Evaluation of the potential improvement in the environmental footprint of geopolymers using waste-derived activators

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Passuello, Ana Carolina Badalotti
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Rodriguez Martinez, Erich David, Hirt, Eduardo, Longhi, Márlon Augusto, Bernal López, Susan Andrea, Provis, John L., Kirchheim, Ana Paula
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/222153
Resumo: Geopolymers produced from an aluminosilicate precursor and an alkaline activating solution have emerged as low carbon alternative binders which can substitute for Portland cement (PC) in many applications. The presence of soluble silicate in the activating solution of a geopolymer is known to yield a denser and more compact material with higher mechanical strength compared to hydroxide-activated geopolymers. However, these silicate solutions are the most expensive component of geopolymer cements, as well as the highest contributors to their environmental impacts in most life cycle categories. Geopolymers are widely accepted as a more environmental friendly material due to their claimed lower CO2 emissions due to their synthesis from industrial by-products or wastes, as well the low energy demand during their production. However, the use of alkali-silicate activators can significantly increase other environmental impacts, leading to controversies regarding whether geopolymers can really be considered as a more sustainable material. Thus, this study evaluates the life cycle impacts of a geopolymer produced from a kaolin sludge residue from the Brazilian mining industry. Alkaline solutions derived from sodium hydroxide solutions and two different soluble silica sources were used as activators: a commercial sodium silicate (waterglass), and chemically modified rice husk ash (RHA). The processes which contribute the most to the life cycle impacts of geopolymers are thermal curing, waterglass production, and sodium hydroxide production. The use of RHA-derived sodium silicate may reduce environmental impacts by more than 60% in 6 of the 9 categories assessed, indicating that this is a favourable alternative where RHA is locally available. Although the binders evaluated here have differences in mechanical properties, those using RHA-derived activators exhibit impacts lower than PC for 4 of the 8 categories evaluated, and a reduction of more than 70% in global warming potential. RHAbased activators are identified as a promising alternative for impact reduction in geopolymer production, and more detailed assessments of the performance and reactivity of these activators should be conducted.
id UFRGS-2_eb56771bdab693d99daede565edc53cf
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/222153
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Passuello, Ana Carolina BadalottiRodriguez Martinez, Erich DavidHirt, EduardoLonghi, Márlon AugustoBernal López, Susan AndreaProvis, John L.Kirchheim, Ana Paula2021-06-15T04:28:44Z20170959-6526http://hdl.handle.net/10183/222153001053535Geopolymers produced from an aluminosilicate precursor and an alkaline activating solution have emerged as low carbon alternative binders which can substitute for Portland cement (PC) in many applications. The presence of soluble silicate in the activating solution of a geopolymer is known to yield a denser and more compact material with higher mechanical strength compared to hydroxide-activated geopolymers. However, these silicate solutions are the most expensive component of geopolymer cements, as well as the highest contributors to their environmental impacts in most life cycle categories. Geopolymers are widely accepted as a more environmental friendly material due to their claimed lower CO2 emissions due to their synthesis from industrial by-products or wastes, as well the low energy demand during their production. However, the use of alkali-silicate activators can significantly increase other environmental impacts, leading to controversies regarding whether geopolymers can really be considered as a more sustainable material. Thus, this study evaluates the life cycle impacts of a geopolymer produced from a kaolin sludge residue from the Brazilian mining industry. Alkaline solutions derived from sodium hydroxide solutions and two different soluble silica sources were used as activators: a commercial sodium silicate (waterglass), and chemically modified rice husk ash (RHA). The processes which contribute the most to the life cycle impacts of geopolymers are thermal curing, waterglass production, and sodium hydroxide production. The use of RHA-derived sodium silicate may reduce environmental impacts by more than 60% in 6 of the 9 categories assessed, indicating that this is a favourable alternative where RHA is locally available. Although the binders evaluated here have differences in mechanical properties, those using RHA-derived activators exhibit impacts lower than PC for 4 of the 8 categories evaluated, and a reduction of more than 70% in global warming potential. RHAbased activators are identified as a promising alternative for impact reduction in geopolymer production, and more detailed assessments of the performance and reactivity of these activators should be conducted.application/pdfengJournal of cleaner production [recurso eletrônico]. [Amsterdam]. Vol. 166 (2017), p. 680-689GeopolímerosImpacto ambientalCimento portlandGeopolymersEnvironmental impactPortland cementEvaluation of the potential improvement in the environmental footprint of geopolymers using waste-derived activatorsEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001053535.pdf.txt001053535.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain59785http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/222153/2/001053535.pdf.txt857741b749663f08aa097d265d773d65MD52ORIGINAL001053535.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf1344342http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/222153/1/001053535.pdf9e85e91bd687dab8a0c7419bce2e9d93MD5110183/2221532021-06-29 04:21:01.843841oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/222153Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-06-29T07:21:01Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the potential improvement in the environmental footprint of geopolymers using waste-derived activators
