of a combination of manual or electric toothbrush and toothpaste, as well as specific devices for interdental cleaning. Although many chemical agents exhibit antimicrobial benefits when used for prosthesis disinfection, only a few agents can be used safely without causing damage. Regarding the selection of antiseptics by the overall population, chlorhexidine is the most indicated in the short term and in sporadic cases. The most indicated adjuncts to overcome the deficiencies and limitations of daily mechanical biofilm control are products containing essential oils as active ingredients. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2014-11-12T02:14:28Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2014 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/106743 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1806-8324 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
000936603 |
identifier_str_mv |
1806-8324 000936603 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/106743 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian oral research. São Paulo. Vol. 28, nesp (Jan. 2014), p. 1-9 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/106743/1/000936603.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/106743/2/000936603.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/106743/3/000936603.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
8e3fe1a70664ea474d944d30fe60c37b b9163c0b179f7282f51f188eded08b09 8e88335c3e70e77bf2e7845e7c925292 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447565160677376 |