Shared decision-making when choosing the feeding method of patients with severe dementia: a systematic review

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Derech,Rodrigo D’Agostini
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Neves,Fabricio de Souza
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-98232018000200232
Resumo: Abstract Objectives: To evaluate whether the use of a support tool for shared decision-making in the choice of feeding method for patients with severe dementia can benefit the patient/caregiver dyad, and to evaluate the quality of the decision-making process. Method: A search was performed in the Medline, LILACS, IBECS, SciELO, WHOLIS databases for randomized controlled trials, whether double-blind or otherwise, and quasi-experimental, cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional observational studies in Portuguese, Spanish, English and French. Results: Eight articles were found that showed that the use of a decision support tool, as an aid for the shared decision-making method, is beneficial as it reduces decisional conflict and increases the knowledge of caregivers about the subject. The quality of the decision-making process is unsatisfactory due to the low frequency of discussions between caregivers and the health team and the poor evaluation of caregivers about the participation of the team in the decision-making process. Conclusion: Decision support tools provide benefits for caregivers/patients undergoing the difficult task of deciding about feeding methods. Findings suggest that the current quality of decision-making is inadequate.
id UFRJ-10_92a388dd8a44dc3c369b672bc2c4b075
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1809-98232018000200232
network_acronym_str UFRJ-10
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
repository_id_str
spelling Shared decision-making when choosing the feeding method of patients with severe dementia: a systematic reviewDementiaDeglutition DisordersDecision MakingDecision Support Techniques.Abstract Objectives: To evaluate whether the use of a support tool for shared decision-making in the choice of feeding method for patients with severe dementia can benefit the patient/caregiver dyad, and to evaluate the quality of the decision-making process. Method: A search was performed in the Medline, LILACS, IBECS, SciELO, WHOLIS databases for randomized controlled trials, whether double-blind or otherwise, and quasi-experimental, cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional observational studies in Portuguese, Spanish, English and French. Results: Eight articles were found that showed that the use of a decision support tool, as an aid for the shared decision-making method, is beneficial as it reduces decisional conflict and increases the knowledge of caregivers about the subject. The quality of the decision-making process is unsatisfactory due to the low frequency of discussions between caregivers and the health team and the poor evaluation of caregivers about the participation of the team in the decision-making process. Conclusion: Decision support tools provide benefits for caregivers/patients undergoing the difficult task of deciding about feeding methods. Findings suggest that the current quality of decision-making is inadequate.Universidade do Estado do Rio Janeiro2018-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-98232018000200232Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia v.21 n.2 2018reponame:Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologiainstname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/1981-22562018021.170169info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDerech,Rodrigo D’AgostiniNeves,Fabricio de Souzaeng2018-06-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1809-98232018000200232Revistahttp://revista.unati.uerj.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=1809-9823&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistabgg@gmail.com1981-22561809-9823opendoar:2018-06-04T00:00Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Shared decision-making when choosing the feeding method of patients with severe dementia: a systematic review
title Shared decision-making when choosing the feeding method of patients with severe dementia: a systematic review
spellingShingle Shared decision-making when choosing the feeding method of patients with severe dementia: a systematic review
Derech,Rodrigo D’Agostini
Dementia
Deglutition Disorders
Decision Making
Decision Support Techniques.
title_short Shared decision-making when choosing the feeding method of patients with severe dementia: a systematic review
title_full Shared decision-making when choosing the feeding method of patients with severe dementia: a systematic review
title_fullStr Shared decision-making when choosing the feeding method of patients with severe dementia: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Shared decision-making when choosing the feeding method of patients with severe dementia: a systematic review
title_sort Shared decision-making when choosing the feeding method of patients with severe dementia: a systematic review
author Derech,Rodrigo D’Agostini
author_facet Derech,Rodrigo D’Agostini
Neves,Fabricio de Souza
author_role author
author2 Neves,Fabricio de Souza
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Derech,Rodrigo D’Agostini
Neves,Fabricio de Souza
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dementia
Deglutition Disorders
Decision Making
Decision Support Techniques.
topic Dementia
Deglutition Disorders
Decision Making
Decision Support Techniques.
description Abstract Objectives: To evaluate whether the use of a support tool for shared decision-making in the choice of feeding method for patients with severe dementia can benefit the patient/caregiver dyad, and to evaluate the quality of the decision-making process. Method: A search was performed in the Medline, LILACS, IBECS, SciELO, WHOLIS databases for randomized controlled trials, whether double-blind or otherwise, and quasi-experimental, cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional observational studies in Portuguese, Spanish, English and French. Results: Eight articles were found that showed that the use of a decision support tool, as an aid for the shared decision-making method, is beneficial as it reduces decisional conflict and increases the knowledge of caregivers about the subject. The quality of the decision-making process is unsatisfactory due to the low frequency of discussions between caregivers and the health team and the poor evaluation of caregivers about the participation of the team in the decision-making process. Conclusion: Decision support tools provide benefits for caregivers/patients undergoing the difficult task of deciding about feeding methods. Findings suggest that the current quality of decision-making is inadequate.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-98232018000200232
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1809-98232018000200232
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981-22562018021.170169
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado do Rio Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia v.21 n.2 2018
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
instname:Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron:UFRJ
instname_str Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
instacron_str UFRJ
institution UFRJ
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
collection Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (UERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistabgg@gmail.com
_version_ 1750128436663287808