Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Texto Completo: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/252258 |
Resumo: | The ubiquity of multitasking has led researchers to investigate its potential costs for reading and learning (Clinton-Lisell, 2021). While some studies have not shown detrimental effects of multitasking for reading comprehension (Bowman et al., 2010; Cho et al., 2015; Pashler et al., 2013), one particular study has found a benefit of multitasking (Tran et al., 2013). These results, nevertheless, do not converge with the findings of recent meta-analyses, which have suggested both a negative effect of multitasking for reading comprehension (Clinton-Lisell, 2021), as well as the disruptive effects of listening to lyrical music while reading for comprehension (Vasilev et al., 2018). Previous research seems to converge with the theories of how working memory copes with the complexity of reading as a process, since several subprocesses must be orchestrated so that the ultimate goal of reading – the construction of a mental representation – is fully achieved (Tomitch, 2020). In addition to that, no previous study has investigated reading as a multilevel construct in which both literal and inferential comprehension (Alptekin & Erçetin, 2010; Kintsch, 1998) is assessed in a multitasking setting. With that in mind, we investigated whether working memory capacity, measured by the Self-Administrable Reading Span Test (Oliveira et al., 2021), predicts proficient bilinguals’ performance in literal and inferential comprehension, by means of comprehension questions (Pearson & Johnson, 1978) and reading times, under a multitasking setting in two conditions – listening to lyrical music (experimental) as opposed to listening to non-lyrical music (control). Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that working memory capacity significantly predicted inferential, but not literal comprehension nor reading times, and only when participants were listening to lyrical music. Results are discussed both in terms of the effects of multitasking on reading comprehension as well as the role of working memory in language comprehension. |
id |
UFRGS-2_fb0467507f2f58676bb152995e8a4c60 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/252258 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Azevedo, Bruno deOliveira, Davi AlvesFinger, IngridTomitch, Lêda Maria Braga2022-12-02T04:54:51Z20222667-6753http://hdl.handle.net/10183/252258001152471The ubiquity of multitasking has led researchers to investigate its potential costs for reading and learning (Clinton-Lisell, 2021). While some studies have not shown detrimental effects of multitasking for reading comprehension (Bowman et al., 2010; Cho et al., 2015; Pashler et al., 2013), one particular study has found a benefit of multitasking (Tran et al., 2013). These results, nevertheless, do not converge with the findings of recent meta-analyses, which have suggested both a negative effect of multitasking for reading comprehension (Clinton-Lisell, 2021), as well as the disruptive effects of listening to lyrical music while reading for comprehension (Vasilev et al., 2018). Previous research seems to converge with the theories of how working memory copes with the complexity of reading as a process, since several subprocesses must be orchestrated so that the ultimate goal of reading – the construction of a mental representation – is fully achieved (Tomitch, 2020). In addition to that, no previous study has investigated reading as a multilevel construct in which both literal and inferential comprehension (Alptekin & Erçetin, 2010; Kintsch, 1998) is assessed in a multitasking setting. With that in mind, we investigated whether working memory capacity, measured by the Self-Administrable Reading Span Test (Oliveira et al., 2021), predicts proficient bilinguals’ performance in literal and inferential comprehension, by means of comprehension questions (Pearson & Johnson, 1978) and reading times, under a multitasking setting in two conditions – listening to lyrical music (experimental) as opposed to listening to non-lyrical music (control). Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that working memory capacity significantly predicted inferential, but not literal comprehension nor reading times, and only when participants were listening to lyrical music. Results are discussed both in terms of the effects of multitasking on reading comprehension as well as the role of working memory in language comprehension.application/pdfengLanguage teaching research quarterly. Ankara, Turkey. Vol. 31 (2022), p. [136-158]MultitarefasCompreensão da leituraBilingüismoLíngua inglesaLíngua portuguesaWorking memoryMultitaskingLiteral comprehensionInferential comprehensionDigital readingDoes working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting?Estrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001152471.pdf.txt001152471.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain75816http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/252258/2/001152471.pdf.txte9af141eccc5607dbfdc3e17870a1a07MD52ORIGINAL001152471.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf440360http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/252258/1/001152471.pdf96be7c511bd80de53fb8b231f6bbf104MD5110183/2522582022-12-03 06:11:46.741709oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/252258Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2022-12-03T08:11:46Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting? |
title |
Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting? |
spellingShingle |
Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting? Azevedo, Bruno de Multitarefas Compreensão da leitura Bilingüismo Língua inglesa Língua portuguesa Working memory Multitasking Literal comprehension Inferential comprehension Digital reading |
title_short |
Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting? |
title_full |
Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting? |
title_fullStr |
Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting? |
title_sort |
Does working memory capacity predict literal and inferential comprehension of bilinguals' digital reading in a multitasking setting? |
author |
Azevedo, Bruno de |
author_facet |
Azevedo, Bruno de Oliveira, Davi Alves Finger, Ingrid Tomitch, Lêda Maria Braga |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Oliveira, Davi Alves Finger, Ingrid Tomitch, Lêda Maria Braga |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Azevedo, Bruno de Oliveira, Davi Alves Finger, Ingrid Tomitch, Lêda Maria Braga |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Multitarefas Compreensão da leitura Bilingüismo Língua inglesa Língua portuguesa |
topic |
Multitarefas Compreensão da leitura Bilingüismo Língua inglesa Língua portuguesa Working memory Multitasking Literal comprehension Inferential comprehension Digital reading |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Working memory Multitasking Literal comprehension Inferential comprehension Digital reading |
description |
The ubiquity of multitasking has led researchers to investigate its potential costs for reading and learning (Clinton-Lisell, 2021). While some studies have not shown detrimental effects of multitasking for reading comprehension (Bowman et al., 2010; Cho et al., 2015; Pashler et al., 2013), one particular study has found a benefit of multitasking (Tran et al., 2013). These results, nevertheless, do not converge with the findings of recent meta-analyses, which have suggested both a negative effect of multitasking for reading comprehension (Clinton-Lisell, 2021), as well as the disruptive effects of listening to lyrical music while reading for comprehension (Vasilev et al., 2018). Previous research seems to converge with the theories of how working memory copes with the complexity of reading as a process, since several subprocesses must be orchestrated so that the ultimate goal of reading – the construction of a mental representation – is fully achieved (Tomitch, 2020). In addition to that, no previous study has investigated reading as a multilevel construct in which both literal and inferential comprehension (Alptekin & Erçetin, 2010; Kintsch, 1998) is assessed in a multitasking setting. With that in mind, we investigated whether working memory capacity, measured by the Self-Administrable Reading Span Test (Oliveira et al., 2021), predicts proficient bilinguals’ performance in literal and inferential comprehension, by means of comprehension questions (Pearson & Johnson, 1978) and reading times, under a multitasking setting in two conditions – listening to lyrical music (experimental) as opposed to listening to non-lyrical music (control). Multiple linear regression analyses revealed that working memory capacity significantly predicted inferential, but not literal comprehension nor reading times, and only when participants were listening to lyrical music. Results are discussed both in terms of the effects of multitasking on reading comprehension as well as the role of working memory in language comprehension. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2022-12-02T04:54:51Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2022 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/252258 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
2667-6753 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
001152471 |
identifier_str_mv |
2667-6753 001152471 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/252258 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Language teaching research quarterly. Ankara, Turkey. Vol. 31 (2022), p. [136-158] |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/252258/2/001152471.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/252258/1/001152471.pdf |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
e9af141eccc5607dbfdc3e17870a1a07 96be7c511bd80de53fb8b231f6bbf104 |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1815447813312479232 |