Epistemic and political confrontations around the public policies to fight COVID-19 pandemic

• Autor(a) principal: Moura, Cristiano Barbosa de
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: Nascimento, Matheus Monteiro, Lima, Nathan Willig
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: eng
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/236638
• topic: COVID-19 (Doença); Educacão em ciências; História da ciência; Filosofia da ciência; Controvérsia sociocientífica; COVID-19; Science education; History and philosophy of science; Science studies; Public controversies

Our purpose in this article is to discuss the roles for HPSS in Science Education considering the crisis of COVID-19, as well as to think what Science Education could look like beyond the pandemic. Considering the context of a pandemic as a starting point, we defend in this article the thesis that contours of public controversy involving COVID-19 bring elements that allow us to argue that Science Education needs to embrace perspectives that highlight politics as co-constitutive of science, and not in a subsidiary role to it. To defend this thesis, we begin with a theoretical framework based on arguments of science studies and from exemplary cases from history of science. Then, we analyze some of the public controversies surrounding COVID-19, in its most central aspects, trying to interpret how intertwining between science and politics took place. Brazilian case is analyzed in more details. Finally, based on educational scholarship and considering the previous discussions, we propose some implications for Science Education research and practices, both concerning the role of HPSS in its teaching and discussing critically boundaries of this research field.