Goodman e o projeto de uma definição construtiva de "indução válida"

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Eros Moreira de
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/195645
Resumo: Abstract. In Fact, Fiction and Forecast, Nelson Goodman claims that the problem of justifying induction is not something over and above the problem of describing valid induction. Such claim seems to open up the possibility that the new riddle of induction could be addressed empirically. Discoveries about psychological preferences for projecting certain classes of objects could function as a criterion for determining which predicates are after all projectible. In this paper, I argue that Goodman’s claim must be construed within his project for constructional definitions, which is methodologically oriented by reflective equilibrium. The description of inductive practice is committed to the articulation of the extension of the class selected by the predicate ‘valid induction’. The mutual adjustment between theoretical considerations and inductive practice involved in the proposal of a definition of ‘valid induction’ must preserve that practice as much as possible, there is no way to get rid of entrenchment. Empirical discoveries about the psychological mechanism that underlies projections may help that adjustment but they cannot substitute the role played by the entrenchment of predicates.
id UFRGS-2_ac18df404dcaad8542ccd4e7169257c7
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/195645
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Carvalho, Eros Moreira de2019-06-12T02:31:41Z20181414-4247http://hdl.handle.net/10183/195645001089531Abstract. In Fact, Fiction and Forecast, Nelson Goodman claims that the problem of justifying induction is not something over and above the problem of describing valid induction. Such claim seems to open up the possibility that the new riddle of induction could be addressed empirically. Discoveries about psychological preferences for projecting certain classes of objects could function as a criterion for determining which predicates are after all projectible. In this paper, I argue that Goodman’s claim must be construed within his project for constructional definitions, which is methodologically oriented by reflective equilibrium. The description of inductive practice is committed to the articulation of the extension of the class selected by the predicate ‘valid induction’. The mutual adjustment between theoretical considerations and inductive practice involved in the proposal of a definition of ‘valid induction’ must preserve that practice as much as possible, there is no way to get rid of entrenchment. Empirical discoveries about the psychological mechanism that underlies projections may help that adjustment but they cannot substitute the role played by the entrenchment of predicates.application/pdfporPrincipia : revista internacional de epistemologia. Florianópolis, SC. Vol. 22, n. 3 (dez. 2018), p. [439]-460Goodman, Nelson, 1906-1998. Fact, fiction and forecast - Fato, ficção e previsãoIndução (Filosofia)Definição (Filosofia)FilosofiaNelson Goodmanthe new riddle of inductionjustificationreflective equilibriumconstructional definitionGoodman e o projeto de uma definição construtiva de "indução válida"Goodman and the project of a constructional definition of "valid induction" info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001089531.pdf.txt001089531.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain70319http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/195645/2/001089531.pdf.txtb90fdd0bdba6f7a12d1afcb759b71e38MD52ORIGINAL001089531.pdfTexto completoapplication/pdf188894http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/195645/1/001089531.pdff1ddebd55a007c065ee3187de7155eadMD5110183/1956452023-09-21 03:39:03.202634oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/195645Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-09-21T06:39:03Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Goodman e o projeto de uma definição construtiva de "indução válida"
dc.title.alternative.en.fl_str_mv Goodman and the project of a constructional definition of "valid induction"
title Goodman e o projeto de uma definição construtiva de "indução válida"
spellingShingle Goodman e o projeto de uma definição construtiva de "indução válida"
Carvalho, Eros Moreira de
Goodman, Nelson, 1906-1998. Fact, fiction and forecast - Fato, ficção e previsão
Indução (Filosofia)
Definição (Filosofia)
Filosofia
Nelson Goodman
the new riddle of induction
justification
reflective equilibrium
constructional definition
title_short Goodman e o projeto de uma definição construtiva de "indução válida"
title_full Goodman e o projeto de uma definição construtiva de "indução válida"
title_fullStr Goodman e o projeto de uma definição construtiva de "indução válida"
title_full_unstemmed Goodman e o projeto de uma definição construtiva de "indução válida"
title_sort Goodman e o projeto de uma definição construtiva de "indução válida"
author Carvalho, Eros Moreira de
author_facet Carvalho, Eros Moreira de
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Eros Moreira de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Goodman, Nelson, 1906-1998. Fact, fiction and forecast - Fato, ficção e previsão
Indução (Filosofia)
Definição (Filosofia)
Filosofia
topic Goodman, Nelson, 1906-1998. Fact, fiction and forecast - Fato, ficção e previsão
Indução (Filosofia)
Definição (Filosofia)
Filosofia
Nelson Goodman
the new riddle of induction
justification
reflective equilibrium
constructional definition
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Nelson Goodman
the new riddle of induction
justification
reflective equilibrium
constructional definition
description Abstract. In Fact, Fiction and Forecast, Nelson Goodman claims that the problem of justifying induction is not something over and above the problem of describing valid induction. Such claim seems to open up the possibility that the new riddle of induction could be addressed empirically. Discoveries about psychological preferences for projecting certain classes of objects could function as a criterion for determining which predicates are after all projectible. In this paper, I argue that Goodman’s claim must be construed within his project for constructional definitions, which is methodologically oriented by reflective equilibrium. The description of inductive practice is committed to the articulation of the extension of the class selected by the predicate ‘valid induction’. The mutual adjustment between theoretical considerations and inductive practice involved in the proposal of a definition of ‘valid induction’ must preserve that practice as much as possible, there is no way to get rid of entrenchment. Empirical discoveries about the psychological mechanism that underlies projections may help that adjustment but they cannot substitute the role played by the entrenchment of predicates.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-06-12T02:31:41Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/195645
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1414-4247
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001089531
identifier_str_mv 1414-4247
001089531
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/195645
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Principia : revista internacional de epistemologia. Florianópolis, SC. Vol. 22, n. 3 (dez. 2018), p. [439]-460
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/195645/2/001089531.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/195645/1/001089531.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv b90fdd0bdba6f7a12d1afcb759b71e38
f1ddebd55a007c065ee3187de7155ead
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224968067874816