National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cepik, Marco Aurelio Chaves
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Möller, Gustavo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/170832
Resumo: This article compares the intelligence systems of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Three questions drive the research: How are the national intelligence systems organized? How is power distributed among organizations in each country? What are the organizational risks? By employing Network Analysis to publicly-available data on intelligence agencies, collegiate bodies, and supervising organizations, authority relations and information flows were mapped. Regarding organizational configuration, similarities were found between India and Russia, as well as between China and South Africa. Brazil differs from the four countries. As for the power distribution, in Russia, Brazil, and India intelligence is subordinated to the government, and shows more centrality in the cases of China and South Africa. Finally, Russia runs the highest risk of having an intelligence system less able to adapt to strategic circumstances, at the same time being the most resilient among the five countries. Likewise, China has the highest risk of a single actor being able to retain information, acting as a gatekeeper. Network Analysis has proved to be a useful approach to promote a comparative research program in the Intelligence Studies field.
id UFRGS-2_c5f3e335d65550078f4db9af8e08c67d
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/170832
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Cepik, Marco Aurelio ChavesMöller, Gustavo2017-12-05T02:22:20Z20171981-3821http://hdl.handle.net/10183/170832001048011This article compares the intelligence systems of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Three questions drive the research: How are the national intelligence systems organized? How is power distributed among organizations in each country? What are the organizational risks? By employing Network Analysis to publicly-available data on intelligence agencies, collegiate bodies, and supervising organizations, authority relations and information flows were mapped. Regarding organizational configuration, similarities were found between India and Russia, as well as between China and South Africa. Brazil differs from the four countries. As for the power distribution, in Russia, Brazil, and India intelligence is subordinated to the government, and shows more centrality in the cases of China and South Africa. Finally, Russia runs the highest risk of having an intelligence system less able to adapt to strategic circumstances, at the same time being the most resilient among the five countries. Likewise, China has the highest risk of a single actor being able to retain information, acting as a gatekeeper. Network Analysis has proved to be a useful approach to promote a comparative research program in the Intelligence Studies field.application/pdfengBrazilian Political Science Review. São Paulo, SP. Vol. 11, n. 1 (2017), p. 1-26Segurança nacionalBrasilRússiaÍndiaChinaÁfrica do SulBRICSIntelligenceNetwork analysisPower distributionNational intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001048011.pdf001048011.pdfTexto completoapplication/pdf661489http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/170832/1/001048011.pdf91ff32ee5533f838fcff6c1b4d5893ffMD51TEXT001048011.pdf.txt001048011.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain73348http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/170832/2/001048011.pdf.txt0620c586e3f23883590fd05b6a114f60MD5210183/1708322017-12-06 02:28:48.249976oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/170832Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.bropendoar:2017-12-06T04:28:48Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
title National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
spellingShingle National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
Cepik, Marco Aurelio Chaves
Segurança nacional
Brasil
Rússia
Índia
China
África do Sul
BRICS
Intelligence
Network analysis
Power distribution
title_short National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
title_full National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
title_fullStr National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
title_full_unstemmed National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
title_sort National intelligence systems as networks : power distribution and organizational risk in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa
author Cepik, Marco Aurelio Chaves
author_facet Cepik, Marco Aurelio Chaves
Möller, Gustavo
author_role author
author2 Möller, Gustavo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cepik, Marco Aurelio Chaves
Möller, Gustavo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Segurança nacional
Brasil
Rússia
Índia
China
África do Sul
topic Segurança nacional
Brasil
Rússia
Índia
China
África do Sul
BRICS
Intelligence
Network analysis
Power distribution
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv BRICS
Intelligence
Network analysis
Power distribution
description This article compares the intelligence systems of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. Three questions drive the research: How are the national intelligence systems organized? How is power distributed among organizations in each country? What are the organizational risks? By employing Network Analysis to publicly-available data on intelligence agencies, collegiate bodies, and supervising organizations, authority relations and information flows were mapped. Regarding organizational configuration, similarities were found between India and Russia, as well as between China and South Africa. Brazil differs from the four countries. As for the power distribution, in Russia, Brazil, and India intelligence is subordinated to the government, and shows more centrality in the cases of China and South Africa. Finally, Russia runs the highest risk of having an intelligence system less able to adapt to strategic circumstances, at the same time being the most resilient among the five countries. Likewise, China has the highest risk of a single actor being able to retain information, acting as a gatekeeper. Network Analysis has proved to be a useful approach to promote a comparative research program in the Intelligence Studies field.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-12-05T02:22:20Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/170832
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1981-3821
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001048011
identifier_str_mv 1981-3821
001048011
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/170832
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review. São Paulo, SP. Vol. 11, n. 1 (2017), p. 1-26
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/170832/1/001048011.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/170832/2/001048011.pdf.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 91ff32ee5533f838fcff6c1b4d5893ff
0620c586e3f23883590fd05b6a114f60
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lume@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1817725014333456384