Comparative study between EDXRF and ASTM E572 methods using two-way ANOVA
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/250815 |
Resumo: | Comparison with reference method is one of the necessary requirements for the validation of non-standard methods. This comparison was made using the experiment planning technique with two-way ANOVA. In ANOVA, the results obtained using the EDXRF method, to be validated, were compared with the results obtained using the ASTM E572-13 standard test method. Fisher's tests (F -test) were used to comparative study between of the elements: molybdenum, niobium, copper, nickel, manganese, chromium and vanadium. All F -tests of the elements indicate that the null hypothesis (Ho) has not been rejected. As a result, there is no significant difference between the methods compared. Therefore, according to this study, it is concluded that the EDXRF method was approved in this method comparison requirement. |
id |
UFRGS-2_f92c44a414746763b008dcbd29b5172a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/250815 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Krummenauer, AlexVeit, Hugo MarceloFerreira, Jane Zoppas2022-11-09T04:44:41Z20181742-6588http://hdl.handle.net/10183/250815001086729Comparison with reference method is one of the necessary requirements for the validation of non-standard methods. This comparison was made using the experiment planning technique with two-way ANOVA. In ANOVA, the results obtained using the EDXRF method, to be validated, were compared with the results obtained using the ASTM E572-13 standard test method. Fisher's tests (F -test) were used to comparative study between of the elements: molybdenum, niobium, copper, nickel, manganese, chromium and vanadium. All F -tests of the elements indicate that the null hypothesis (Ho) has not been rejected. As a result, there is no significant difference between the methods compared. Therefore, according to this study, it is concluded that the EDXRF method was approved in this method comparison requirement.application/pdfengJournal of physics : conference series. Bristol. Vol. 975 (2018), 012004Estudo comparativoAnálise de variânciaFluorescência de raios XComparative study between EDXRF and ASTM E572 methods using two-way ANOVAEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001086729.pdf.txt001086729.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain19699http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/250815/2/001086729.pdf.txt70b0526b77263d9bdfe54b44ada44ebaMD52ORIGINAL001086729.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf573933http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/250815/1/001086729.pdf054351fe180561830a5832348c059787MD5110183/2508152024-05-23 06:42:37.901602oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/250815Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2024-05-23T09:42:37Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Comparative study between EDXRF and ASTM E572 methods using two-way ANOVA |
title |
Comparative study between EDXRF and ASTM E572 methods using two-way ANOVA |
spellingShingle |
Comparative study between EDXRF and ASTM E572 methods using two-way ANOVA Krummenauer, Alex Estudo comparativo Análise de variância Fluorescência de raios X |
title_short |
Comparative study between EDXRF and ASTM E572 methods using two-way ANOVA |
title_full |
Comparative study between EDXRF and ASTM E572 methods using two-way ANOVA |
title_fullStr |
Comparative study between EDXRF and ASTM E572 methods using two-way ANOVA |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study between EDXRF and ASTM E572 methods using two-way ANOVA |
title_sort |
Comparative study between EDXRF and ASTM E572 methods using two-way ANOVA |
author |
Krummenauer, Alex |
author_facet |
Krummenauer, Alex Veit, Hugo Marcelo Ferreira, Jane Zoppas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Veit, Hugo Marcelo Ferreira, Jane Zoppas |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Krummenauer, Alex Veit, Hugo Marcelo Ferreira, Jane Zoppas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Estudo comparativo Análise de variância Fluorescência de raios X |
topic |
Estudo comparativo Análise de variância Fluorescência de raios X |
description |
Comparison with reference method is one of the necessary requirements for the validation of non-standard methods. This comparison was made using the experiment planning technique with two-way ANOVA. In ANOVA, the results obtained using the EDXRF method, to be validated, were compared with the results obtained using the ASTM E572-13 standard test method. Fisher's tests (F -test) were used to comparative study between of the elements: molybdenum, niobium, copper, nickel, manganese, chromium and vanadium. All F -tests of the elements indicate that the null hypothesis (Ho) has not been rejected. As a result, there is no significant difference between the methods compared. Therefore, according to this study, it is concluded that the EDXRF method was approved in this method comparison requirement. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-09T04:44:41Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/250815 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1742-6588 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001086729 |
identifier_str_mv |
1742-6588 001086729 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/250815 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Journal of physics : conference series. Bristol. Vol. 975 (2018), 012004 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/250815/2/001086729.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/250815/1/001086729.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
70b0526b77263d9bdfe54b44ada44eba 054351fe180561830a5832348c059787 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1801225073786355712 |