Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/187344 |
Resumo: | Bacterial contamination remains the major problem in skin banks, even after antimicrobial treatment, and results in high rates of tissue discarding. This study aimed to analyze bacterial contamination in 32 human skin allografts from the skin bank of Dr. Roberto Corrêa Chem from the Hospital Complex Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre. These samples were already discarded due to microbial contamination. The identification of the bacteria isolated from skin allografts was performed by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight. The antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates to six different classes of antimicrobials was determined using the diskdiffusion agar method, and the evaluation of the inhibitory potential was determined by the minimal inhibitory concentration (50/90) of antimicrobials already used in the skin bank and those that most isolates were susceptible to. A total of 21 (65.6%) skin samples were contaminated with Gram-positive bacteria: 1 (4.7%) with Paenibacillus sp., 12 (61.9%) with Bacillus sp., 6 (28.5%) with Staphylococcus sp., and 2 (9.5%) with Bacillus sp. and Staphylococcus sp. Several resistance profiles, including multiresistance, were found among the isolates. Most of the isolates were susceptible to at least one of the antimicrobials used in the skin bank. All isolates were susceptible to amikacin, gentamicin, and tetracycline, which demonstrated the best inhibitory activities against the isolates and were considered as potential candidates for new antimicrobial treatments. Bacillus, Paenibacillus, and Staphylococcus were isolated from the skin allografts, thus demonstrating the predominance of Gram-positive bacteria contamination. Other factors not related to the resistance phenotype may also be involved in the persistence of bacterial isolates in the skin allografts after antibiotic treatment. Gentamicin, amikacin, and tetracycline can be considered as an option for a more effective treatment cocktail. |
id |
UFRGS-2_d3d2cad3af70c52b709197c567b91ffa |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/187344 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Meneghetti, Karine LenaCanabarro, Micaela do CantoOtton, Letícia MunerHain, Thaís dos SantosGeimba, Mercedes PassosCorção, Gertrudes2018-12-22T04:07:08Z20181471-2091http://hdl.handle.net/10183/187344001082504Bacterial contamination remains the major problem in skin banks, even after antimicrobial treatment, and results in high rates of tissue discarding. This study aimed to analyze bacterial contamination in 32 human skin allografts from the skin bank of Dr. Roberto Corrêa Chem from the Hospital Complex Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre. These samples were already discarded due to microbial contamination. The identification of the bacteria isolated from skin allografts was performed by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight. The antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates to six different classes of antimicrobials was determined using the diskdiffusion agar method, and the evaluation of the inhibitory potential was determined by the minimal inhibitory concentration (50/90) of antimicrobials already used in the skin bank and those that most isolates were susceptible to. A total of 21 (65.6%) skin samples were contaminated with Gram-positive bacteria: 1 (4.7%) with Paenibacillus sp., 12 (61.9%) with Bacillus sp., 6 (28.5%) with Staphylococcus sp., and 2 (9.5%) with Bacillus sp. and Staphylococcus sp. Several resistance profiles, including multiresistance, were found among the isolates. Most of the isolates were susceptible to at least one of the antimicrobials used in the skin bank. All isolates were susceptible to amikacin, gentamicin, and tetracycline, which demonstrated the best inhibitory activities against the isolates and were considered as potential candidates for new antimicrobial treatments. Bacillus, Paenibacillus, and Staphylococcus were isolated from the skin allografts, thus demonstrating the predominance of Gram-positive bacteria contamination. Other factors not related to the resistance phenotype may also be involved in the persistence of bacterial isolates in the skin allografts after antibiotic treatment. Gentamicin, amikacin, and tetracycline can be considered as an option for a more effective treatment cocktail.application/pdfengBMC Microbiology. London. Vol. 18, no. 121 (Sep. 2018), p. 1-9Curativos biológicosAloenxertosResistência microbiana a medicamentosBancos de tecidosSkin allograftBacterial contaminationAntimicrobial resistanceSkin bankDiscardsBacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problemEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001082504.pdf.txt001082504.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain48793http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/187344/2/001082504.pdf.txt7e3f92cecb75e690bdf7102fc766d488MD52ORIGINAL001082504.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf635357http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/187344/1/001082504.pdfdeae5d8810c2e4335f2fdb3540f95d4dMD5110183/1873442019-03-02 02:31:53.455347oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/187344Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2019-03-02T05:31:53Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem |
