FOUCAULT AND BOURDIEU: TO EACH HIS OWN NEOLIBERALISM?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Laval,Christian
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Sociologia & Antropologia
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2238-38752017000100063
Resumo: Abstract The article sets out to compare the approaches of Michel Foucault and Pierre Bourdieu to neoliberalism. Rather than take their theorizations to be mutually antithetical, whether at a theoretical or a political level, here the aim is to compare and contrast the two authors through the following lines of analysis: moments of production, styles of theorization, critical strategies and fundamental intellectual reference points. The conclusion proposes a number of intersections and paths towards potential articulations between the two approaches, as well as a reflection on the place of the intellectual in the contemporary social sciences and philosophy.
id UFRJ-18_03e71be227f5a6fb0e2bd509b04263c7
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2238-38752017000100063
network_acronym_str UFRJ-18
network_name_str Sociologia & Antropologia
repository_id_str
spelling FOUCAULT AND BOURDIEU: TO EACH HIS OWN NEOLIBERALISM?NeoliberalismoMichel FoucaultPierre BourdieuFrench intellectual fieldsocial theoryAbstract The article sets out to compare the approaches of Michel Foucault and Pierre Bourdieu to neoliberalism. Rather than take their theorizations to be mutually antithetical, whether at a theoretical or a political level, here the aim is to compare and contrast the two authors through the following lines of analysis: moments of production, styles of theorization, critical strategies and fundamental intellectual reference points. The conclusion proposes a number of intersections and paths towards potential articulations between the two approaches, as well as a reflection on the place of the intellectual in the contemporary social sciences and philosophy.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro2017-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2238-38752017000100063Sociologia & Antropologia v.7 n.1 2017reponame:Sociologia & Antropologiainstname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/2238-38752017v713info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLaval,Christianeng2017-06-08T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2238-38752017000100063Revistahttp://www.revistappgsa.ifcs.ufrj.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistappgsa@gmail.com2238-38752236-7527opendoar:2017-06-08T00:00Sociologia & Antropologia - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv FOUCAULT AND BOURDIEU: TO EACH HIS OWN NEOLIBERALISM?
title FOUCAULT AND BOURDIEU: TO EACH HIS OWN NEOLIBERALISM?
spellingShingle FOUCAULT AND BOURDIEU: TO EACH HIS OWN NEOLIBERALISM?
Laval,Christian
Neoliberalismo
Michel Foucault
Pierre Bourdieu
French intellectual field
social theory
title_short FOUCAULT AND BOURDIEU: TO EACH HIS OWN NEOLIBERALISM?
title_full FOUCAULT AND BOURDIEU: TO EACH HIS OWN NEOLIBERALISM?
title_fullStr FOUCAULT AND BOURDIEU: TO EACH HIS OWN NEOLIBERALISM?
title_full_unstemmed FOUCAULT AND BOURDIEU: TO EACH HIS OWN NEOLIBERALISM?
title_sort FOUCAULT AND BOURDIEU: TO EACH HIS OWN NEOLIBERALISM?
author Laval,Christian
author_facet Laval,Christian
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Laval,Christian
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Neoliberalismo
Michel Foucault
Pierre Bourdieu
French intellectual field
social theory
topic Neoliberalismo
Michel Foucault
Pierre Bourdieu
French intellectual field
social theory
description Abstract The article sets out to compare the approaches of Michel Foucault and Pierre Bourdieu to neoliberalism. Rather than take their theorizations to be mutually antithetical, whether at a theoretical or a political level, here the aim is to compare and contrast the two authors through the following lines of analysis: moments of production, styles of theorization, critical strategies and fundamental intellectual reference points. The conclusion proposes a number of intersections and paths towards potential articulations between the two approaches, as well as a reflection on the place of the intellectual in the contemporary social sciences and philosophy.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2238-38752017000100063
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2238-38752017000100063
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2238-38752017v713
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociologia & Antropologia v.7 n.1 2017
reponame:Sociologia & Antropologia
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron:UFRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron_str UFRJ
institution UFRJ
reponame_str Sociologia & Antropologia
collection Sociologia & Antropologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociologia & Antropologia - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistappgsa@gmail.com
_version_ 1754734732802785280

Registros relacionados