Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Meneghetti, Karine Lena
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Canabarro, Micaela do Canto, Otton, Letícia Muner, Hain, Thaís dos Santos, Geimba, Mercedes Passos, Corção, Gertrudes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/187344
Resumo: Bacterial contamination remains the major problem in skin banks, even after antimicrobial treatment, and results in high rates of tissue discarding. This study aimed to analyze bacterial contamination in 32 human skin allografts from the skin bank of Dr. Roberto Corrêa Chem from the Hospital Complex Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre. These samples were already discarded due to microbial contamination. The identification of the bacteria isolated from skin allografts was performed by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight. The antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates to six different classes of antimicrobials was determined using the diskdiffusion agar method, and the evaluation of the inhibitory potential was determined by the minimal inhibitory concentration (50/90) of antimicrobials already used in the skin bank and those that most isolates were susceptible to. A total of 21 (65.6%) skin samples were contaminated with Gram-positive bacteria: 1 (4.7%) with Paenibacillus sp., 12 (61.9%) with Bacillus sp., 6 (28.5%) with Staphylococcus sp., and 2 (9.5%) with Bacillus sp. and Staphylococcus sp. Several resistance profiles, including multiresistance, were found among the isolates. Most of the isolates were susceptible to at least one of the antimicrobials used in the skin bank. All isolates were susceptible to amikacin, gentamicin, and tetracycline, which demonstrated the best inhibitory activities against the isolates and were considered as potential candidates for new antimicrobial treatments. Bacillus, Paenibacillus, and Staphylococcus were isolated from the skin allografts, thus demonstrating the predominance of Gram-positive bacteria contamination. Other factors not related to the resistance phenotype may also be involved in the persistence of bacterial isolates in the skin allografts after antibiotic treatment. Gentamicin, amikacin, and tetracycline can be considered as an option for a more effective treatment cocktail.
id UFRGS-2_d3d2cad3af70c52b709197c567b91ffa
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/187344
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Meneghetti, Karine LenaCanabarro, Micaela do CantoOtton, Letícia MunerHain, Thaís dos SantosGeimba, Mercedes PassosCorção, Gertrudes2018-12-22T04:07:08Z20181471-2091http://hdl.handle.net/10183/187344001082504Bacterial contamination remains the major problem in skin banks, even after antimicrobial treatment, and results in high rates of tissue discarding. This study aimed to analyze bacterial contamination in 32 human skin allografts from the skin bank of Dr. Roberto Corrêa Chem from the Hospital Complex Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre. These samples were already discarded due to microbial contamination. The identification of the bacteria isolated from skin allografts was performed by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight. The antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates to six different classes of antimicrobials was determined using the diskdiffusion agar method, and the evaluation of the inhibitory potential was determined by the minimal inhibitory concentration (50/90) of antimicrobials already used in the skin bank and those that most isolates were susceptible to. A total of 21 (65.6%) skin samples were contaminated with Gram-positive bacteria: 1 (4.7%) with Paenibacillus sp., 12 (61.9%) with Bacillus sp., 6 (28.5%) with Staphylococcus sp., and 2 (9.5%) with Bacillus sp. and Staphylococcus sp. Several resistance profiles, including multiresistance, were found among the isolates. Most of the isolates were susceptible to at least one of the antimicrobials used in the skin bank. All isolates were susceptible to amikacin, gentamicin, and tetracycline, which demonstrated the best inhibitory activities against the isolates and were considered as potential candidates for new antimicrobial treatments. Bacillus, Paenibacillus, and Staphylococcus were isolated from the skin allografts, thus demonstrating the predominance of Gram-positive bacteria contamination. Other factors not related to the resistance phenotype may also be involved in the persistence of bacterial isolates in the skin allografts after antibiotic treatment. Gentamicin, amikacin, and tetracycline can be considered as an option for a more effective treatment cocktail.application/pdfengBMC Microbiology. London. Vol. 18, no. 121 (Sep. 2018), p. 1-9Curativos biológicosAloenxertosResistência microbiana a medicamentosBancos de tecidosSkin allograftBacterial contaminationAntimicrobial resistanceSkin bankDiscardsBacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problemEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001082504.pdf.txt001082504.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain48793http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/187344/2/001082504.pdf.txt7e3f92cecb75e690bdf7102fc766d488MD52ORIGINAL001082504.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf635357http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/187344/1/001082504.pdfdeae5d8810c2e4335f2fdb3540f95d4dMD5110183/1873442019-03-02 02:31:53.455347oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/187344Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2019-03-02T05:31:53Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem
title Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem
spellingShingle Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem
Meneghetti, Karine Lena
Curativos biológicos
Aloenxertos
Resistência microbiana a medicamentos
Bancos de tecidos
Skin allograft
Bacterial contamination
Antimicrobial resistance
Skin bank
Discards
title_short Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem
title_full Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem
title_fullStr Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem
title_full_unstemmed Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem
title_sort Bacterial contamination of human skin allografts and antimicrobial resistance : a skin bank problem
author Meneghetti, Karine Lena
author_facet Meneghetti, Karine Lena
Canabarro, Micaela do Canto
Otton, Letícia Muner
Hain, Thaís dos Santos
Geimba, Mercedes Passos
Corção, Gertrudes
author_role author
author2 Canabarro, Micaela do Canto
Otton, Letícia Muner
Hain, Thaís dos Santos
Geimba, Mercedes Passos
Corção, Gertrudes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Meneghetti, Karine Lena
Canabarro, Micaela do Canto
Otton, Letícia Muner
Hain, Thaís dos Santos
Geimba, Mercedes Passos
Corção, Gertrudes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Curativos biológicos
Aloenxertos
Resistência microbiana a medicamentos
Bancos de tecidos
topic Curativos biológicos
Aloenxertos
Resistência microbiana a medicamentos
Bancos de tecidos
Skin allograft
Bacterial contamination
Antimicrobial resistance
Skin bank
Discards
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Skin allograft
Bacterial contamination
Antimicrobial resistance
Skin bank
Discards
description Bacterial contamination remains the major problem in skin banks, even after antimicrobial treatment, and results in high rates of tissue discarding. This study aimed to analyze bacterial contamination in 32 human skin allografts from the skin bank of Dr. Roberto Corrêa Chem from the Hospital Complex Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre. These samples were already discarded due to microbial contamination. The identification of the bacteria isolated from skin allografts was performed by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight. The antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates to six different classes of antimicrobials was determined using the diskdiffusion agar method, and the evaluation of the inhibitory potential was determined by the minimal inhibitory concentration (50/90) of antimicrobials already used in the skin bank and those that most isolates were susceptible to. A total of 21 (65.6%) skin samples were contaminated with Gram-positive bacteria: 1 (4.7%) with Paenibacillus sp., 12 (61.9%) with Bacillus sp., 6 (28.5%) with Staphylococcus sp., and 2 (9.5%) with Bacillus sp. and Staphylococcus sp. Several resistance profiles, including multiresistance, were found among the isolates. Most of the isolates were susceptible to at least one of the antimicrobials used in the skin bank. All isolates were susceptible to amikacin, gentamicin, and tetracycline, which demonstrated the best inhibitory activities against the isolates and were considered as potential candidates for new antimicrobial treatments. Bacillus, Paenibacillus, and Staphylococcus were isolated from the skin allografts, thus demonstrating the predominance of Gram-positive bacteria contamination. Other factors not related to the resistance phenotype may also be involved in the persistence of bacterial isolates in the skin allografts after antibiotic treatment. Gentamicin, amikacin, and tetracycline can be considered as an option for a more effective treatment cocktail.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2018-12-22T04:07:08Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2018
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/187344
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1471-2091
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001082504
identifier_str_mv 1471-2091
001082504
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/187344
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv BMC Microbiology. London. Vol. 18, no. 121 (Sep. 2018), p. 1-9
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/187344/2/001082504.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/187344/1/001082504.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 7e3f92cecb75e690bdf7102fc766d488
deae5d8810c2e4335f2fdb3540f95d4d
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1815447677295394816