Land use explains the distribution of threatened new world amphibians better than climate

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Brum, Fernanda Thiesen
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Gonçalves, Larissa Oliveira, Cappelatti, Laura, Carlucci, Marcos Bergmann, Debastiani, Vanderlei Julio, Salengue, Elisa Viana, Seger, Guilherme Dubal dos Santos, Both, Camila Chiamenti, Silva, Jorge Sebastião Bernardo, Loyola, Rafael Dias, Duarte, Leandro da Silva
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/115300
Resumo: Background: We evaluated the direct and indirect influence of climate, land use, phylogenetic structure, species richness and endemism on the distribution of New World threatened amphibians. Methodology/Principal Findings: We used the WWF’s New World ecoregions, the WWFs amphibian distributional data and the IUCN Red List Categories to obtain the number of threatened species per ecoregion. We analyzed three different scenarios urgent, moderate, and the most inclusive scenario. Using path analysis we evaluated the direct and indirect effects of climate, type of land use, phylogenetic structure, richness and endemism on the number of threatened amphibians in New World ecoregions. In all scenarios we found strong support for direct influences of endemism, the cover of villages and species richness on the number of threatened species in each ecoregion. The proportion of wild area had indirect effects in the moderate and the most inclusive scenario. Phylogenetic composition was important in determining the species richness and endemism in each ecoregion. Climate variables had complex and indirect effects on the number of threatened species. Conclusion/Significance: Land use has a more direct influence than climate in determining the distribution of New World threatened amphibians. Independently of the scenario analyzed, the main variables influencing the distribution of threatened amphibians were consistent, with endemism having the largest magnitude path coefficient. The importance of phylogenetic composition could indicate that some clades may be more threatened than others, and their presence increases the number of threatened species. Our results highlight the importance of man-made land transformation, which is a local variable, as a critical factor underlying the distribution of threatened amphibians at a biogeographic scale.
id UFRGS-2_b80d816f4911dc894576812b96598fa2
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/115300
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Brum, Fernanda ThiesenGonçalves, Larissa OliveiraCappelatti, LauraCarlucci, Marcos BergmannDebastiani, Vanderlei JulioSalengue, Elisa VianaSeger, Guilherme Dubal dos SantosBoth, Camila ChiamentiSilva, Jorge Sebastião BernardoLoyola, Rafael DiasDuarte, Leandro da Silva2015-04-14T01:57:51Z20131932-6203http://hdl.handle.net/10183/115300000930645Background: We evaluated the direct and indirect influence of climate, land use, phylogenetic structure, species richness and endemism on the distribution of New World threatened amphibians. Methodology/Principal Findings: We used the WWF’s New World ecoregions, the WWFs amphibian distributional data and the IUCN Red List Categories to obtain the number of threatened species per ecoregion. We analyzed three different scenarios urgent, moderate, and the most inclusive scenario. Using path analysis we evaluated the direct and indirect effects of climate, type of land use, phylogenetic structure, richness and endemism on the number of threatened amphibians in New World ecoregions. In all scenarios we found strong support for direct influences of endemism, the cover of villages and species richness on the number of threatened species in each ecoregion. The proportion of wild area had indirect effects in the moderate and the most inclusive scenario. Phylogenetic composition was important in determining the species richness and endemism in each ecoregion. Climate variables had complex and indirect effects on the number of threatened species. Conclusion/Significance: Land use has a more direct influence than climate in determining the distribution of New World threatened amphibians. Independently of the scenario analyzed, the main variables influencing the distribution of threatened amphibians were consistent, with endemism having the largest magnitude path coefficient. The importance of phylogenetic composition could indicate that some clades may be more threatened than others, and their presence increases the number of threatened species. Our results highlight the importance of man-made land transformation, which is a local variable, as a critical factor underlying the distribution of threatened amphibians at a biogeographic scale.application/pdfengPLoS ONE. San Francisco. Vol. 8, no. 4 (Apr. 2013), e60742, 7 p.AnfíbiosDinâmica populacionalMudanças climáticasLand use explains the distribution of threatened new world amphibians better than climateEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000930645.pdf000930645.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf864840http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115300/1/000930645.pdfee80e820202d30e6699c7e6634c039fbMD51TEXT000930645.pdf.txt000930645.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain39208http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115300/2/000930645.pdf.txt067c8d0731863ea2e6749fcafa9c9efcMD52THUMBNAIL000930645.pdf.jpg000930645.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2130http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115300/3/000930645.pdf.jpgf606a5f22db448271cd056ca001fccaaMD5310183/1153002023-09-23 03:35:45.309862oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/115300Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2023-09-23T06:35:45Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Land use explains the distribution of threatened new world amphibians better than climate
