The influence on fracture resistance of different composite resins and prefabricated posts to restore endodontically treated teeth
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/274763 |
Resumo: | Recent formulations of resin-based composites have incorporated different combinations of materials. However, the mechanical and bonding behavior of these materials with intraradicular posts are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of light-cure and dual-cure resin composite posts on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth. Materials and Methods: Ninety extracted human upper canines were selected and randomly divided into nine groups (n=10): (G1) endodontically treated teeth without endodontic posts; (G2) glass-fiber post cemented with glass-ionomer cement; (G3) endodontic post by dual-cure composite resin (Rebilda DC); (G4) endodontic post by dual-cure composite resin (Cosmecore); (G5) endodontic post by dual-cure composite resin (Bis-Core); (G6) endodontic post by light-cure composite resin; (G7) glass-fiber post customized with flowable composite resin; (G8) glass-fiber post cemented with light-cure composite resin; (G9) glass-fiber post cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. After the post insertion, all specimens were subjected to mechanical (250,000 cycles) and thermocycling (6000 cycles, 5 °C/55 °C) and immediate loading at 45 degrees in a universal testing machine until fracture. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons using the Fisher LSD Method (p < 0 05). Results: The mean failure loads (±SD) for the groups ranged from 100.7 ± 22.6 N to 221.9 ± 48.9 N. The G1 group (without endodontic posts) had a higher fracture strength than all experimental groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Within the limitations, the light- and dual-cure post technique did not present lower fracture resistance values as compared to the conventional glass-fiber post. |
id |
UFRGS-2_df009e02ed17f53114c2249f5daad9ca |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/274763 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Pamato, SauloKuga, Milton CarlosRicci, Weber AdadOliveira, Eliane Cristina Gulin deTrevisan, Tamara CarolinaSó, Marcus Vinicius ReisMoraes, João Carlos SilosPereira, Jefferson RicardoFahl Júnior, Newton2024-04-16T06:36:12Z20232073-4360http://hdl.handle.net/10183/274763001199902Recent formulations of resin-based composites have incorporated different combinations of materials. However, the mechanical and bonding behavior of these materials with intraradicular posts are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of light-cure and dual-cure resin composite posts on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth. Materials and Methods: Ninety extracted human upper canines were selected and randomly divided into nine groups (n=10): (G1) endodontically treated teeth without endodontic posts; (G2) glass-fiber post cemented with glass-ionomer cement; (G3) endodontic post by dual-cure composite resin (Rebilda DC); (G4) endodontic post by dual-cure composite resin (Cosmecore); (G5) endodontic post by dual-cure composite resin (Bis-Core); (G6) endodontic post by light-cure composite resin; (G7) glass-fiber post customized with flowable composite resin; (G8) glass-fiber post cemented with light-cure composite resin; (G9) glass-fiber post cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. After the post insertion, all specimens were subjected to mechanical (250,000 cycles) and thermocycling (6000 cycles, 5 °C/55 °C) and immediate loading at 45 degrees in a universal testing machine until fracture. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons using the Fisher LSD Method (p < 0 05). Results: The mean failure loads (±SD) for the groups ranged from 100.7 ± 22.6 N to 221.9 ± 48.9 N. The G1 group (without endodontic posts) had a higher fracture strength than all experimental groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Within the limitations, the light- and dual-cure post technique did not present lower fracture resistance values as compared to the conventional glass-fiber post.application/pdfengPolymers [recurso eletrônico]. Basel. Vol. 15, n.1 (Jan. 2023), 236, 10 p.Dente não vitalResistência à flexãoResinas compostasEndodontically treated teethFiber postFracture resistancePost-endodontic restorationResin materialThe influence on fracture resistance of different composite resins and prefabricated posts to restore endodontically treated teethEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001199902.pdf.txt001199902.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain38272http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/274763/2/001199902.pdf.txt31022ad3a140405395b380dfdddfe520MD52ORIGINAL001199902.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1738248http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/274763/1/001199902.pdfe5f9cd6f638deb8e10454c6d5b25cd18MD5110183/2747632024-04-17 06:35:38.837659oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/274763Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2024-04-17T09:35:38Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
