Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/130261 |
Resumo: | AIM:' The' purpose' of' this' study' was' to' analyze' the' in' vitro' antimicrobial'activity'of'aqueous'and'alcoholic'extracts'of'propolis'at' 1%' and' 3%' concentrations' against' Enterococcus' faecalis' (ATCC®' 19433).' MATERIAL' AND' METHODS:' Initially,' the' microbial' suspension'was'seeded'in'a'Brain'Heart'Infusion'Agar'(BHIA)'culture' medium,' distributed' in' 20' Petri' dishes.' Then,' 4' soaked' filter' paper' discs' were' placed' on' the' surface' of' the' inoculated'medium'of' each' plate'for'1'minute'in'1'mL'of'the'following'substances:'C+'(positive' control,' n=20):' 2%' ' chlorhexidine' gel;' CE' (negative' control,' n=20):' saline' solution;' S1' (n=10):' 1%' bee' propolis' alcoholic' solution;' S2' (n=10):'3%'bee'propolis'alcoholic'solution;'E1'(n=10):'1%'aqueous' propolis'extract;'E2'(n=10):'3%'aqueous'propolis'extract.'One'filter' paper'disc'of'each'(C+,'CE,'S1'and'S2)'was'placed'in'a'set'of'10'Petri' dishes,'whereas'one'filter'paper'disc'of'each'(C+,'CE,'E1'and'E2)'was' placed' in' the' other' set' of' 10' Petri' dishes.' RESULTS:' The' results' obtained' after' incubation' at' 37°C' for' 24' hours' under' microaerobic' conditions'revealed'that'S2'showed'higher'mean'levels'of'microbial' growth' inhibition' as' compared' to' E1,' E2' and' S1.' There' were' no' significantly'statically'differences'between'the'groups,'except'for'the' S2' group' and'CE' group.'Mean' levels' in' all'other' groups'were' lower' than' in' the' C+' group.' CONCLUSION:' The' study' concluded' that' 1%' and' 3%' bee' propolis' alcoholic' solution' had' lower' antibacterial' activity' against' Enterococcus' faecalis' as' compared' to' 2%' chlorhexidine'gel. |
id |
UFRGS-2_f2fb5018cd64d2ee84e91cfe57c11da6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/130261 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Só, Marcus Vinicius ReisVolpato, CristianeSó, Bruna BarcelosBruggemann, RafaelaKopper, Patrícia Maria PoliPereira, Jefferson Ricardo2015-11-25T02:40:25Z20152317-5907http://hdl.handle.net/10183/130261000975909AIM:' The' purpose' of' this' study' was' to' analyze' the' in' vitro' antimicrobial'activity'of'aqueous'and'alcoholic'extracts'of'propolis'at' 1%' and' 3%' concentrations' against' Enterococcus' faecalis' (ATCC®' 19433).' MATERIAL' AND' METHODS:' Initially,' the' microbial' suspension'was'seeded'in'a'Brain'Heart'Infusion'Agar'(BHIA)'culture' medium,' distributed' in' 20' Petri' dishes.' Then,' 4' soaked' filter' paper' discs' were' placed' on' the' surface' of' the' inoculated'medium'of' each' plate'for'1'minute'in'1'mL'of'the'following'substances:'C+'(positive' control,' n=20):' 2%' ' chlorhexidine' gel;' CE' (negative' control,' n=20):' saline' solution;' S1' (n=10):' 1%' bee' propolis' alcoholic' solution;' S2' (n=10):'3%'bee'propolis'alcoholic'solution;'E1'(n=10):'1%'aqueous' propolis'extract;'E2'(n=10):'3%'aqueous'propolis'extract.'One'filter' paper'disc'of'each'(C+,'CE,'S1'and'S2)'was'placed'in'a'set'of'10'Petri' dishes,'whereas'one'filter'paper'disc'of'each'(C+,'CE,'E1'and'E2)'was' placed' in' the' other' set' of' 10' Petri' dishes.' RESULTS:' The' results' obtained' after' incubation' at' 37°C' for' 24' hours' under' microaerobic' conditions'revealed'that'S2'showed'higher'mean'levels'of'microbial' growth' inhibition' as' compared' to' E1,' E2' and' S1.' There' were' no' significantly'statically'differences'between'the'groups,'except'for'the' S2' group' and'CE' group.'Mean' levels' in' all'other' groups'were' lower' than' in' the' C+' group.' CONCLUSION:' The' study' concluded' that' 1%' and' 3%' bee' propolis' alcoholic' solution' had' lower' antibacterial' activity' against' Enterococcus' faecalis' as' compared' to' 2%' chlorhexidine'gel.application/pdfengJournal of Research in Dentistry. Tubarão, SC. Vol. 3, no. 1 (Jan./Feb. 2015), p. 576-582EndodontiaPrópoleAnti-infecciososEndodonticsChemical substancesBee propolisEvaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000975909.pdf000975909.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf405522http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/130261/1/000975909.pdff848ad34980d30eb2f299b7a33cf35adMD51TEXT000975909.pdf.txt000975909.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain19308http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/130261/2/000975909.pdf.txta61cb8ff1d6539190ab54e09708226a9MD52THUMBNAIL000975909.pdf.jpg000975909.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2025http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/130261/3/000975909.pdf.jpgeea8bfff0db7fdc4f27c4f6f0eb2ad40MD5310183/1302612018-10-25 09:30:55.721oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/130261Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.bropendoar:2018-10-25T12:30:55Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis |
