The hypnotic analgesia suggestion mitigated the effect of the transcranial direct current stimulation on the descending pain modulatory system : a proof of concept study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Serrano, Gerardo Vinicio Beltran
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Rodrigues, Laura Pooch, Corrêa, Bruno Schein Cavalheiro, Zortéa, Maxciel, Torres, Iraci Lucena da Silva, Fregni, Felipe, Caumo, Wolnei
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217323
Resumo: Objective: We evaluated whether active(a)-tDCS combined with hypnotic analgesia suggestion (HS) would be more effective than a single active(a)-tDCS, and/or sham-(s)-tDCS and s-tDCS/HS on the following outcomes: function of descending pain modulatory system (DPMS) during the conditioned pain modulation test (CPM-test) (primary outcome), heat pain threshold (HPT), heat pain tolerance (HPTo) and cold pressor test (CPT) (secondary outcomes). We also examined whether their effects are related to neuroplasticity state evaluated by serum brain-derived-neurotropic factor (BDNF). Materials and Methods: Forty-eight females received one session of one of the four interventions (a-tDCS/HS, s-tDCS/HS, a-tDCS, and s-tDCS) in an incomplete randomized crossover sequence. The a-tDCS or s-tDCS was applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for 30 minutes at 2mA. Results: A generalized linear model revealed a significant main effect for the intervention group (P <0.032). The delta-(Δ) pain score on the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS0-10) during CPM-test in the a-tDCS/HS group was −0.25 (0.43). The (Δ) pain score on NPS (0–10) during CPM-test in the other three groups was a-tDCS=−0.54 (0.41), HS −0.01 (0.41) and stDCS/HS=−0.19 (0.43). A-tDCS/HS intervention increased the CPT substantially compared to all other interventions. Also, higher baseline levels of BDNF were associated with a larger change in CPT and HPTo. Conclusion: These findings indicate that the HS combined with a-tDCS mitigated the effect of the a-tDCS on the DPMS. The a-tDCS up-regulates the inhibition on DPMS, and the HS improved pain tolerance. And, together they enhanced the reaction time substantially upon the CPT.
id UFRGS-2_b92e75f4c23a8202c0ed187bac296f8d
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/217323
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Serrano, Gerardo Vinicio BeltranRodrigues, Laura PoochCorrêa, Bruno Schein CavalheiroZortéa, MaxcielTorres, Iraci Lucena da SilvaFregni, FelipeCaumo, Wolnei2021-01-14T04:11:21Z20201178-7090http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217323001119859Objective: We evaluated whether active(a)-tDCS combined with hypnotic analgesia suggestion (HS) would be more effective than a single active(a)-tDCS, and/or sham-(s)-tDCS and s-tDCS/HS on the following outcomes: function of descending pain modulatory system (DPMS) during the conditioned pain modulation test (CPM-test) (primary outcome), heat pain threshold (HPT), heat pain tolerance (HPTo) and cold pressor test (CPT) (secondary outcomes). We also examined whether their effects are related to neuroplasticity state evaluated by serum brain-derived-neurotropic factor (BDNF). Materials and Methods: Forty-eight females received one session of one of the four interventions (a-tDCS/HS, s-tDCS/HS, a-tDCS, and s-tDCS) in an incomplete randomized crossover sequence. The a-tDCS or s-tDCS was applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for 30 minutes at 2mA. Results: A generalized linear model revealed a significant main effect for the intervention group (P <0.032). The delta-(Δ) pain score on the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS0-10) during CPM-test in the a-tDCS/HS group was −0.25 (0.43). The (Δ) pain score on NPS (0–10) during CPM-test in the other three groups was a-tDCS=−0.54 (0.41), HS −0.01 (0.41) and stDCS/HS=−0.19 (0.43). A-tDCS/HS intervention increased the CPT substantially compared to all other interventions. Also, higher baseline levels of BDNF were associated with a larger change in CPT and HPTo. Conclusion: These findings indicate that the HS combined with a-tDCS mitigated the effect of the a-tDCS on the DPMS. The a-tDCS up-regulates the inhibition on DPMS, and the HS improved pain tolerance. And, together they enhanced the reaction time substantially upon the CPT.application/pdfengJournal of pain research. Auckland. Vol. 13 (2020), p. 2297–2311Estimulação transcraniana por corrente contínuaHipnóticos e sedativosDortDCSHypnotic analgesiaConditioned pain modulationPain perceptionThe hypnotic analgesia suggestion mitigated the effect of the transcranial direct current stimulation on the descending pain modulatory system : a proof of concept studyEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001119859.pdf.txt001119859.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain72701http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217323/2/001119859.pdf.txt35bfc72a12b6cd46c8b2273c44a32c0aMD52ORIGINAL001119859.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1583923http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217323/1/001119859.pdf23ec475b53c7e81be1f2c22df7c01792MD5110183/2173232021-03-09 04:44:52.894647oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/217323Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-03-09T07:44:52Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv The hypnotic analgesia suggestion mitigated the effect of the transcranial direct current stimulation on the descending pain modulatory system : a proof of concept study