title Evaluation of the potential improvement in the environmental footprint of geopolymers using waste-derived activators
spellingShingle Evaluation of the potential improvement in the environmental footprint of geopolymers using waste-derived activators
Passuello, Ana Carolina Badalotti
Geopolímeros
Impacto ambiental
Cimento portland
Geopolymers
Environmental impact
Portland cement
title_short Evaluation of the potential improvement in the environmental footprint of geopolymers using waste-derived activators
title_full Evaluation of the potential improvement in the environmental footprint of geopolymers using waste-derived activators
title_fullStr Evaluation of the potential improvement in the environmental footprint of geopolymers using waste-derived activators
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the potential improvement in the environmental footprint of geopolymers using waste-derived activators
title_sort Evaluation of the potential improvement in the environmental footprint of geopolymers using waste-derived activators
author Passuello, Ana Carolina Badalotti
author_facet Passuello, Ana Carolina Badalotti
Rodriguez Martinez, Erich David
Hirt, Eduardo
Longhi, Márlon Augusto
Bernal López, Susan Andrea
Provis, John L.
Kirchheim, Ana Paula
author_role author
author2 Rodriguez Martinez, Erich David
Hirt, Eduardo
Longhi, Márlon Augusto
Bernal López, Susan Andrea
Provis, John L.
Kirchheim, Ana Paula
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Passuello, Ana Carolina Badalotti
Rodriguez Martinez, Erich David
Hirt, Eduardo
Longhi, Márlon Augusto
Bernal López, Susan Andrea
Provis, John L.
Kirchheim, Ana Paula
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Geopolímeros
Impacto ambiental
Cimento portland
topic Geopolímeros
Impacto ambiental
Cimento portland
Geopolymers
Environmental impact
Portland cement
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Geopolymers
Environmental impact
Portland cement
description Geopolymers produced from an aluminosilicate precursor and an alkaline activating solution have emerged as low carbon alternative binders which can substitute for Portland cement (PC) in many applications. The presence of soluble silicate in the activating solution of a geopolymer is known to yield a denser and more compact material with higher mechanical strength compared to hydroxide-activated geopolymers. However, these silicate solutions are the most expensive component of geopolymer cements, as well as the highest contributors to their environmental impacts in most life cycle categories. Geopolymers are widely accepted as a more environmental friendly material due to their claimed lower CO2 emissions due to their synthesis from industrial by-products or wastes, as well the low energy demand during their production. However, the use of alkali-silicate activators can significantly increase other environmental impacts, leading to controversies regarding whether geopolymers can really be considered as a more sustainable material. Thus, this study evaluates the life cycle impacts of a geopolymer produced from a kaolin sludge residue from the Brazilian mining industry. Alkaline solutions derived from sodium hydroxide solutions and two different soluble silica sources were used as activators: a commercial sodium silicate (waterglass), and chemically modified rice husk ash (RHA). The processes which contribute the most to the life cycle impacts of geopolymers are thermal curing, waterglass production, and sodium hydroxide production. The use of RHA-derived sodium silicate may reduce environmental impacts by more than 60% in 6 of the 9 categories assessed, indicating that this is a favourable alternative where RHA is locally available. Although the binders evaluated here have differences in mechanical properties, those using RHA-derived activators exhibit impacts lower than PC for 4 of the 8 categories evaluated, and a reduction of more than 70% in global warming potential. RHAbased activators are identified as a promising alternative for impact reduction in geopolymer production, and more detailed assessments of the performance and reactivity of these activators should be conducted.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2017
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-06-15T04:28:44Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/222153
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 0959-6526
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001053535
identifier_str_mv 0959-6526
001053535
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/222153
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Journal of cleaner production [recurso eletrônico]. [Amsterdam]. Vol. 166 (2017), p. 680-689
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/222153/2/001053535.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/222153/1/001053535.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 857741b749663f08aa097d265d773d65
9e85e91bd687dab8a0c7419bce2e9d93
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801225020547006464