Accuracy investigation in the modeling of partially shaded photovoltaic systems

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Chepp, Ellen David
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Gasparin, Fabiano Perin, Krenzinger, Arno
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/222236
Resumo: Software for simulation of photovoltaic (PV) systems is widely used for dimensioning and forecasting electrical production. A factor of losses in PV installations is the partial shading caused by surrounding elements, and these software allow the user to estimate this effect. However, the accuracy of these simulated results for shaded PV systems is not widely studied. The purpose of this article is to investigate the accuracy and quantify the differences between simulated and measured data of partially shaded PV systems, obtained with the widely used tools SAM and PVSyst. Measured data from a PV installation were compared to results from simulations performed using the different shading calculation options available in both tools. The simulated outputs were both underestimated and overestimated in the shading situations. This variation was related to the use of an hourly fraction of shading and, in the case of SAM, due to the limitations of the 3D tools available for representation. Another source of differences between simulated and measured values was the use of uniform shading factors for diffuse and albedo. In addition, the simplification of the 3D model had a significant impact on the predicted energy, mainly on cloudy days. Both software overestimated the electricity production for the entire measurement period, reaching differences between the predicted and the measured energy varying from 9% to 24%. Shaded PV systems must be carefully analyzed, and the simulated results may differ from the measured values, which may even influence the decision on the feasibility of an installation.
id UFRGS-2_fb7b9a7d3ed4b343685e005108099e1f
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/222236
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Chepp, Ellen DavidGasparin, Fabiano PerinKrenzinger, Arno2021-06-16T04:36:23Z20210038-092Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/10183/222236001126647Software for simulation of photovoltaic (PV) systems is widely used for dimensioning and forecasting electrical production. A factor of losses in PV installations is the partial shading caused by surrounding elements, and these software allow the user to estimate this effect. However, the accuracy of these simulated results for shaded PV systems is not widely studied. The purpose of this article is to investigate the accuracy and quantify the differences between simulated and measured data of partially shaded PV systems, obtained with the widely used tools SAM and PVSyst. Measured data from a PV installation were compared to results from simulations performed using the different shading calculation options available in both tools. The simulated outputs were both underestimated and overestimated in the shading situations. This variation was related to the use of an hourly fraction of shading and, in the case of SAM, due to the limitations of the 3D tools available for representation. Another source of differences between simulated and measured values was the use of uniform shading factors for diffuse and albedo. In addition, the simplification of the 3D model had a significant impact on the predicted energy, mainly on cloudy days. Both software overestimated the electricity production for the entire measurement period, reaching differences between the predicted and the measured energy varying from 9% to 24%. Shaded PV systems must be carefully analyzed, and the simulated results may differ from the measured values, which may even influence the decision on the feasibility of an installation.application/pdfengSolar energy :international journal for scientists, engineers and technologists in solar energy and its application. New York, N. Y. Vol. 223 (July 2021), p. 182-192Sistemas fotovoltaicosEnergia solar fotovoltaicaSimulação computacionalPhotovoltaicShadingSimulationAccuracyAccuracy investigation in the modeling of partially shaded photovoltaic systemsEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSTEXT001126647.pdf.txt001126647.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain51148http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/222236/2/001126647.pdf.txtcc5d7153f6e10f1ab29ee5577138d379MD52ORIGINAL001126647.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf9525426http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/222236/1/001126647.pdf80745bdcac80f8cfa55556b97f49f4ffMD5110183/2222362021-06-26 04:40:24.55192oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/222236Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2021-06-26T07:40:24Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Accuracy investigation in the modeling of partially shaded photovoltaic systems
title Accuracy investigation in the modeling of partially shaded photovoltaic systems
spellingShingle Accuracy investigation in the modeling of partially shaded photovoltaic systems
Chepp, Ellen David
Sistemas fotovoltaicos
Energia solar fotovoltaica
Simulação computacional
Photovoltaic
Shading
Simulation
Accuracy
title_short Accuracy investigation in the modeling of partially shaded photovoltaic systems
title_full Accuracy investigation in the modeling of partially shaded photovoltaic systems
title_fullStr Accuracy investigation in the modeling of partially shaded photovoltaic systems
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy investigation in the modeling of partially shaded photovoltaic systems
title_sort Accuracy investigation in the modeling of partially shaded photovoltaic systems
author Chepp, Ellen David
author_facet Chepp, Ellen David
Gasparin, Fabiano Perin
Krenzinger, Arno
author_role author
author2 Gasparin, Fabiano Perin
Krenzinger, Arno
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Chepp, Ellen David
Gasparin, Fabiano Perin
Krenzinger, Arno
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sistemas fotovoltaicos
Energia solar fotovoltaica
Simulação computacional
topic Sistemas fotovoltaicos
Energia solar fotovoltaica
Simulação computacional
Photovoltaic
Shading
Simulation
Accuracy
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Photovoltaic
Shading
Simulation
Accuracy
description Software for simulation of photovoltaic (PV) systems is widely used for dimensioning and forecasting electrical production. A factor of losses in PV installations is the partial shading caused by surrounding elements, and these software allow the user to estimate this effect. However, the accuracy of these simulated results for shaded PV systems is not widely studied. The purpose of this article is to investigate the accuracy and quantify the differences between simulated and measured data of partially shaded PV systems, obtained with the widely used tools SAM and PVSyst. Measured data from a PV installation were compared to results from simulations performed using the different shading calculation options available in both tools. The simulated outputs were both underestimated and overestimated in the shading situations. This variation was related to the use of an hourly fraction of shading and, in the case of SAM, due to the limitations of the 3D tools available for representation. Another source of differences between simulated and measured values was the use of uniform shading factors for diffuse and albedo. In addition, the simplification of the 3D model had a significant impact on the predicted energy, mainly on cloudy days. Both software overestimated the electricity production for the entire measurement period, reaching differences between the predicted and the measured energy varying from 9% to 24%. Shaded PV systems must be carefully analyzed, and the simulated results may differ from the measured values, which may even influence the decision on the feasibility of an installation.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-06-16T04:36:23Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/222236
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 0038-092X
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001126647
identifier_str_mv 0038-092X
001126647
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/222236
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Solar energy :international journal for scientists, engineers and technologists in solar energy and its application. New York, N. Y. Vol. 223 (July 2021), p. 182-192
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/222236/2/001126647.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/222236/1/001126647.pdf
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv cc5d7153f6e10f1ab29ee5577138d379
80745bdcac80f8cfa55556b97f49f4ff
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801225020717924352