title The hypnotic analgesia suggestion mitigated the effect of the transcranial direct current stimulation on the descending pain modulatory system : a proof of concept study
spellingShingle The hypnotic analgesia suggestion mitigated the effect of the transcranial direct current stimulation on the descending pain modulatory system : a proof of concept study
Serrano, Gerardo Vinicio Beltran
Estimulação transcraniana por corrente contínua
Hipnóticos e sedativos
Dor
tDCS
Hypnotic analgesia
Conditioned pain modulation
Pain perception
title_short The hypnotic analgesia suggestion mitigated the effect of the transcranial direct current stimulation on the descending pain modulatory system : a proof of concept study
title_full The hypnotic analgesia suggestion mitigated the effect of the transcranial direct current stimulation on the descending pain modulatory system : a proof of concept study
title_fullStr The hypnotic analgesia suggestion mitigated the effect of the transcranial direct current stimulation on the descending pain modulatory system : a proof of concept study
title_full_unstemmed The hypnotic analgesia suggestion mitigated the effect of the transcranial direct current stimulation on the descending pain modulatory system : a proof of concept study
title_sort The hypnotic analgesia suggestion mitigated the effect of the transcranial direct current stimulation on the descending pain modulatory system : a proof of concept study
author Serrano, Gerardo Vinicio Beltran
author_facet Serrano, Gerardo Vinicio Beltran
Rodrigues, Laura Pooch
Corrêa, Bruno Schein Cavalheiro
Zortéa, Maxciel
Torres, Iraci Lucena da Silva
Fregni, Felipe
Caumo, Wolnei
author_role author
author2 Rodrigues, Laura Pooch
Corrêa, Bruno Schein Cavalheiro
Zortéa, Maxciel
Torres, Iraci Lucena da Silva
Fregni, Felipe
Caumo, Wolnei
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Serrano, Gerardo Vinicio Beltran
Rodrigues, Laura Pooch
Corrêa, Bruno Schein Cavalheiro
Zortéa, Maxciel
Torres, Iraci Lucena da Silva
Fregni, Felipe
Caumo, Wolnei
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Estimulação transcraniana por corrente contínua
Hipnóticos e sedativos
Dor
topic Estimulação transcraniana por corrente contínua
Hipnóticos e sedativos
Dor
tDCS
Hypnotic analgesia
Conditioned pain modulation
Pain perception
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv tDCS
Hypnotic analgesia
Conditioned pain modulation
Pain perception
description Objective: We evaluated whether active(a)-tDCS combined with hypnotic analgesia suggestion (HS) would be more effective than a single active(a)-tDCS, and/or sham-(s)-tDCS and s-tDCS/HS on the following outcomes: function of descending pain modulatory system (DPMS) during the conditioned pain modulation test (CPM-test) (primary outcome), heat pain threshold (HPT), heat pain tolerance (HPTo) and cold pressor test (CPT) (secondary outcomes). We also examined whether their effects are related to neuroplasticity state evaluated by serum brain-derived-neurotropic factor (BDNF). Materials and Methods: Forty-eight females received one session of one of the four interventions (a-tDCS/HS, s-tDCS/HS, a-tDCS, and s-tDCS) in an incomplete randomized crossover sequence. The a-tDCS or s-tDCS was applied over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for 30 minutes at 2mA. Results: A generalized linear model revealed a significant main effect for the intervention group (P <0.032). The delta-(Δ) pain score on the Numerical Pain Scale (NPS0-10) during CPM-test in the a-tDCS/HS group was −0.25 (0.43). The (Δ) pain score on NPS (0–10) during CPM-test in the other three groups was a-tDCS=−0.54 (0.41), HS −0.01 (0.41) and stDCS/HS=−0.19 (0.43). A-tDCS/HS intervention increased the CPT substantially compared to all other interventions. Also, higher baseline levels of BDNF were associated with a larger change in CPT and HPTo. Conclusion: These findings indicate that the HS combined with a-tDCS mitigated the effect of the a-tDCS on the DPMS. The a-tDCS up-regulates the inhibition on DPMS, and the HS improved pain tolerance. And, together they enhanced the reaction time substantially upon the CPT.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-01-14T04:11:21Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217323
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1178-7090
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001119859
identifier_str_mv 1178-7090
001119859
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/217323
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Journal of pain research. Auckland. Vol. 13 (2020), p. 2297–2311
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217323/2/001119859.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/217323/1/001119859.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 35bfc72a12b6cd46c8b2273c44a32c0a
23ec475b53c7e81be1f2c22df7c01792
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1815447730746556416