Parrhesiastic Aufklärung as Democratic Government of Self
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Educação & Realidade |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/118193 |
Resumo: | The dispute between modernity and postmodernity calls into question the emancipatory potential of reason and, to escape extremist positions on this, we argue that Foucault’s reading of the Kantian question of Aufklärung offers not only principles to critically mark out the advances and limits of modernity but also arguments to think about the human formation inherent to Aufklärung. For Foucault, the Greco-Roman heritage of the Kantian Aufklärung shows that his own historical ontology is a tributary of the philosophical-practical tradition linked to parrhesia-libertas, which posits culture and education beyond the negation of modernity as a whole. Therefore, formation implies understanding the world in which one lives and the dual human condition of minority and majority. |
id |
UFRGS-9_fcecc3f640bf1a25b5a80a3f9bf3cff0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/118193 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-9 |
network_name_str |
Educação & Realidade |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Parrhesiastic Aufklärung as Democratic Government of SelfAufklärung Parresiástica como Governo Democrático de Si MesmoPós-ModernidadeAufklärung kantianaParresíaFormaçãoPost-Modernity; Kantian Aufklärung; Parrhesia; FormationThe dispute between modernity and postmodernity calls into question the emancipatory potential of reason and, to escape extremist positions on this, we argue that Foucault’s reading of the Kantian question of Aufklärung offers not only principles to critically mark out the advances and limits of modernity but also arguments to think about the human formation inherent to Aufklärung. For Foucault, the Greco-Roman heritage of the Kantian Aufklärung shows that his own historical ontology is a tributary of the philosophical-practical tradition linked to parrhesia-libertas, which posits culture and education beyond the negation of modernity as a whole. Therefore, formation implies understanding the world in which one lives and the dual human condition of minority and majority.A disputa entre modernidade e pós-modernidade coloca em xeque o potencial emancipador da razão e, para fugir de posições extremistas acerca disso, entende-se que a leitura de Foucault sobre a questão kantiana da Aufklärung oferece, além de princípios para balizar criticamente os avanços e os limites da modernidade, argumentos para se pensar a formação humana inerente à Aufklärung. A herança greco-romana da Aufklärung kantiana, para Foucault, mostra que sua própria ontologia histórica é tributária da tradição filosófico-prática ligada à parresía-libertas, que põe cultura e educação para além da negação em bloco da modernidade. Assim, a formação implica a compreensão do mundo em que se vive e da dupla condição humana de menoridade e maioridade.FACED - UFRGS2022-11-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/118193Educação & Realidade [Education & Reality]; Vol. 47 (2022)Educação & Realidade; v. 47 (2022)2175-62360100-3143reponame:Educação & Realidadeinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSporenghttps://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/118193/87067https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/118193/87068Copyright (c) 2022 Educação & Realidadehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRossetto, Miguel da SilvaDalbosco, Claudio AlmirVolpato Dutra, Delamar JoséBertotto, Claudio2022-12-26T18:17:12Zoai:seer.ufrgs.br:article/118193Revistahttps://seer.ufrgs.br/educacaoerealidadePUBhttps://seer.ufrgs.br/educacaoerealidade/oai||educreal@ufrgs.br2175-62360100-3143opendoar:2022-12-26T18:17:12Educação & Realidade - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Parrhesiastic Aufklärung as Democratic Government of Self Aufklärung Parresiástica como Governo Democrático de Si Mesmo |
title |
Parrhesiastic Aufklärung as Democratic Government of Self |
spellingShingle |
Parrhesiastic Aufklärung as Democratic Government of Self Rossetto, Miguel da Silva Pós-Modernidade Aufklärung kantiana Parresía Formação Post-Modernity; Kantian Aufklärung; Parrhesia; Formation |
title_short |
Parrhesiastic Aufklärung as Democratic Government of Self |
title_full |
Parrhesiastic Aufklärung as Democratic Government of Self |
title_fullStr |
Parrhesiastic Aufklärung as Democratic Government of Self |
title_full_unstemmed |
Parrhesiastic Aufklärung as Democratic Government of Self |
title_sort |
Parrhesiastic Aufklärung as Democratic Government of Self |
author |
Rossetto, Miguel da Silva |
author_facet |
Rossetto, Miguel da Silva Dalbosco, Claudio Almir Volpato Dutra, Delamar José Bertotto, Claudio |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dalbosco, Claudio Almir Volpato Dutra, Delamar José Bertotto, Claudio |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rossetto, Miguel da Silva Dalbosco, Claudio Almir Volpato Dutra, Delamar José Bertotto, Claudio |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pós-Modernidade Aufklärung kantiana Parresía Formação Post-Modernity; Kantian Aufklärung; Parrhesia; Formation |
topic |
Pós-Modernidade Aufklärung kantiana Parresía Formação Post-Modernity; Kantian Aufklärung; Parrhesia; Formation |
description |
The dispute between modernity and postmodernity calls into question the emancipatory potential of reason and, to escape extremist positions on this, we argue that Foucault’s reading of the Kantian question of Aufklärung offers not only principles to critically mark out the advances and limits of modernity but also arguments to think about the human formation inherent to Aufklärung. For Foucault, the Greco-Roman heritage of the Kantian Aufklärung shows that his own historical ontology is a tributary of the philosophical-practical tradition linked to parrhesia-libertas, which posits culture and education beyond the negation of modernity as a whole. Therefore, formation implies understanding the world in which one lives and the dual human condition of minority and majority. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-11-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/118193 |
url |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/118193 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/118193/87067 https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/educacaoerealidade/article/view/118193/87068 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Educação & Realidade https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Educação & Realidade https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FACED - UFRGS |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
FACED - UFRGS |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Educação & Realidade [Education & Reality]; Vol. 47 (2022) Educação & Realidade; v. 47 (2022) 2175-6236 0100-3143 reponame:Educação & Realidade instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Educação & Realidade |
collection |
Educação & Realidade |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Educação & Realidade - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||educreal@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1799766989273563136 |