Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of resin-dentin bond strengths : in vitro effects of surface treatment with metalloproteinase inhibitors

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Totti, Marcelo
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Silva, Marcelo Goulart Rodrigues da, Fagundes, Laerte Ohse, Feldens, Thaís Thomé, Conceição, Ewerton Nocchi, Coelho de Souza, Fábio Herrmann, Erhardt, Maria Carolina Guilherme
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/107002
Resumo: AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of MMPs inhibitors (chlorhexidine and EDTA) in bond strength and quality of the hybrid layer of adhesive restorations in normal dentin using two ethanol-based total-etch adhesive systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two extracted human molars were coronally sectioned and randomly divided into 8 groups (n=4), depending on the surface pre-treatment and adhesive system used. The total-etch adhesive systems Single Bond 2 (2-step) and Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (3-step) were used as follows: 1) according to manufacturer's instructions (etching with 37% phosphoric acid (H₃P0₄) for 15 s); 2) etching with H₃P0₄ for 15 s, followed by 2% chlorhexidine for 120 s; 3) etching with 0.1 M EDTA for 60 s; 4) etching with 0.1 M EDTA followed by 2% chlorhexidine for 120 s. Teeth were incrementally restored with composite resin (Filtek Z350XT). After water storage for 24 h, teeth were double-sectioned, yielding stick specimens of 1.0 mm² bonded area, and then subjected to microtensile bond strength (MTBS) test at 0.5 mm/min. Additional specimens were gold-sputtered to be analyzed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data (in Mega Pascal) were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn (p <0.05) tests. RESULTS: The etching protocol (37% H₃P0₄ or EDTA) interfered with hybrid layer formation, monomer penetration and the MTBS. Funnel shaped resin tags were observed when dentin was etched with 37% H₃P0₄. In these specimens, MTBS were also higher. EDTA conditioning produced thin hybrid layers and smaller MTBS, regardless the adhesive system used. Chlorhexidine application after conditioning resulted in no apparent differences between both evaluated techniques (37% H₃P0₄ or EDTA). CONCLUSION: The use of chlorhexidine as a MMP inhibitor does not alter immediate bond strength values and does not interfere with hybrid layer formation.
id UFRGS-2_da3e7c2edcc28c6ff8972f814f785688
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/107002
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Totti, MarceloSilva, Marcelo Goulart Rodrigues daFagundes, Laerte OhseFeldens, Thaís ThoméConceição, Ewerton NocchiCoelho de Souza, Fábio HerrmannErhardt, Maria Carolina Guilherme2014-11-15T02:16:00Z20142317-5907http://hdl.handle.net/10183/107002000931839AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of MMPs inhibitors (chlorhexidine and EDTA) in bond strength and quality of the hybrid layer of adhesive restorations in normal dentin using two ethanol-based total-etch adhesive systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two extracted human molars were coronally sectioned and randomly divided into 8 groups (n=4), depending on the surface pre-treatment and adhesive system used. The total-etch adhesive systems Single Bond 2 (2-step) and Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (3-step) were used as follows: 1) according to manufacturer's instructions (etching with 37% phosphoric acid (H₃P0₄) for 15 s); 2) etching with H₃P0₄ for 15 s, followed by 2% chlorhexidine for 120 s; 3) etching with 0.1 M EDTA for 60 s; 4) etching with 0.1 M EDTA followed by 2% chlorhexidine for 120 s. Teeth were incrementally restored with composite resin (Filtek Z350XT). After water storage for 24 h, teeth were double-sectioned, yielding stick specimens of 1.0 mm² bonded area, and then subjected to microtensile bond strength (MTBS) test at 0.5 mm/min. Additional specimens were gold-sputtered to be analyzed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data (in Mega Pascal) were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn (p <0.05) tests. RESULTS: The etching protocol (37% H₃P0₄ or EDTA) interfered with hybrid layer formation, monomer penetration and the MTBS. Funnel shaped resin tags were observed when dentin was etched with 37% H₃P0₄. In these specimens, MTBS were also higher. EDTA conditioning produced thin hybrid layers and smaller MTBS, regardless the adhesive system used. Chlorhexidine application after conditioning resulted in no apparent differences between both evaluated techniques (37% H₃P0₄ or EDTA). CONCLUSION: The use of chlorhexidine as a MMP inhibitor does not alter immediate bond strength values and does not interfere with hybrid layer formation.application/pdfengJournal of Research in Dentistry. Tubarão, SC. Vol. 2, no. 3 (May/June 2014), p. 251-260Materiais odontológicosCimentos dentáriosClorexidinaDentin-Bonding agentsMetalloproteinasesChlorexidineEDTAQuantitative and qualitative evaluation of resin-dentin bond strengths : in vitro effects of surface treatment with metalloproteinase inhibitorsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT000931839.pdf.txt000931839.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain26256http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/107002/2/000931839.pdf.txt295815326ff748a733b883ea5d5c3bacMD52ORIGINAL000931839.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1637257http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/107002/1/000931839.pdfbb5347e2b76832b03d14ecc258fafd40MD5110183/1070022022-03-26 05:11:29.730152oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/107002Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2022-03-26T08:11:29Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of resin-dentin bond strengths : in vitro effects of surface treatment with metalloproteinase inhibitors
title Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of resin-dentin bond strengths : in vitro effects of surface treatment with metalloproteinase inhibitors
spellingShingle Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of resin-dentin bond strengths : in vitro effects of surface treatment with metalloproteinase inhibitors
Totti, Marcelo
Materiais odontológicos
Cimentos dentários
Clorexidina
Dentin-Bonding agents
Metalloproteinases
Chlorexidine
EDTA
title_short Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of resin-dentin bond strengths : in vitro effects of surface treatment with metalloproteinase inhibitors
title_full Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of resin-dentin bond strengths : in vitro effects of surface treatment with metalloproteinase inhibitors
title_fullStr Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of resin-dentin bond strengths : in vitro effects of surface treatment with metalloproteinase inhibitors
title_full_unstemmed Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of resin-dentin bond strengths : in vitro effects of surface treatment with metalloproteinase inhibitors
title_sort Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of resin-dentin bond strengths : in vitro effects of surface treatment with metalloproteinase inhibitors
author Totti, Marcelo
author_facet Totti, Marcelo
Silva, Marcelo Goulart Rodrigues da
Fagundes, Laerte Ohse
Feldens, Thaís Thomé
Conceição, Ewerton Nocchi
Coelho de Souza, Fábio Herrmann
Erhardt, Maria Carolina Guilherme
author_role author
author2 Silva, Marcelo Goulart Rodrigues da
Fagundes, Laerte Ohse
Feldens, Thaís Thomé
Conceição, Ewerton Nocchi
Coelho de Souza, Fábio Herrmann
Erhardt, Maria Carolina Guilherme
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Totti, Marcelo
Silva, Marcelo Goulart Rodrigues da
Fagundes, Laerte Ohse
Feldens, Thaís Thomé
Conceição, Ewerton Nocchi
Coelho de Souza, Fábio Herrmann
Erhardt, Maria Carolina Guilherme
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Materiais odontológicos
Cimentos dentários
Clorexidina
topic Materiais odontológicos
Cimentos dentários
Clorexidina
Dentin-Bonding agents
Metalloproteinases
Chlorexidine
EDTA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Dentin-Bonding agents
Metalloproteinases
Chlorexidine
EDTA
description AIM: The objective of this study was to evaluate the use of MMPs inhibitors (chlorhexidine and EDTA) in bond strength and quality of the hybrid layer of adhesive restorations in normal dentin using two ethanol-based total-etch adhesive systems. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-two extracted human molars were coronally sectioned and randomly divided into 8 groups (n=4), depending on the surface pre-treatment and adhesive system used. The total-etch adhesive systems Single Bond 2 (2-step) and Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus (3-step) were used as follows: 1) according to manufacturer's instructions (etching with 37% phosphoric acid (H₃P0₄) for 15 s); 2) etching with H₃P0₄ for 15 s, followed by 2% chlorhexidine for 120 s; 3) etching with 0.1 M EDTA for 60 s; 4) etching with 0.1 M EDTA followed by 2% chlorhexidine for 120 s. Teeth were incrementally restored with composite resin (Filtek Z350XT). After water storage for 24 h, teeth were double-sectioned, yielding stick specimens of 1.0 mm² bonded area, and then subjected to microtensile bond strength (MTBS) test at 0.5 mm/min. Additional specimens were gold-sputtered to be analyzed under scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data (in Mega Pascal) were subjected to Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn (p <0.05) tests. RESULTS: The etching protocol (37% H₃P0₄ or EDTA) interfered with hybrid layer formation, monomer penetration and the MTBS. Funnel shaped resin tags were observed when dentin was etched with 37% H₃P0₄. In these specimens, MTBS were also higher. EDTA conditioning produced thin hybrid layers and smaller MTBS, regardless the adhesive system used. Chlorhexidine application after conditioning resulted in no apparent differences between both evaluated techniques (37% H₃P0₄ or EDTA). CONCLUSION: The use of chlorhexidine as a MMP inhibitor does not alter immediate bond strength values and does not interfere with hybrid layer formation.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2014-11-15T02:16:00Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2014
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/107002
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2317-5907
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000931839
identifier_str_mv 2317-5907
000931839
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/107002
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Journal of Research in Dentistry. Tubarão, SC. Vol. 2, no. 3 (May/June 2014), p. 251-260
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/107002/2/000931839.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/107002/1/000931839.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 295815326ff748a733b883ea5d5c3bac
bb5347e2b76832b03d14ecc258fafd40
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224856091492352