Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Azevedo, Bruno de
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Davi Alves, Finger, Ingrid, Tomitch, Lêda Maria Braga
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/252258
Resumo: The ubiquity of multitasking has led researchers to investigate its potential costs for reading and learning (Clinton-Lisell, 2021). While some studies have not shown detrimental effects of multitasking for reading comprehension (Bowman et al., 2010; Cho et al., 2015; Pashler et al., 2013), one particular study has found a benefit of multitasking (Tran et al., 2013). These results, nevertheless, do not converge with the findings of recent meta-analyses, which have suggested both a negative effect of multitasking for reading comprehension (Clinton-Lisell, 2021), as well as the disruptive effects of listening to lyrical music while reading for comprehension (Vasilev et al., 2018). Previous research seems to converge with the theories of how working memory copes with the complexity of reading as a process, since several subprocesses must be orchestrated so that the ultimate goal of reading – the construction of a mental representation – is fully achieved (Tomitch, 2020). In addition to that, no previous study has investigated reading as a multilevel construct in which both literal and inferential comprehension (Alptekin & Erçetin, 2010; Kintsch, 1998) is assessed in a multitasking setting. With that in mind, we investigated whether working memory capacity, measured by the Self-Administrable Reading Span Test (Oliveira et al., 2021), predicts proficient bilinguals’ performance in literal and inferential comprehension, by means of comprehension questions (Pearson & Johnson, 1978) and reading times, under a multitasking setting in two conditions – listening to lyrical music (experimental) as opposed to listening to non-lyrical music (control). Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that working memory capacity significantly predicted inferential, but not literal comprehension nor reading times, and only when participants were listening to lyrical music. Results are discussed both in terms of the effects of multitasking on reading comprehension as well as the role of working memory in language comprehension.
id UFRGS-2_fb0467507f2f58676bb152995e8a4c60
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/252258
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Azevedo, Bruno deOliveira, Davi AlvesFinger, IngridTomitch, Lêda Maria Braga2022-12-02T04:54:51Z20222667-6753http://hdl.handle.net/10183/252258001152471The ubiquity of multitasking has led researchers to investigate its potential costs for reading and learning (Clinton-Lisell, 2021). While some studies have not shown detrimental effects of multitasking for reading comprehension (Bowman et al., 2010; Cho et al., 2015; Pashler et al., 2013), one particular study has found a benefit of multitasking (Tran et al., 2013). These results, nevertheless, do not converge with the findings of recent meta-analyses, which have suggested both a negative effect of multitasking for reading comprehension (Clinton-Lisell, 2021), as well as the disruptive effects of listening to lyrical music while reading for comprehension (Vasilev et al., 2018). Previous research seems to converge with the theories of how working memory copes with the complexity of reading as a process, since several subprocesses must be orchestrated so that the ultimate goal of reading – the construction of a mental representation – is fully achieved (Tomitch, 2020). In addition to that, no previous study has investigated reading as a multilevel construct in which both literal and inferential comprehension (Alptekin & Erçetin, 2010; Kintsch, 1998) is assessed in a multitasking setting. With that in mind, we investigated whether working memory capacity, measured by the Self-Administrable Reading Span Test (Oliveira et al., 2021), predicts proficient bilinguals’ performance in literal and inferential comprehension, by means of comprehension questions (Pearson & Johnson, 1978) and reading times, under a multitasking setting in two conditions – listening to lyrical music (experimental) as opposed to listening to non-lyrical music (control). Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that working memory capacity significantly predicted inferential, but not literal comprehension nor reading times, and only when participants were listening to lyrical music. Results are discussed both in terms of the effects of multitasking on reading comprehension as well as the role of working memory in language comprehension.application/pdfengLanguage teaching research quarterly. Ankara, Turkey. Vol. 31 (2022), p. [136-158]MultitarefasCompreensão da leituraBilingüismoLíngua inglesaLíngua portuguesaWorking memoryMultitaskingLiteral comprehensionInferential comprehensionDigital readingDoes working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting?Estrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001152471.pdf.txt001152471.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain75816http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/252258/2/001152471.pdf.txte9af141eccc5607dbfdc3e17870a1a07MD52ORIGINAL001152471.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf440360http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/252258/1/001152471.pdf96be7c511bd80de53fb8b231f6bbf104MD5110183/2522582022-12-03 06:11:46.741709oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/252258Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2022-12-03T08:11:46Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting?
title Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting?
spellingShingle Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting?
Azevedo, Bruno de
Multitarefas
Compreensão da leitura
Bilingüismo
Língua inglesa
Língua portuguesa
Working memory
Multitasking
Literal comprehension
Inferential comprehension
Digital reading
title_short Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting?
title_full Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting?
title_fullStr Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting?
title_full_unstemmed Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting?
title_sort Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting?
author Azevedo, Bruno de
author_facet Azevedo, Bruno de
Oliveira, Davi Alves
Finger, Ingrid
Tomitch, Lêda Maria Braga
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Davi Alves
Finger, Ingrid
Tomitch, Lêda Maria Braga
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Azevedo, Bruno de
Oliveira, Davi Alves
Finger, Ingrid
Tomitch, Lêda Maria Braga
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Multitarefas
Compreensão da leitura
Bilingüismo
Língua inglesa
Língua portuguesa
topic Multitarefas
Compreensão da leitura
Bilingüismo
Língua inglesa
Língua portuguesa
Working memory
Multitasking
Literal comprehension
Inferential comprehension
Digital reading
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Working memory
Multitasking
Literal comprehension
Inferential comprehension
Digital reading
description The ubiquity of multitasking has led researchers to investigate its potential costs for reading and learning (Clinton-Lisell, 2021). While some studies have not shown detrimental effects of multitasking for reading comprehension (Bowman et al., 2010; Cho et al., 2015; Pashler et al., 2013), one particular study has found a benefit of multitasking (Tran et al., 2013). These results, nevertheless, do not converge with the findings of recent meta-analyses, which have suggested both a negative effect of multitasking for reading comprehension (Clinton-Lisell, 2021), as well as the disruptive effects of listening to lyrical music while reading for comprehension (Vasilev et al., 2018). Previous research seems to converge with the theories of how working memory copes with the complexity of reading as a process, since several subprocesses must be orchestrated so that the ultimate goal of reading – the construction of a mental representation – is fully achieved (Tomitch, 2020). In addition to that, no previous study has investigated reading as a multilevel construct in which both literal and inferential comprehension (Alptekin & Erçetin, 2010; Kintsch, 1998) is assessed in a multitasking setting. With that in mind, we investigated whether working memory capacity, measured by the Self-Administrable Reading Span Test (Oliveira et al., 2021), predicts proficient bilinguals’ performance in literal and inferential comprehension, by means of comprehension questions (Pearson & Johnson, 1978) and reading times, under a multitasking setting in two conditions – listening to lyrical music (experimental) as opposed to listening to non-lyrical music (control). Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that working memory capacity significantly predicted inferential, but not literal comprehension nor reading times, and only when participants were listening to lyrical music. Results are discussed both in terms of the effects of multitasking on reading comprehension as well as the role of working memory in language comprehension.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-12-02T04:54:51Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2022
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/252258
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 2667-6753
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001152471
identifier_str_mv 2667-6753
001152471
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/252258
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Language teaching research quarterly. Ankara, Turkey. Vol. 31 (2022), p. [136-158]
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/252258/2/001152471.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/252258/1/001152471.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv e9af141eccc5607dbfdc3e17870a1a07
96be7c511bd80de53fb8b231f6bbf104
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1815447813312479232