National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/170832 |
Resumo: | This article compares the intelligence systems of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Three questions drive the research: How are the national intelligence systems organized? How is power distributed among organizations in each country? What are the organizational risks? By employing Network Analysis to publicly-available data on intelligence agencies, collegiate bodies, and supervising organizations, authority relations and information flows were mapped. Regarding organizational configuration, similarities were found between India and Russia, as well as between China and South Africa. Brazil differs from the four countries. As for the power distribution, in Russia, Brazil, and India intelligence is subordinated to the government, and shows more centrality in the cases of China and South Africa. Finally, Russia runs the highest risk of having an intelligence system less able to adapt to strategic circumstances, at the same time being the most resilient among the five countries. Likewise, China has the highest risk of a single actor being able to retain information, acting as a gatekeeper. Network Analysis has proved to be a useful approach to promote a comparative research program in the Intelligence Studies field. |
id |
UFRGS-2_c5f3e335d65550078f4db9af8e08c67d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/170832 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Cepik, Marco Aurelio ChavesMöller, Gustavo2017-12-05T02:22:20Z20171981-3821http://hdl.handle.net/10183/170832001048011This article compares the intelligence systems of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Three questions drive the research: How are the national intelligence systems organized? How is power distributed among organizations in each country? What are the organizational risks? By employing Network Analysis to publicly-available data on intelligence agencies, collegiate bodies, and supervising organizations, authority relations and information flows were mapped. Regarding organizational configuration, similarities were found between India and Russia, as well as between China and South Africa. Brazil differs from the four countries. As for the power distribution, in Russia, Brazil, and India intelligence is subordinated to the government, and shows more centrality in the cases of China and South Africa. Finally, Russia runs the highest risk of having an intelligence system less able to adapt to strategic circumstances, at the same time being the most resilient among the five countries. Likewise, China has the highest risk of a single actor being able to retain information, acting as a gatekeeper. Network Analysis has proved to be a useful approach to promote a comparative research program in the Intelligence Studies field.application/pdfengBrazilian Political Science Review. São Paulo, SP. Vol. 11, n. 1 (2017), p. 1-26Segurança nacionalBrasilRússiaÍndiaChinaÁfrica do SulBRICSIntelligenceNetwork analysisPower distributionNational intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001048011.pdf001048011.pdfTexto completoapplication/pdf661489http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/170832/1/001048011.pdf91ff32ee5533f838fcff6c1b4d5893ffMD51TEXT001048011.pdf.txt001048011.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain73348http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/170832/2/001048011.pdf.txt0620c586e3f23883590fd05b6a114f60MD5210183/1708322017-12-06 02:28:48.249976oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/170832Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.bropendoar:2017-12-06T04:28:48Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa |
title |
National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa |
spellingShingle |
National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa Cepik, Marco Aurelio Chaves Segurança nacional Brasil Rússia Índia China África do Sul BRICS Intelligence Network analysis Power distribution |
title_short |
National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa |
title_full |
National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa |
title_fullStr |
National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa |
title_sort |
National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa |
author |
Cepik, Marco Aurelio Chaves |
author_facet |
Cepik, Marco Aurelio Chaves Möller, Gustavo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Möller, Gustavo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cepik, Marco Aurelio Chaves Möller, Gustavo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Segurança nacional Brasil Rússia Índia China África do Sul |
topic |
Segurança nacional Brasil Rússia Índia China África do Sul BRICS Intelligence Network analysis Power distribution |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
BRICS Intelligence Network analysis Power distribution |
description |
This article compares the intelligence systems of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Three questions drive the research: How are the national intelligence systems organized? How is power distributed among organizations in each country? What are the organizational risks? By employing Network Analysis to publicly-available data on intelligence agencies, collegiate bodies, and supervising organizations, authority relations and information flows were mapped. Regarding organizational configuration, similarities were found between India and Russia, as well as between China and South Africa. Brazil differs from the four countries. As for the power distribution, in Russia, Brazil, and India intelligence is subordinated to the government, and shows more centrality in the cases of China and South Africa. Finally, Russia runs the highest risk of having an intelligence system less able to adapt to strategic circumstances, at the same time being the most resilient among the five countries. Likewise, China has the highest risk of a single actor being able to retain information, acting as a gatekeeper. Network Analysis has proved to be a useful approach to promote a comparative research program in the Intelligence Studies field. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-05T02:22:20Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2017 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/170832 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1981-3821 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001048011 |
identifier_str_mv |
1981-3821 001048011 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/170832 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Political Science Review. São Paulo, SP. Vol. 11, n. 1 (2017), p. 1-26 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/170832/1/001048011.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/170832/2/001048011.pdf.txt |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
91ff32ee5533f838fcff6c1b4d5893ff 0620c586e3f23883590fd05b6a114f60 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
lume@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1817725014333456384 |