title |
Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem |
spellingShingle |
Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem Meneghetti, Karine Lena Curativos biológicos Aloenxertos Resistência microbiana a medicamentos Bancos de tecidos Skin allograft Bacterial contamination Antimicrobial resistance Skin bank Discards |
title_short |
Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem |
title_full |
Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem |
title_fullStr |
Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem |
title_sort |
Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem |
author |
Meneghetti, Karine Lena |
author_facet |
Meneghetti, Karine Lena Canabarro, Micaela do Canto Otton, Letícia Muner Hain, Thaís dos Santos Geimba, Mercedes Passos Corção, Gertrudes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Canabarro, Micaela do Canto Otton, Letícia Muner Hain, Thaís dos Santos Geimba, Mercedes Passos Corção, Gertrudes |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Meneghetti, Karine Lena Canabarro, Micaela do Canto Otton, Letícia Muner Hain, Thaís dos Santos Geimba, Mercedes Passos Corção, Gertrudes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Curativos biológicos Aloenxertos Resistência microbiana a medicamentos Bancos de tecidos |
topic |
Curativos biológicos Aloenxertos Resistência microbiana a medicamentos Bancos de tecidos Skin allograft Bacterial contamination Antimicrobial resistance Skin bank Discards |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Skin allograft Bacterial contamination Antimicrobial resistance Skin bank Discards |
description |
Bacterial contamination remains the major problem in skin banks, even after antimicrobial treatment, and results in high rates of tissue discarding. This study aimed to analyze bacterial contamination in 32 human skin allografts from the skin bank of Dr. Roberto Corrêa Chem from the Hospital Complex Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre. These samples were already discarded due to microbial contamination. The identification of the bacteria isolated from skin allografts was performed by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight. The antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates to six different classes of antimicrobials was determined using the diskdiffusion agar method, and the evaluation of the inhibitory potential was determined by the minimal inhibitory concentration (50/90) of antimicrobials already used in the skin bank and those that most isolates were susceptible to. A total of 21 (65.6%) skin samples were contaminated with Gram-positive bacteria: 1 (4.7%) with Paenibacillus sp., 12 (61.9%) with Bacillus sp., 6 (28.5%) with Staphylococcus sp., and 2 (9.5%) with Bacillus sp. and Staphylococcus sp. Several resistance profiles, including multiresistance, were found among the isolates. Most of the isolates were susceptible to at least one of the antimicrobials used in the skin bank. All isolates were susceptible to amikacin, gentamicin, and tetracycline, which demonstrated the best inhibitory activities against the isolates and were considered as potential candidates for new antimicrobial treatments. Bacillus, Paenibacillus, and Staphylococcus were isolated from the skin allografts, thus demonstrating the predominance of Gram-positive bacteria contamination. Other factors not related to the resistance phenotype may also be involved in the persistence of bacterial isolates in the skin allografts after antibiotic treatment. Gentamicin, amikacin, and tetracycline can be considered as an option for a more effective treatment cocktail. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-22T04:07:08Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/187344 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1471-2091 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001082504 |
identifier_str_mv |
1471-2091 001082504 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/187344 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
BMC Microbiology. London. Vol. 18, no. 121 (Sep. 2018), p. 1-9 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/187344/2/001082504.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/187344/1/001082504.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
7e3f92cecb75e690bdf7102fc766d488 deae5d8810c2e4335f2fdb3540f95d4d |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447677295394816 |