Ethical Standards of Scientific Research Involving Human Subjects in Brazil: Perspectives Concerning Psychology

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leitão,Selma
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Falcão,Jorge Tarcísio da Rocha, Maluf,Maria Regina
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722015000600040
Resumo: AbstractBrazilian associations for research in human, social and applied social sciences have long sought ethical aspects regulation compatible with the epistemological, theoretical and methodological specificities of these sciences. Consequently, the Brazilian regulatory system (Research Ethics Committees/CEPs of the National Research Ethics Commission/CONEP) is currently undergoing an important review process. This article presents the positions taken by the National Association of Research and Postgraduate Studies in Psychology - ANPEPP. The article: (1) highlights the origins of the current ethics review model, based on biomedical research; (2) summarizes criticisms recurrent to this model; (3) identifies the directions required for the improvement of the system; and (4) lists the challenges to be overcome in the current process of creating specific regulations for the human and social sciences. The considerations presented highlight two crucial points that challenge the construction of a specific resolution for research ethics in the human and social sciences: (1) the clear characterization of what is meant by 'research in the human and social sciences' - and that would, therefore, have its ethical review regulated from the perspective of the specific resolution for the human and social sciences; and (2) the definition of parameters from which different risk levels in studies can be identified.
id UFRGS-5_b074cdbacfd20cdce476d3394511937b
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-79722015000600040
network_acronym_str UFRGS-5
network_name_str Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Ethical Standards of Scientific Research Involving Human Subjects in Brazil: Perspectives Concerning Psychologyresearch ethicshuman subjectsANPEPP ForumAbstractBrazilian associations for research in human, social and applied social sciences have long sought ethical aspects regulation compatible with the epistemological, theoretical and methodological specificities of these sciences. Consequently, the Brazilian regulatory system (Research Ethics Committees/CEPs of the National Research Ethics Commission/CONEP) is currently undergoing an important review process. This article presents the positions taken by the National Association of Research and Postgraduate Studies in Psychology - ANPEPP. The article: (1) highlights the origins of the current ethics review model, based on biomedical research; (2) summarizes criticisms recurrent to this model; (3) identifies the directions required for the improvement of the system; and (4) lists the challenges to be overcome in the current process of creating specific regulations for the human and social sciences. The considerations presented highlight two crucial points that challenge the construction of a specific resolution for research ethics in the human and social sciences: (1) the clear characterization of what is meant by 'research in the human and social sciences' - and that would, therefore, have its ethical review regulated from the perspective of the specific resolution for the human and social sciences; and (2) the definition of parameters from which different risk levels in studies can be identified.Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul2015-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722015000600040Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica v.28 suppl.1 2015reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGS10.1590/1678-7153.2015284007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLeitão,SelmaFalcão,Jorge Tarcísio da RochaMaluf,Maria Reginaeng2015-11-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-79722015000600040Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prc/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpprc@springeropen.com1678-71530102-7972opendoar:2015-11-13T00:00Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ethical Standards of Scientific Research Involving Human Subjects in Brazil: Perspectives Concerning Psychology
title Ethical Standards of Scientific Research Involving Human Subjects in Brazil: Perspectives Concerning Psychology
spellingShingle Ethical Standards of Scientific Research Involving Human Subjects in Brazil: Perspectives Concerning Psychology
Leitão,Selma
research ethics
human subjects
ANPEPP Forum
title_short Ethical Standards of Scientific Research Involving Human Subjects in Brazil: Perspectives Concerning Psychology
title_full Ethical Standards of Scientific Research Involving Human Subjects in Brazil: Perspectives Concerning Psychology
title_fullStr Ethical Standards of Scientific Research Involving Human Subjects in Brazil: Perspectives Concerning Psychology
title_full_unstemmed Ethical Standards of Scientific Research Involving Human Subjects in Brazil: Perspectives Concerning Psychology
title_sort Ethical Standards of Scientific Research Involving Human Subjects in Brazil: Perspectives Concerning Psychology
author Leitão,Selma
author_facet Leitão,Selma
Falcão,Jorge Tarcísio da Rocha
Maluf,Maria Regina
author_role author
author2 Falcão,Jorge Tarcísio da Rocha
Maluf,Maria Regina
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leitão,Selma
Falcão,Jorge Tarcísio da Rocha
Maluf,Maria Regina
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv research ethics
human subjects
ANPEPP Forum
topic research ethics
human subjects
ANPEPP Forum
description AbstractBrazilian associations for research in human, social and applied social sciences have long sought ethical aspects regulation compatible with the epistemological, theoretical and methodological specificities of these sciences. Consequently, the Brazilian regulatory system (Research Ethics Committees/CEPs of the National Research Ethics Commission/CONEP) is currently undergoing an important review process. This article presents the positions taken by the National Association of Research and Postgraduate Studies in Psychology - ANPEPP. The article: (1) highlights the origins of the current ethics review model, based on biomedical research; (2) summarizes criticisms recurrent to this model; (3) identifies the directions required for the improvement of the system; and (4) lists the challenges to be overcome in the current process of creating specific regulations for the human and social sciences. The considerations presented highlight two crucial points that challenge the construction of a specific resolution for research ethics in the human and social sciences: (1) the clear characterization of what is meant by 'research in the human and social sciences' - and that would, therefore, have its ethical review regulated from the perspective of the specific resolution for the human and social sciences; and (2) the definition of parameters from which different risk levels in studies can be identified.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722015000600040
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-79722015000600040
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1678-7153.2015284007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Curso de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica v.28 suppl.1 2015
reponame:Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
collection Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Psicologia (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv prc@springeropen.com
_version_ 1750134866226184192