The influence on fracture resistance of different composite resins and prefabricated posts to restore endodontically treated teeth |
title |
The influence on fracture resistance of different composite resins and prefabricated posts to restore endodontically treated teeth |
spellingShingle |
The influence on fracture resistance of different composite resins and prefabricated posts to restore endodontically treated teeth Pamato, Saulo Dente não vital Resistência à flexão Resinas compostas Endodontically treated teeth Fiber post Fracture resistance Post-endodontic restoration Resin material |
title_short |
The influence on fracture resistance of different composite resins and prefabricated posts to restore endodontically treated teeth |
title_full |
The influence on fracture resistance of different composite resins and prefabricated posts to restore endodontically treated teeth |
title_fullStr |
The influence on fracture resistance of different composite resins and prefabricated posts to restore endodontically treated teeth |
title_full_unstemmed |
The influence on fracture resistance of different composite resins and prefabricated posts to restore endodontically treated teeth |
title_sort |
The influence on fracture resistance of different composite resins and prefabricated posts to restore endodontically treated teeth |
author |
Pamato, Saulo |
author_facet |
Pamato, Saulo Kuga, Milton Carlos Ricci, Weber Adad Oliveira, Eliane Cristina Gulin de Trevisan, Tamara Carolina Só, Marcus Vinicius Reis Moraes, João Carlos Silos Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo Fahl Júnior, Newton |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Kuga, Milton Carlos Ricci, Weber Adad Oliveira, Eliane Cristina Gulin de Trevisan, Tamara Carolina Só, Marcus Vinicius Reis Moraes, João Carlos Silos Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo Fahl Júnior, Newton |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pamato, Saulo Kuga, Milton Carlos Ricci, Weber Adad Oliveira, Eliane Cristina Gulin de Trevisan, Tamara Carolina Só, Marcus Vinicius Reis Moraes, João Carlos Silos Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo Fahl Júnior, Newton |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dente não vital Resistência à flexão Resinas compostas |
topic |
Dente não vital Resistência à flexão Resinas compostas Endodontically treated teeth Fiber post Fracture resistance Post-endodontic restoration Resin material |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Endodontically treated teeth Fiber post Fracture resistance Post-endodontic restoration Resin material |
description |
Recent formulations of resin-based composites have incorporated different combinations of materials. However, the mechanical and bonding behavior of these materials with intraradicular posts are unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of light-cure and dual-cure resin composite posts on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth. Materials and Methods: Ninety extracted human upper canines were selected and randomly divided into nine groups (n=10): (G1) endodontically treated teeth without endodontic posts; (G2) glass-fiber post cemented with glass-ionomer cement; (G3) endodontic post by dual-cure composite resin (Rebilda DC); (G4) endodontic post by dual-cure composite resin (Cosmecore); (G5) endodontic post by dual-cure composite resin (Bis-Core); (G6) endodontic post by light-cure composite resin; (G7) glass-fiber post customized with flowable composite resin; (G8) glass-fiber post cemented with light-cure composite resin; (G9) glass-fiber post cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. After the post insertion, all specimens were subjected to mechanical (250,000 cycles) and thermocycling (6000 cycles, 5 °C/55 °C) and immediate loading at 45 degrees in a universal testing machine until fracture. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and multiple comparisons using the Fisher LSD Method (p < 0 05). Results: The mean failure loads (±SD) for the groups ranged from 100.7 ± 22.6 N to 221.9 ± 48.9 N. The G1 group (without endodontic posts) had a higher fracture strength than all experimental groups (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Within the limitations, the light- and dual-cure post technique did not present lower fracture resistance values as compared to the conventional glass-fiber post. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2023 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2024-04-16T06:36:12Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/274763 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
2073-4360 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001199902 |
identifier_str_mv |
2073-4360 001199902 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/274763 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Polymers [recurso eletrônico]. Basel. Vol. 15, n.1 (Jan. 2023), 236, 10 p. |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/274763/2/001199902.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/274763/1/001199902.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
31022ad3a140405395b380dfdddfe520 e5f9cd6f638deb8e10454c6d5b25cd18 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447858404392960 |