title |
Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis Só, Marcus Vinicius Reis Endodontia Própole Anti-infecciosos Endodontics Chemical substances Bee propolis |
title_short |
Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis |
title_full |
Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis |
author |
Só, Marcus Vinicius Reis |
author_facet |
Só, Marcus Vinicius Reis Volpato, Cristiane Só, Bruna Barcelos Bruggemann, Rafaela Kopper, Patrícia Maria Poli Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Volpato, Cristiane Só, Bruna Barcelos Bruggemann, Rafaela Kopper, Patrícia Maria Poli Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Só, Marcus Vinicius Reis Volpato, Cristiane Só, Bruna Barcelos Bruggemann, Rafaela Kopper, Patrícia Maria Poli Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Endodontia Própole Anti-infecciosos |
topic |
Endodontia Própole Anti-infecciosos Endodontics Chemical substances Bee propolis |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Endodontics Chemical substances Bee propolis |
description |
AIM:' The' purpose' of' this' study' was' to' analyze' the' in' vitro' antimicrobial'activity'of'aqueous'and'alcoholic'extracts'of'propolis'at' 1%' and' 3%' concentrations' against' Enterococcus' faecalis' (ATCC®' 19433).' MATERIAL' AND' METHODS:' Initially,' the' microbial' suspension'was'seeded'in'a'Brain'Heart'Infusion'Agar'(BHIA)'culture' medium,' distributed' in' 20' Petri' dishes.' Then,' 4' soaked' filter' paper' discs' were' placed' on' the' surface' of' the' inoculated'medium'of' each' plate'for'1'minute'in'1'mL'of'the'following'substances:'C+'(positive' control,' n=20):' 2%' ' chlorhexidine' gel;' CE' (negative' control,' n=20):' saline' solution;' S1' (n=10):' 1%' bee' propolis' alcoholic' solution;' S2' (n=10):'3%'bee'propolis'alcoholic'solution;'E1'(n=10):'1%'aqueous' propolis'extract;'E2'(n=10):'3%'aqueous'propolis'extract.'One'filter' paper'disc'of'each'(C+,'CE,'S1'and'S2)'was'placed'in'a'set'of'10'Petri' dishes,'whereas'one'filter'paper'disc'of'each'(C+,'CE,'E1'and'E2)'was' placed' in' the' other' set' of' 10' Petri' dishes.' RESULTS:' The' results' obtained' after' incubation' at' 37°C' for' 24' hours' under' microaerobic' conditions'revealed'that'S2'showed'higher'mean'levels'of'microbial' growth' inhibition' as' compared' to' E1,' E2' and' S1.' There' were' no' significantly'statically'differences'between'the'groups,'except'for'the' S2' group' and'CE' group.'Mean' levels' in' all'other' groups'were' lower' than' in' the' C+' group.' CONCLUSION:' The' study' concluded' that' 1%' and' 3%' bee' propolis' alcoholic' solution' had' lower' antibacterial' activity' against' Enterococcus' faecalis' as' compared' to' 2%' chlorhexidine'gel. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2015-11-25T02:40:25Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2015 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/130261 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
2317-5907 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
000975909 |
identifier_str_mv |
2317-5907 000975909 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/130261 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Research in Dentistry. Tubarão, SC. Vol. 3, no. 1 (Jan./Feb. 2015), p. 576-582 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/130261/1/000975909.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/130261/2/000975909.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/130261/3/000975909.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
f848ad34980d30eb2f299b7a33cf35ad a61cb8ff1d6539190ab54e09708226a9 eea8bfff0db7fdc4f27c4f6f0eb2ad40 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
lume@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1817724973520781312 |