Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Só, Marcus Vinicius Reis
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Volpato, Cristiane, Só, Bruna Barcelos, Bruggemann, Rafaela, Kopper, Patrícia Maria Poli, Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/130261
Resumo: AIM:' The' purpose' of' this' study' was' to' analyze' the' in' vitro' antimicrobial'activity'of'aqueous'and'alcoholic'extracts'of'propolis'at' 1%' and' 3%' concentrations' against' Enterococcus' faecalis' (ATCC®' 19433).' MATERIAL' AND' METHODS:' Initially,' the' microbial' suspension'was'seeded'in'a'Brain'Heart'Infusion'Agar'(BHIA)'culture' medium,' distributed' in' 20' Petri' dishes.' Then,' 4' soaked' filter' paper' discs' were' placed' on' the' surface' of' the' inoculated'medium'of' each' plate'for'1'minute'in'1'mL'of'the'following'substances:'C+'(positive' control,' n=20):' 2%' ' chlorhexidine' gel;' CE' (negative' control,' n=20):' saline' solution;' S1' (n=10):' 1%' bee' propolis' alcoholic' solution;' S2' (n=10):'3%'bee'propolis'alcoholic'solution;'E1'(n=10):'1%'aqueous' propolis'extract;'E2'(n=10):'3%'aqueous'propolis'extract.'One'filter' paper'disc'of'each'(C+,'CE,'S1'and'S2)'was'placed'in'a'set'of'10'Petri' dishes,'whereas'one'filter'paper'disc'of'each'(C+,'CE,'E1'and'E2)'was' placed' in' the' other' set' of' 10' Petri' dishes.' RESULTS:' The' results' obtained' after' incubation' at' 37°C' for' 24' hours' under' microaerobic' conditions'revealed'that'S2'showed'higher'mean'levels'of'microbial' growth' inhibition' as' compared' to' E1,' E2' and' S1.' There' were' no' significantly'statically'differences'between'the'groups,'except'for'the' S2' group' and'CE' group.'Mean' levels' in' all'other' groups'were' lower' than' in' the' C+' group.' CONCLUSION:' The' study' concluded' that' 1%' and' 3%' bee' propolis' alcoholic' solution' had' lower' antibacterial' activity' against' Enterococcus' faecalis' as' compared' to' 2%' chlorhexidine'gel.
id UFRGS-2_f2fb5018cd64d2ee84e91cfe57c11da6
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/130261
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Só, Marcus Vinicius ReisVolpato, CristianeSó, Bruna BarcelosBruggemann, RafaelaKopper, Patrícia Maria PoliPereira, Jefferson Ricardo2015-11-25T02:40:25Z20152317-5907http://hdl.handle.net/10183/130261000975909AIM:' The' purpose' of' this' study' was' to' analyze' the' in' vitro' antimicrobial'activity'of'aqueous'and'alcoholic'extracts'of'propolis'at' 1%' and' 3%' concentrations' against' Enterococcus' faecalis' (ATCC®' 19433).' MATERIAL' AND' METHODS:' Initially,' the' microbial' suspension'was'seeded'in'a'Brain'Heart'Infusion'Agar'(BHIA)'culture' medium,' distributed' in' 20' Petri' dishes.' Then,' 4' soaked' filter' paper' discs' were' placed' on' the' surface' of' the' inoculated'medium'of' each' plate'for'1'minute'in'1'mL'of'the'following'substances:'C+'(positive' control,' n=20):' 2%' ' chlorhexidine' gel;' CE' (negative' control,' n=20):' saline' solution;' S1' (n=10):' 1%' bee' propolis' alcoholic' solution;' S2' (n=10):'3%'bee'propolis'alcoholic'solution;'E1'(n=10):'1%'aqueous' propolis'extract;'E2'(n=10):'3%'aqueous'propolis'extract.'One'filter' paper'disc'of'each'(C+,'CE,'S1'and'S2)'was'placed'in'a'set'of'10'Petri' dishes,'whereas'one'filter'paper'disc'of'each'(C+,'CE,'E1'and'E2)'was' placed' in' the' other' set' of' 10' Petri' dishes.' RESULTS:' The' results' obtained' after' incubation' at' 37°C' for' 24' hours' under' microaerobic' conditions'revealed'that'S2'showed'higher'mean'levels'of'microbial' growth' inhibition' as' compared' to' E1,' E2' and' S1.' There' were' no' significantly'statically'differences'between'the'groups,'except'for'the' S2' group' and'CE' group.'Mean' levels' in' all'other' groups'were' lower' than' in' the' C+' group.' CONCLUSION:' The' study' concluded' that' 1%' and' 3%' bee' propolis' alcoholic' solution' had' lower' antibacterial' activity' against' Enterococcus' faecalis' as' compared' to' 2%' chlorhexidine'gel.application/pdfengJournal of Research in Dentistry. Tubarão, SC. Vol. 3, no. 1 (Jan./Feb. 2015), p. 576-582EndodontiaPrópoleAnti-infecciososEndodonticsChemical substancesBee propolisEvaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000975909.pdf000975909.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf405522http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/130261/1/000975909.pdff848ad34980d30eb2f299b7a33cf35adMD51TEXT000975909.pdf.txt000975909.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain19308http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/130261/2/000975909.pdf.txta61cb8ff1d6539190ab54e09708226a9MD52THUMBNAIL000975909.pdf.jpg000975909.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2025http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/130261/3/000975909.pdf.jpgeea8bfff0db7fdc4f27c4f6f0eb2ad40MD5310183/1302612018-10-25 09:30:55.721oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/130261Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2018-10-25T12:30:55Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis
title Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis
spellingShingle Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis
Só, Marcus Vinicius Reis
Endodontia
Própole
Anti-infecciosos
Endodontics
Chemical substances
Bee propolis
title_short Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis
title_full Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis
title_fullStr Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis
title_sort Evaluation of the in vitro antimicrobial activity of alcoholic solution and aqueous extract of bee propolis against enterococcus faecalis
author Só, Marcus Vinicius Reis
author_facet Só, Marcus Vinicius Reis
Volpato, Cristiane
Só, Bruna Barcelos
Bruggemann, Rafaela
Kopper, Patrícia Maria Poli
Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Volpato, Cristiane
Só, Bruna Barcelos
Bruggemann, Rafaela
Kopper, Patrícia Maria Poli
Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Só, Marcus Vinicius Reis
Volpato, Cristiane
Só, Bruna Barcelos
Bruggemann, Rafaela
Kopper, Patrícia Maria Poli
Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Endodontia
Própole
Anti-infecciosos
topic Endodontia
Própole
Anti-infecciosos
Endodontics
Chemical substances
Bee propolis
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Endodontics
Chemical substances
Bee propolis
description AIM:' The' purpose' of' this' study' was' to' analyze' the' in' vitro' antimicrobial'activity'of'aqueous'and'alcoholic'extracts'of'propolis'at' 1%' and' 3%' concentrations' against' Enterococcus' faecalis' (ATCC®' 19433).' MATERIAL' AND' METHODS:' Initially,' the' microbial' suspension'was'seeded'in'a'Brain'Heart'Infusion'Agar'(BHIA)'culture' medium,' distributed' in' 20' Petri' dishes.' Then,' 4' soaked' filter' paper' discs' were' placed' on' the' surface' of' the' inoculated'medium'of' each' plate'for'1'minute'in'1'mL'of'the'following'substances:'C+'(positive' control,' n=20):' 2%' ' chlorhexidine' gel;' CE' (negative' control,' n=20):' saline' solution;' S1' (n=10):' 1%' bee' propolis' alcoholic' solution;' S2' (n=10):'3%'bee'propolis'alcoholic'solution;'E1'(n=10):'1%'aqueous' propolis'extract;'E2'(n=10):'3%'aqueous'propolis'extract.'One'filter' paper'disc'of'each'(C+,'CE,'S1'and'S2)'was'placed'in'a'set'of'10'Petri' dishes,'whereas'one'filter'paper'disc'of'each'(C+,'CE,'E1'and'E2)'was' placed' in' the' other' set' of' 10' Petri' dishes.' RESULTS:' The' results' obtained' after' incubation' at' 37°C' for' 24' hours' under' microaerobic' conditions'revealed'that'S2'showed'higher'mean'levels'of'microbial' growth' inhibition' as' compared' to' E1,' E2' and' S1.' There' were' no' significantly'statically'differences'between'the'groups,'except'for'the' S2' group' and'CE' group.'Mean' levels' in' all'other' groups'were' lower' than' in' the' C+' group.' CONCLUSION:' The' study' concluded' that' 1%' and' 3%' bee' propolis' alcoholic' solution' had' lower' antibacterial' activity' against' Enterococcus' faecalis' as' compared' to' 2%' chlorhexidine'gel.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2015-11-25T02:40:25Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2015
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/130261
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2317-5907
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000975909
identifier_str_mv 2317-5907
000975909
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/130261
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Journal of Research in Dentistry. Tubarão, SC. Vol. 3, no. 1 (Jan./Feb. 2015), p. 576-582
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/130261/1/000975909.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/130261/2/000975909.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/130261/3/000975909.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv f848ad34980d30eb2f299b7a33cf35ad
a61cb8ff1d6539190ab54e09708226a9
eea8bfff0db7fdc4f27c4f6f0eb2ad40
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224891418017792