Managerial aspects of Brazilian scientific policy: a look at the scientific field of sociology against the evaluation criteria CNPq and CAPES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Kátia
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Oddone, Nanci, Café, Anderson Luis da Paixão, Menezes, Vinícios
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Em Questão (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/36908
Resumo: Different sociologists of science believe that the construction of academic reputation within the scientific field is related to the ability of the researcher to reproduce the objective criteria that embody the management structure evaluation of scientific activity. In this sense, this research investigates the causal relationship between scientific and academic reputation in sociology. For this, first identified the criteria used by CNPq and CAPES to evaluate scientific output. Later, chose up two groups of sociologists, mapping to scientific production of both groups published between 2007 and 2009. Finally, we compared this production criteria CNPq and CAPES. The results revealed that the book was the least used type of publication and that over 80% of the scientific production is published in the national language. The research also concluded that the scientific production of the two groups does not meet the criteria of the reputation system of Sociology in Brazil.
id UFRGS-8_49626d32238058030209665561618c5a
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/36908
network_acronym_str UFRGS-8
network_name_str Em Questão (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Managerial aspects of Brazilian scientific policy: a look at the scientific field of sociology against the evaluation criteria CNPq and CAPESAspectos gerenciais da política científica brasileira: um olhar sobre a produção científica do campo da sociologia face aos critérios de avaliação do CNPq e da CAPESPolítica científica. Produção científica. Sociologia brasileira. Critério de avaliação – CAPES. Critério de avaliação – CNPq.Produção científicaPolitical science. Scientific production. Brazilian sociology. Criteria for evaluation - CAPES. Criteria for evaluation - CNPq.Different sociologists of science believe that the construction of academic reputation within the scientific field is related to the ability of the researcher to reproduce the objective criteria that embody the management structure evaluation of scientific activity. In this sense, this research investigates the causal relationship between scientific and academic reputation in sociology. For this, first identified the criteria used by CNPq and CAPES to evaluate scientific output. Later, chose up two groups of sociologists, mapping to scientific production of both groups published between 2007 and 2009. Finally, we compared this production criteria CNPq and CAPES. The results revealed that the book was the least used type of publication and that over 80% of the scientific production is published in the national language. The research also concluded that the scientific production of the two groups does not meet the criteria of the reputation system of Sociology in Brazil.Diferentes sociólogos da ciência acreditam que a construção da reputação acadêmica dentro do campo científico está diretamente relacionada à capacidade do pesquisador em reproduzir, de forma competente, os critérios objetivos que dão corpo à estrutura gerencial de avaliação da atividade científica. Nesse sentido, esta pesquisa investiga a relação de causalidade entre produção científica e reputação acadêmica na sociologia brasileira. Para isto, primeiramente foram identificados os critérios utilizados pelo CNPq e CAPES para avaliar a produção científica. Posteriormente, escolheram-se dois grupos de sociólogos – os bolsistas de produtividade PQ 1A e os recém-doutores, mapeando-se a produção científica de ambos os grupos publicada entre 2007 e 2009. Por último, comparou-se essa produção aos critérios do CNPq e da CAPES. Esta é uma pesquisa descritiva e documental que trouxe como resultados aspectos da trajetória acadêmica dos bolsistas PQ1A e dos egressos; bem como o comportamento da produção científica do universo pesquisado.Managerial aspects of Brazilian scientific policy: a look at the scientific field of sociology against the evaluation criteria CNPq and CAPESAbstract: Different sociologists of science believe that the construction of academic reputation within the scientific field is related to the ability of the researcher to reproduce the objective criteria that embody the management structure evaluation of scientific activity. In this sense, this research investigates the causal relationship between scientific and academic reputation in sociology. For this, first identified the criteria used by CNPq and CAPES to evaluate scientific output. Later, chose up two groups of sociologists, mapping to scientific production of both groups published between 2007 and 2009. Finally, we compared this production criteria CNPq and CAPES. The results revealed that the book was the least used type of publication and that over 80% of the scientific production is published in the national language. The research also concluded that the scientific production of the two groups does not meet the criteria of the reputation system of Sociology in Brazil.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)2013-07-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/36908Em Questão; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2013); 187-212Em Questão; Vol. 19 Núm. 1 (2013); 187-212Em Questão; v. 19 n. 1 (2013); 187-2121808-52451807-8893reponame:Em Questão (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/36908/31550Copyright (c) 2013 Kátia Carvalho, Nanci Oddone, Anderson Luis da Paixão Café, Vinícios Menezeshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarvalho, KátiaOddone, NanciCafé, Anderson Luis da PaixãoMenezes, Vinícios2024-03-22T18:48:45Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/36908Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/emquestao/PUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/oaiemquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br1808-52451807-8893opendoar:2024-03-22T18:48:45Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Managerial aspects of Brazilian scientific policy: a look at the scientific field of sociology against the evaluation criteria CNPq and CAPES
Aspectos gerenciais da política científica brasileira: um olhar sobre a produção científica do campo da sociologia face aos critérios de avaliação do CNPq e da CAPES
title Managerial aspects of Brazilian scientific policy: a look at the scientific field of sociology against the evaluation criteria CNPq and CAPES
spellingShingle Managerial aspects of Brazilian scientific policy: a look at the scientific field of sociology against the evaluation criteria CNPq and CAPES
Carvalho, Kátia
Política científica. Produção científica. Sociologia brasileira. Critério de avaliação – CAPES. Critério de avaliação – CNPq.
