The Sociology of Bourdieu: evaluation of the scientific production of productivity researchers in Information Science

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alves, Bruno Henrique
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Oliveira, Ely Francina Tannuri de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Em Questão (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/93092
Resumo: The scientific field of Information Science is a hierarchical space of positions and is formed by objective relations. This study aims to understand the generation and construction of knowledge by researchers in Information Science with productivity grants in Brazil. Specifically, this study sets out to present Brazilian researchers in Information Science with research productivity grants and to group the different articles they have written, according to the themes of the Working Groups in the Brazilian National Association for Research and Post-Graduate Education in Information Science, known as ANCIB. The research sample consisted of a total of 47 researchers in Information Science with productivity grants, in the first five years from 2005 to 2009, and of 56 researchers in the second five-year period from 2010 to 2014. A total of 317 articles were published in journals in the first five years, and 597 in the second five-year period. These articles were used to make groupings based on the themes of the 11 Working Groups of the Brazilian National Association for Research and Post-Graduate Education in Information Science and to generate the two-mode networks by use of the Ucinet software. We have found that scientific work aims to establish adequate knowledge to operate its development from the objective relations presented by the researchers. We conclude that Brazilian researchers in Information Science with productivity grants involved in such a power game have specific interests defined by that game’s mode of operation; that is, there is always competition for prizes, for the best papers, for scientific coordination, among other kinds of competition.
id UFRGS-8_723520da4613719f8aa867fa2ba435c0
oai_identifier_str oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/93092
network_acronym_str UFRGS-8
network_name_str Em Questão (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The Sociology of Bourdieu: evaluation of the scientific production of productivity researchers in Information ScienceSociologia de Bourdieu: avaliação da produção científica dos pesquisadores de produtividade em pesquisa em Ciência da InformaçãoCampo científicoConstrução do conhecimentoGTs da ANCIB.Scientific fieldKnowledge ConstructionWorking Groups of the ANCIB.The scientific field of Information Science is a hierarchical space of positions and is formed by objective relations. This study aims to understand the generation and construction of knowledge by researchers in Information Science with productivity grants in Brazil. Specifically, this study sets out to present Brazilian researchers in Information Science with research productivity grants and to group the different articles they have written, according to the themes of the Working Groups in the Brazilian National Association for Research and Post-Graduate Education in Information Science, known as ANCIB. The research sample consisted of a total of 47 researchers in Information Science with productivity grants, in the first five years from 2005 to 2009, and of 56 researchers in the second five-year period from 2010 to 2014. A total of 317 articles were published in journals in the first five years, and 597 in the second five-year period. These articles were used to make groupings based on the themes of the 11 Working Groups of the Brazilian National Association for Research and Post-Graduate Education in Information Science and to generate the two-mode networks by use of the Ucinet software. We have found that scientific work aims to establish adequate knowledge to operate its development from the objective relations presented by the researchers. We conclude that Brazilian researchers in Information Science with productivity grants involved in such a power game have specific interests defined by that game’s mode of operation; that is, there is always competition for prizes, for the best papers, for scientific coordination, among other kinds of competition.O campo científico da Ciência da Informação é um espaço hierarquizado de posições e formado por relações objetivas. Esta pesquisa objetivou compreender a geração e construção do conhecimento dos pesquisadores de produtividade em pesquisa em Ciência da Informação. De forma específica, propõe-se a apresentar os pesquisadores de produtividade em pesquisa em Ciência da Informação e agrupar os diferentes artigos produzidos por eles, segundo os temas dos Grupos de Trabalhos da Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação. Como procedimento, a população da pesquisa foi constituída por um total de 47 pesquisadores de produtividade em pesquisa em Ciência da Informação, no primeiro quinquênio 2005-2009, e 56, no segundo quinquênio 2010-2014. Utilizou-se um total de 317 artigos completos publicados em periódicos, no primeiro quinquênio, e 597, no segundo quinquênio. Esses artigos foram utilizados para desenvolver os agrupamentos com base nos temas dos 11 Grupos de Trabalhos da Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação e para gerar as redes two-mode por meio do software Ucinet. Como resultado, identificou-se que a construção do trabalho científico visa estabelecer um conhecimento adequado para orientar o funcionamento desse trabalho a partir das relações objetivas apresentadas pelos pesquisadores. Como conclusão, pode-se destacar que os pesquisadores de produtividade em pesquisa em Ciência da Informação, envolvidos nesse jogo de poder, têm interesses específicos definidos pela lógica do jogo, ou seja, sempre há competição e disputas por troféus, como, por exemplo, na disputa dos melhores trabalhos, na disputa pela coordenação científica, entre outras.Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)2020-09-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/9309210.19132/1808-5245263.121-145Em Questão; v. 26, n. 3, set./dez. 2020; 121-145Em Questão; v. 26, n. 3, set./dez. 2020; 121-145Em Questão; v. 26, n. 3, set./dez. 2020; 121-1451808-52451807-8893reponame:Em Questão (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/93092/56607Copyright (c) 2020 Bruno Henrique Alves, Ely Francina Tannuri de Oliveirahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAlves, Bruno HenriqueOliveira, Ely Francina Tannuri de2024-03-19T13:17:57Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/93092Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/emquestao/PUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/EmQuestao/oaiemquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br1808-52451807-8893opendoar:2024-03-19T13:17:57Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Sociology of Bourdieu: evaluation of the scientific production of productivity researchers in Information Science
Sociologia de Bourdieu: avaliação da produção científica dos pesquisadores de produtividade em pesquisa em Ciência da Informação
title The Sociology of Bourdieu: evaluation of the scientific production of productivity researchers in Information Science
spellingShingle The Sociology of Bourdieu: evaluation of the scientific production of productivity researchers in Information Science
Alves, Bruno Henrique
Campo científico
Construção do conhecimento
GTs da ANCIB.
