Is there a best endodontic treatment for immature necrotic permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Trabalho de conclusão de curso |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/183704 |
Resumo: | Aim: To systematically review the literature available to elucidate if there is a best endodontic treatment for immature necrotic permanent teeth. Methods: The literature was screened via PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials databases until August 2015 to select randomized clinical trials that compared at least two different treatments regarding immature necrotic permanent teeth comprising clinical and radiographic success as outcome. A total of 648 studies were retrieved from the databases, in which only 14 were selected to full-text analysis by appliance of inclusion criteria. After exclusion criteria, the remaining 7 studies had their data extracted and assessed for bias risk. Two reviewers independently performed the screening and evaluation of the articles. Pooled-effect estimates were obtained comparing clinical and radiographic success rates among MTA vs other treatments and Blood Clot vs other regenerative procedures. Results: MTA showed statistically significant better results when compared to other endodontic treatments (p < 0.05) regarding clinical and radiographic outcomes. On 3 the other hand, it was not found a significant difference when Blood Clot was compared to any other regenerative procedure. Conclusions: Necrotic immature teeth endodontic-treated with MTA plugs still present more reliable results when compared to any endodontic treatment, despite that there is in promising tendency to regenerative approaches. |
id |
UFRGS-2_b5d2afb61a22b1d1dd6b8fa2aef4dd39 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/183704 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Nicoloso, Gabriel FerreiraCasagrande, Luciano2018-10-20T03:15:36Z2015http://hdl.handle.net/10183/183704000988045Aim: To systematically review the literature available to elucidate if there is a best endodontic treatment for immature necrotic permanent teeth. Methods: The literature was screened via PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials databases until August 2015 to select randomized clinical trials that compared at least two different treatments regarding immature necrotic permanent teeth comprising clinical and radiographic success as outcome. A total of 648 studies were retrieved from the databases, in which only 14 were selected to full-text analysis by appliance of inclusion criteria. After exclusion criteria, the remaining 7 studies had their data extracted and assessed for bias risk. Two reviewers independently performed the screening and evaluation of the articles. Pooled-effect estimates were obtained comparing clinical and radiographic success rates among MTA vs other treatments and Blood Clot vs other regenerative procedures. Results: MTA showed statistically significant better results when compared to other endodontic treatments (p < 0.05) regarding clinical and radiographic outcomes. On 3 the other hand, it was not found a significant difference when Blood Clot was compared to any other regenerative procedure. Conclusions: Necrotic immature teeth endodontic-treated with MTA plugs still present more reliable results when compared to any endodontic treatment, despite that there is in promising tendency to regenerative approaches.application/pdfengDentes : PermanentesEndodontiaOdontopediatriaIs there a best endodontic treatment for immature necrotic permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesisUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do SulFaculdade de OdontologiaPorto Alegre, BR-RS2015especializaçãoCurso de Especialização em Odontopediatriainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000988045.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf4523071http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/183704/1/000988045.pdf4e6daf39cb50e0e62ab354d10e11eb3eMD51TEXT000988045.pdf.txt000988045.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain34051http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/183704/2/000988045.pdf.txt3ded0a4bbb3982f04a1df3bb27317f92MD52THUMBNAIL000988045.pdf.jpg000988045.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1894http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/183704/3/000988045.pdf.jpgdee412090c612f278214576a1424fbd6MD5310183/1837042021-05-26 04:33:59.967961oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/183704Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-05-26T07:33:59Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Is there a best endodontic treatment for immature necrotic permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
Is there a best endodontic treatment for immature necrotic permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
Is there a best endodontic treatment for immature necrotic permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis Nicoloso, Gabriel Ferreira Dentes : Permanentes Endodontia Odontopediatria |
title_short |
Is there a best endodontic treatment for immature necrotic permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
Is there a best endodontic treatment for immature necrotic permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
Is there a best endodontic treatment for immature necrotic permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is there a best endodontic treatment for immature necrotic permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
Is there a best endodontic treatment for immature necrotic permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Nicoloso, Gabriel Ferreira |
author_facet |
Nicoloso, Gabriel Ferreira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Nicoloso, Gabriel Ferreira |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Casagrande, Luciano |
contributor_str_mv |
Casagrande, Luciano |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dentes : Permanentes Endodontia Odontopediatria |
topic |
Dentes : Permanentes Endodontia Odontopediatria |
description |
Aim: To systematically review the literature available to elucidate if there is a best endodontic treatment for immature necrotic permanent teeth. Methods: The literature was screened via PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials databases until August 2015 to select randomized clinical trials that compared at least two different treatments regarding immature necrotic permanent teeth comprising clinical and radiographic success as outcome. A total of 648 studies were retrieved from the databases, in which only 14 were selected to full-text analysis by appliance of inclusion criteria. After exclusion criteria, the remaining 7 studies had their data extracted and assessed for bias risk. Two reviewers independently performed the screening and evaluation of the articles. Pooled-effect estimates were obtained comparing clinical and radiographic success rates among MTA vs other treatments and Blood Clot vs other regenerative procedures. Results: MTA showed statistically significant better results when compared to other endodontic treatments (p < 0.05) regarding clinical and radiographic outcomes. On 3 the other hand, it was not found a significant difference when Blood Clot was compared to any other regenerative procedure. Conclusions: Necrotic immature teeth endodontic-treated with MTA plugs still present more reliable results when compared to any endodontic treatment, despite that there is in promising tendency to regenerative approaches. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2015 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-10-20T03:15:36Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis |
format |
bachelorThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/183704 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
000988045 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/183704 |
identifier_str_mv |
000988045 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/183704/1/000988045.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/183704/2/000988045.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/183704/3/000988045.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
4e6daf39cb50e0e62ab354d10e11eb3e 3ded0a4bbb3982f04a1df3bb27317f92 dee412090c612f278214576a1424fbd6 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1801224560379428864 |