Produção científica
Political science. Scientific production. Brazilian sociology. Criteria for evaluation - CAPES. Criteria for evaluation - CNPq.
title_short Managerial aspects of Brazilian scientific policy: a look at the scientific field of sociology against the evaluation criteria CNPq and CAPES
title_full Managerial aspects of Brazilian scientific policy: a look at the scientific field of sociology against the evaluation criteria CNPq and CAPES
title_fullStr Managerial aspects of Brazilian scientific policy: a look at the scientific field of sociology against the evaluation criteria CNPq and CAPES
title_full_unstemmed Managerial aspects of Brazilian scientific policy: a look at the scientific field of sociology against the evaluation criteria CNPq and CAPES
title_sort Managerial aspects of Brazilian scientific policy: a look at the scientific field of sociology against the evaluation criteria CNPq and CAPES
author Carvalho, Kátia
author_facet Carvalho, Kátia
Oddone, Nanci
Café, Anderson Luis da Paixão
Menezes, Vinícios
author_role author
author2 Oddone, Nanci
Café, Anderson Luis da Paixão
Menezes, Vinícios
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Kátia
Oddone, Nanci
Café, Anderson Luis da Paixão
Menezes, Vinícios
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Política científica. Produção científica. Sociologia brasileira. Critério de avaliação – CAPES. Critério de avaliação – CNPq.
Produção científica
Political science. Scientific production. Brazilian sociology. Criteria for evaluation - CAPES. Criteria for evaluation - CNPq.
topic Política científica. Produção científica. Sociologia brasileira. Critério de avaliação – CAPES. Critério de avaliação – CNPq.
Produção científica
Political science. Scientific production. Brazilian sociology. Criteria for evaluation - CAPES. Criteria for evaluation - CNPq.
description Different sociologists of science believe that the construction of academic reputation within the scientific field is related to the ability of the researcher to reproduce the objective criteria that embody the management structure evaluation of scientific activity. In this sense, this research investigates the causal relationship between scientific and academic reputation in sociology. For this, first identified the criteria used by CNPq and CAPES to evaluate scientific output. Later, chose up two groups of sociologists, mapping to scientific production of both groups published between 2007 and 2009. Finally, we compared this production criteria CNPq and CAPES. The results revealed that the book was the least used type of publication and that over 80% of the scientific production is published in the national language. The research also concluded that the scientific production of the two groups does not meet the criteria of the reputation system of Sociology in Brazil.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-07-25
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/36908
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/36908
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/36908/31550
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 Kátia Carvalho, Nanci Oddone, Anderson Luis da Paixão Café, Vinícios Menezes
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2013 Kátia Carvalho, Nanci Oddone, Anderson Luis da Paixão Café, Vinícios Menezes
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Em Questão; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2013); 187-212
Em Questão; Vol. 19 Núm. 1 (2013); 187-212
Em Questão; v. 19 n. 1 (2013); 187-212
1808-5245
1807-8893
reponame:Em Questão (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Em Questão (Online)
collection Em Questão (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv emquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766159895035904

Registros relacionados