Agreement between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses and completeness of oral biopsy forms

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Mendez, Marina
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Haas, Alex Nogueira, Rados, Pantelis Varvaki, Sant'Ana Filho, Manoel, Carrard, Vinícius Coelho
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/164376
Resumo: The present study aimed to assess the rate of agreement between clinical and histopathological diagnoses and to report the frequency of completed forms for specimens that were subjected to histopathological examination and retrospectively examined. Data from 8,168 specimens submitted to histopathological examination were retrieved from the records. A total of 5,368 cases were included. Agreement was defined based on the definition of lesion nature according to its diagnostic category. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for each diagnostic category. The highest rate of agreement was observed for periapical lesions (92.6%), followed by potentially malignant disorders (90.1%) and non-neoplastic proliferative disorders (89.3%). Low rates of histopathological confirmation of the clinical impression were observed for mesenchymal tumors (25.0%) and cysts (44.2%). Sensitivity values were > 0.70 for all lesions, except for cysts (0.51). Specificity was relatively high, ranging from 0.97 to 1.00. The frequency of incomplete biopsy forms ranged from 16.8% (malignant tumors of oral mucosal epithelium) to 51.0% (nonspecific inflammatory reaction). The most frequently completed biopsy forms corresponded to epithelial malignant tumors (83.2%) and glandular inflammation (72.3%). In conclusion, there was an acceptable level of agreement. The low level of completeness of biopsy forms indicates little awareness about the relevance of gathering detailed information during clinical examination.
id UFRGS-2_ffa5c1184527d71495de49a390c29785
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/164376
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Mendez, MarinaHaas, Alex NogueiraRados, Pantelis VarvakiSant'Ana Filho, ManoelCarrard, Vinícius Coelho2017-07-25T02:31:50Z20161806-8324http://hdl.handle.net/10183/164376001019034The present study aimed to assess the rate of agreement between clinical and histopathological diagnoses and to report the frequency of completed forms for specimens that were subjected to histopathological examination and retrospectively examined. Data from 8,168 specimens submitted to histopathological examination were retrieved from the records. A total of 5,368 cases were included. Agreement was defined based on the definition of lesion nature according to its diagnostic category. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for each diagnostic category. The highest rate of agreement was observed for periapical lesions (92.6%), followed by potentially malignant disorders (90.1%) and non-neoplastic proliferative disorders (89.3%). Low rates of histopathological confirmation of the clinical impression were observed for mesenchymal tumors (25.0%) and cysts (44.2%). Sensitivity values were > 0.70 for all lesions, except for cysts (0.51). Specificity was relatively high, ranging from 0.97 to 1.00. The frequency of incomplete biopsy forms ranged from 16.8% (malignant tumors of oral mucosal epithelium) to 51.0% (nonspecific inflammatory reaction). The most frequently completed biopsy forms corresponded to epithelial malignant tumors (83.2%) and glandular inflammation (72.3%). In conclusion, there was an acceptable level of agreement. The low level of completeness of biopsy forms indicates little awareness about the relevance of gathering detailed information during clinical examination.application/pdfengBrazilian oral research. São Paulo. Vol. 30, no. 1 (2016), p. e94, 1-9BiópsiaDiagnostico bucalPatologia bucalBiopsyDiagnosisOralReferral and cosultationDiagnostic errorsAgreement between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses and completeness of oral biopsy formsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL001019034.pdf001019034.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf201997http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/164376/1/001019034.pdf1f3e20607f9db739d03842ea9f3f2ae1MD51TEXT001019034.pdf.txt001019034.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain34621http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/164376/2/001019034.pdf.txtdc8255e86936213bb2e21c01f673934fMD52THUMBNAIL001019034.pdf.jpg001019034.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2000http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/164376/3/001019034.pdf.jpg71af26c8f8b37f2215720a929e131571MD5310183/1643762018-11-14 02:41:09.700787oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/164376Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestopendoar:2018-11-14T04:41:09Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Agreement between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses and completeness of oral biopsy forms
title Agreement between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses and completeness of oral biopsy forms
spellingShingle Agreement between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses and completeness of oral biopsy forms
Mendez, Marina
Biópsia
Diagnostico bucal
Patologia bucal
Biopsy
Diagnosis
Oral
Referral and cosultation
Diagnostic errors
title_short Agreement between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses and completeness of oral biopsy forms
title_full Agreement between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses and completeness of oral biopsy forms
title_fullStr Agreement between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses and completeness of oral biopsy forms
title_full_unstemmed Agreement between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses and completeness of oral biopsy forms
title_sort Agreement between clinical and histopathologic diagnoses and completeness of oral biopsy forms
author Mendez, Marina
author_facet Mendez, Marina
Haas, Alex Nogueira
Rados, Pantelis Varvaki
Sant'Ana Filho, Manoel
Carrard, Vinícius Coelho
author_role author
author2 Haas, Alex Nogueira
Rados, Pantelis Varvaki
Sant'Ana Filho, Manoel
Carrard, Vinícius Coelho
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Mendez, Marina
Haas, Alex Nogueira
Rados, Pantelis Varvaki
Sant'Ana Filho, Manoel
Carrard, Vinícius Coelho
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biópsia
Diagnostico bucal
Patologia bucal
topic Biópsia
Diagnostico bucal
Patologia bucal
Biopsy
Diagnosis
Oral
Referral and cosultation
Diagnostic errors
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Biopsy
Diagnosis
Oral
Referral and cosultation
Diagnostic errors
description The present study aimed to assess the rate of agreement between clinical and histopathological diagnoses and to report the frequency of completed forms for specimens that were subjected to histopathological examination and retrospectively examined. Data from 8,168 specimens submitted to histopathological examination were retrieved from the records. A total of 5,368 cases were included. Agreement was defined based on the definition of lesion nature according to its diagnostic category. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for each diagnostic category. The highest rate of agreement was observed for periapical lesions (92.6%), followed by potentially malignant disorders (90.1%) and non-neoplastic proliferative disorders (89.3%). Low rates of histopathological confirmation of the clinical impression were observed for mesenchymal tumors (25.0%) and cysts (44.2%). Sensitivity values were > 0.70 for all lesions, except for cysts (0.51). Specificity was relatively high, ranging from 0.97 to 1.00. The frequency of incomplete biopsy forms ranged from 16.8% (malignant tumors of oral mucosal epithelium) to 51.0% (nonspecific inflammatory reaction). The most frequently completed biopsy forms corresponded to epithelial malignant tumors (83.2%) and glandular inflammation (72.3%). In conclusion, there was an acceptable level of agreement. The low level of completeness of biopsy forms indicates little awareness about the relevance of gathering detailed information during clinical examination.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2016
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2017-07-25T02:31:50Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/other
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/164376
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1806-8324
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 001019034
identifier_str_mv 1806-8324
001019034
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/164376
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Brazilian oral research. São Paulo. Vol. 30, no. 1 (2016), p. e94, 1-9
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/164376/1/001019034.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/164376/2/001019034.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/164376/3/001019034.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 1f3e20607f9db739d03842ea9f3f2ae1
dc8255e86936213bb2e21c01f673934f
71af26c8f8b37f2215720a929e131571
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1801224922934018048