Scientific field
Knowledge Construction
Working Groups of the ANCIB.
title_short The Sociology of Bourdieu: evaluation of the scientific production of productivity researchers in Information Science
title_full The Sociology of Bourdieu: evaluation of the scientific production of productivity researchers in Information Science
title_fullStr The Sociology of Bourdieu: evaluation of the scientific production of productivity researchers in Information Science
title_full_unstemmed The Sociology of Bourdieu: evaluation of the scientific production of productivity researchers in Information Science
title_sort The Sociology of Bourdieu: evaluation of the scientific production of productivity researchers in Information Science
author Alves, Bruno Henrique
author_facet Alves, Bruno Henrique
Oliveira, Ely Francina Tannuri de
author_role author
author2 Oliveira, Ely Francina Tannuri de
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alves, Bruno Henrique
Oliveira, Ely Francina Tannuri de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Campo científico
Construção do conhecimento
GTs da ANCIB.
Scientific field
Knowledge Construction
Working Groups of the ANCIB.
topic Campo científico
Construção do conhecimento
GTs da ANCIB.
Scientific field
Knowledge Construction
Working Groups of the ANCIB.
description The scientific field of Information Science is a hierarchical space of positions and is formed by objective relations. This study aims to understand the generation and construction of knowledge by researchers in Information Science with productivity grants in Brazil. Specifically, this study sets out to present Brazilian researchers in Information Science with research productivity grants and to group the different articles they have written, according to the themes of the Working Groups in the Brazilian National Association for Research and Post-Graduate Education in Information Science, known as ANCIB. The research sample consisted of a total of 47 researchers in Information Science with productivity grants, in the first five years from 2005 to 2009, and of 56 researchers in the second five-year period from 2010 to 2014. A total of 317 articles were published in journals in the first five years, and 597 in the second five-year period. These articles were used to make groupings based on the themes of the 11 Working Groups of the Brazilian National Association for Research and Post-Graduate Education in Information Science and to generate the two-mode networks by use of the Ucinet software. We have found that scientific work aims to establish adequate knowledge to operate its development from the objective relations presented by the researchers. We conclude that Brazilian researchers in Information Science with productivity grants involved in such a power game have specific interests defined by that game’s mode of operation; that is, there is always competition for prizes, for the best papers, for scientific coordination, among other kinds of competition.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-09-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/93092
10.19132/1808-5245263.121-145
url https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/93092
identifier_str_mv 10.19132/1808-5245263.121-145
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/EmQuestao/article/view/93092/56607
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Bruno Henrique Alves, Ely Francina Tannuri de Oliveira
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2020 Bruno Henrique Alves, Ely Francina Tannuri de Oliveira
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biblioteconomia e Comunicação, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação (Porto Alegre/RS)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Em Questão; v. 26, n. 3, set./dez. 2020; 121-145
Em Questão; v. 26, n. 3, set./dez. 2020; 121-145
Em Questão; v. 26, n. 3, set./dez. 2020; 121-145
1808-5245
1807-8893
reponame:Em Questão (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Em Questão (Online)
collection Em Questão (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Em Questão (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv emquestao@ufrgs.br||emquestao@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1799766161562271744

Registros relacionados