Gender, planning, and academic expectations in first-year higher education students: testing two alternative mediation models

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alfonso,Sonia
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Diniz,António M., Deaño,Manuel, Tellado,Fernando, García-Señorán,Mar, Conde,Ángeles, Iglesias-Sarmiento,Valentín
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722020000100205
Resumo: Abstract We examined the relationships among gender, planning, and academic expectations through the testing of two alternative models with latent variables tested with LISREL 8.80: one model considered planning as a mediator of the relationship between gender and academic expectations, and the other model considered academic expectations as mediators of the relationship between gender and planning. Participants were 662 first-year higher-education students from two academic years, predominantly female (60%) and mainly with majors in the juridical-social field (66.2%). The Inventario sobre Estrategias Metacognitivas (IEM; Inventory of Metacognitive Strategies) and the Academic Perceptions Questionnaire (APQ) were applied at the beginning of the first semester to assess planning and academic expectations, respectively. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the IEM’s structure after examining its psychometric properties with the sample from the first academic year (N = 338). The test of the alternative mediation models with the full sample indicates that the best model was that with planning as a mediator. In this model, gender directly predicted only two APQ academic expectations, but with the mediation of planning, gender predicted all seven academic expectations. Women showed higher levels of academic expectations and planning than did men. The results are discussed at both the theoretical and practical levels.
id UFRGS-5_646702b13ccb5e691e8cd1cf3ad506e6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-79722020000100205
network_acronym_str UFRGS-5
network_name_str Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Gender, planning, and academic expectations in first-year higher education students: testing two alternative mediation modelsCollege studentsPlanningAcademic expectationsGenderStructural equation modelingMeasurementinvarianceAbstract We examined the relationships among gender, planning, and academic expectations through the testing of two alternative models with latent variables tested with LISREL 8.80: one model considered planning as a mediator of the relationship between gender and academic expectations, and the other model considered academic expectations as mediators of the relationship between gender and planning. Participants were 662 first-year higher-education students from two academic years, predominantly female (60%) and mainly with majors in the juridical-social field (66.2%). The Inventario sobre Estrategias Metacognitivas (IEM; Inventory of Metacognitive Strategies) and the Academic Perceptions Questionnaire (APQ) were applied at the beginning of the first semester to assess planning and academic expectations, respectively. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the IEM’s structure after examining its psychometric properties with the sample from the first academic year (N = 338). The test of the alternative mediation models with the full sample indicates that the best model was that with planning as a mediator. In this model, gender directly predicted only two APQ academic expectations, but with the mediation of planning, gender predicted all seven academic expectations. Women showed higher levels of academic expectations and planning than did men. The results are discussed at both the theoretical and practical levels.Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2020-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722020000100205Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica v.33 2020reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGS10.1186/s41155-020-00142-zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlfonso,SoniaDiniz,António M.Deaño,ManuelTellado,FernandoGarcía-Señorán,MarConde,ÁngelesIglesias-Sarmiento,Valentíneng2020-06-16T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-79722020000100205Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prc/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpprc@springeropen.com1678-71530102-7972opendoar:2020-06-16T00:00Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Gender, planning, and academic expectations in first-year higher education students: testing two alternative mediation models
title Gender, planning, and academic expectations in first-year higher education students: testing two alternative mediation models
spellingShingle Gender, planning, and academic expectations in first-year higher education students: testing two alternative mediation models
Alfonso,Sonia
College students
Planning
Academic expectations
Gender
Structural equation modeling
Measurementinvariance
title_short Gender, planning, and academic expectations in first-year higher education students: testing two alternative mediation models
title_full Gender, planning, and academic expectations in first-year higher education students: testing two alternative mediation models
title_fullStr Gender, planning, and academic expectations in first-year higher education students: testing two alternative mediation models
title_full_unstemmed Gender, planning, and academic expectations in first-year higher education students: testing two alternative mediation models
title_sort Gender, planning, and academic expectations in first-year higher education students: testing two alternative mediation models
author Alfonso,Sonia
author_facet Alfonso,Sonia
Diniz,António M.
Deaño,Manuel
Tellado,Fernando
García-Señorán,Mar
Conde,Ángeles
Iglesias-Sarmiento,Valentín
author_role author
author2 Diniz,António M.
Deaño,Manuel
Tellado,Fernando
García-Señorán,Mar
Conde,Ángeles
Iglesias-Sarmiento,Valentín
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alfonso,Sonia
Diniz,António M.
Deaño,Manuel
Tellado,Fernando
García-Señorán,Mar
Conde,Ángeles
Iglesias-Sarmiento,Valentín
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv College students
Planning
Academic expectations
Gender
Structural equation modeling
Measurementinvariance
topic College students
Planning
Academic expectations
Gender
Structural equation modeling
Measurementinvariance
description Abstract We examined the relationships among gender, planning, and academic expectations through the testing of two alternative models with latent variables tested with LISREL 8.80: one model considered planning as a mediator of the relationship between gender and academic expectations, and the other model considered academic expectations as mediators of the relationship between gender and planning. Participants were 662 first-year higher-education students from two academic years, predominantly female (60%) and mainly with majors in the juridical-social field (66.2%). The Inventario sobre Estrategias Metacognitivas (IEM; Inventory of Metacognitive Strategies) and the Academic Perceptions Questionnaire (APQ) were applied at the beginning of the first semester to assess planning and academic expectations, respectively. Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the IEM’s structure after examining its psychometric properties with the sample from the first academic year (N = 338). The test of the alternative mediation models with the full sample indicates that the best model was that with planning as a mediator. In this model, gender directly predicted only two APQ academic expectations, but with the mediation of planning, gender predicted all seven academic expectations. Women showed higher levels of academic expectations and planning than did men. The results are discussed at both the theoretical and practical levels.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722020000100205
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722020000100205
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1186/s41155-020-00142-z
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica v.33 2020
reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
collection Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv prc@springeropen.com
_version_ 1750134867057704960