title Land use explains the distribution of threatened new world amphibians better than climate
spellingShingle Land use explains the distribution of threatened new world amphibians better than climate
Brum, Fernanda Thiesen
Anfíbios
Dinâmica populacional
Mudanças climáticas
title_short Land use explains the distribution of threatened new world amphibians better than climate
title_full Land use explains the distribution of threatened new world amphibians better than climate
title_fullStr Land use explains the distribution of threatened new world amphibians better than climate
title_full_unstemmed Land use explains the distribution of threatened new world amphibians better than climate
title_sort Land use explains the distribution of threatened new world amphibians better than climate
author Brum, Fernanda Thiesen
author_facet Brum, Fernanda Thiesen
Gonçalves, Larissa Oliveira
Cappelatti, Laura
Carlucci, Marcos Bergmann
Debastiani, Vanderlei Julio
Salengue, Elisa Viana
Seger, Guilherme Dubal dos Santos
Both, Camila Chiamenti
Silva, Jorge Sebastião Bernardo
Loyola, Rafael Dias
Duarte, Leandro da Silva
author_role author
author2 Gonçalves, Larissa Oliveira
Cappelatti, Laura
Carlucci, Marcos Bergmann
Debastiani, Vanderlei Julio
Salengue, Elisa Viana
Seger, Guilherme Dubal dos Santos
Both, Camila Chiamenti
Silva, Jorge Sebastião Bernardo
Loyola, Rafael Dias
Duarte, Leandro da Silva
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Brum, Fernanda Thiesen
Gonçalves, Larissa Oliveira
Cappelatti, Laura
Carlucci, Marcos Bergmann
Debastiani, Vanderlei Julio
Salengue, Elisa Viana
Seger, Guilherme Dubal dos Santos
Both, Camila Chiamenti
Silva, Jorge Sebastião Bernardo
Loyola, Rafael Dias
Duarte, Leandro da Silva
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anfíbios
Dinâmica populacional
Mudanças climáticas
topic Anfíbios
Dinâmica populacional
Mudanças climáticas
description Background: We evaluated the direct and indirect influence of climate, land use, phylogenetic structure, species richness and endemism on the distribution of New World threatened amphibians. Methodology/Principal Findings: We used the WWF’s New World ecoregions, the WWFs amphibian distributional data and the IUCN Red List Categories to obtain the number of threatened species per ecoregion. We analyzed three different scenarios urgent, moderate, and the most inclusive scenario. Using path analysis we evaluated the direct and indirect effects of climate, type of land use, phylogenetic structure, richness and endemism on the number of threatened amphibians in New World ecoregions. In all scenarios we found strong support for direct influences of endemism, the cover of villages and species richness on the number of threatened species in each ecoregion. The proportion of wild area had indirect effects in the moderate and the most inclusive scenario. Phylogenetic composition was important in determining the species richness and endemism in each ecoregion. Climate variables had complex and indirect effects on the number of threatened species. Conclusion/Significance: Land use has a more direct influence than climate in determining the distribution of New World threatened amphibians. Independently of the scenario analyzed, the main variables influencing the distribution of threatened amphibians were consistent, with endemism having the largest magnitude path coefficient. The importance of phylogenetic composition could indicate that some clades may be more threatened than others, and their presence increases the number of threatened species. Our results highlight the importance of man-made land transformation, which is a local variable, as a critical factor underlying the distribution of threatened amphibians at a biogeographic scale.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2013
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2015-04-14T01:57:51Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/115300
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1932-6203
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000930645
identifier_str_mv 1932-6203
000930645
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/115300
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv PLoS ONE. San Francisco. Vol. 8, no. 4 (Apr. 2013), e60742, 7 p.
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115300/1/000930645.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115300/2/000930645.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/115300/3/000930645.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv ee80e820202d30e6699c7e6634c039fb
067c8d0731863ea2e6749fcafa9c9efc
f606a5f22db448271cd056ca001fccaa
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224868597858304