THE BIPOLARITY OF DEMOCRACY AND AUTHORITARIANISM: VALUE PATTERNS, INCLUSION ROLES AND FORMS OF INTERNAL DIFFERENTIATION OF POLITICAL SYSTEMS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ahlers,Anna L.
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Stichweh,Rudolf
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Sociologia & Antropologia
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2238-38752019000300819
Resumo: Abstract The paper begins with the observation that today’s world society exhibits a political regime bipolarity and suggests an interpretation, based on the sociological theories of inclusion and functional differentiation. We (1) distinguish democratic and authoritarian political regimes by identifying the different value patterns underlying collectively binding decision making. Democracy is understood as a political regime based on the ‘autopoiesis’ of its constitutive values, while in authoritarian regimes we observe a ‘heterogenesis’ of values. To this we (2) add the idea that modern states are characterized by the imperative of individual political inclusion. At the same time new patterns arise for the inclusion of collectivities. Concluding (3), we postulate that this approach allows the study of ongoing transformations of differentiation in both types of regimes. In this part, we present an overview of the hierarchy of levels of modern polities and the horizontal differentiation of subsystems and organizations.
id UFRJ-18_6eaf1847997efa6ec0b4d29bbe9a3ccb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2238-38752019000300819
network_acronym_str UFRJ-18
network_name_str Sociologia & Antropologia
repository_id_str
spelling THE BIPOLARITY OF DEMOCRACY AND AUTHORITARIANISM: VALUE PATTERNS, INCLUSION ROLES AND FORMS OF INTERNAL DIFFERENTIATION OF POLITICAL SYSTEMSDemocracyauthoritarianisminclusionsocietal valuesinternal differentiationAbstract The paper begins with the observation that today’s world society exhibits a political regime bipolarity and suggests an interpretation, based on the sociological theories of inclusion and functional differentiation. We (1) distinguish democratic and authoritarian political regimes by identifying the different value patterns underlying collectively binding decision making. Democracy is understood as a political regime based on the ‘autopoiesis’ of its constitutive values, while in authoritarian regimes we observe a ‘heterogenesis’ of values. To this we (2) add the idea that modern states are characterized by the imperative of individual political inclusion. At the same time new patterns arise for the inclusion of collectivities. Concluding (3), we postulate that this approach allows the study of ongoing transformations of differentiation in both types of regimes. In this part, we present an overview of the hierarchy of levels of modern polities and the horizontal differentiation of subsystems and organizations.Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro2019-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2238-38752019000300819Sociologia & Antropologia v.9 n.3 2019reponame:Sociologia & Antropologiainstname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/2238-38752019v935info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAhlers,Anna L.Stichweh,Rudolfeng2019-12-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2238-38752019000300819Revistahttp://www.revistappgsa.ifcs.ufrj.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistappgsa@gmail.com2238-38752236-7527opendoar:2019-12-11T00:00Sociologia & Antropologia - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv THE BIPOLARITY OF DEMOCRACY AND AUTHORITARIANISM: VALUE PATTERNS, INCLUSION ROLES AND FORMS OF INTERNAL DIFFERENTIATION OF POLITICAL SYSTEMS
title THE BIPOLARITY OF DEMOCRACY AND AUTHORITARIANISM: VALUE PATTERNS, INCLUSION ROLES AND FORMS OF INTERNAL DIFFERENTIATION OF POLITICAL SYSTEMS
spellingShingle THE BIPOLARITY OF DEMOCRACY AND AUTHORITARIANISM: VALUE PATTERNS, INCLUSION ROLES AND FORMS OF INTERNAL DIFFERENTIATION OF POLITICAL SYSTEMS
Ahlers,Anna L.
Democracy
authoritarianism
inclusion
societal values
internal differentiation
title_short THE BIPOLARITY OF DEMOCRACY AND AUTHORITARIANISM: VALUE PATTERNS, INCLUSION ROLES AND FORMS OF INTERNAL DIFFERENTIATION OF POLITICAL SYSTEMS
title_full THE BIPOLARITY OF DEMOCRACY AND AUTHORITARIANISM: VALUE PATTERNS, INCLUSION ROLES AND FORMS OF INTERNAL DIFFERENTIATION OF POLITICAL SYSTEMS
title_fullStr THE BIPOLARITY OF DEMOCRACY AND AUTHORITARIANISM: VALUE PATTERNS, INCLUSION ROLES AND FORMS OF INTERNAL DIFFERENTIATION OF POLITICAL SYSTEMS
title_full_unstemmed THE BIPOLARITY OF DEMOCRACY AND AUTHORITARIANISM: VALUE PATTERNS, INCLUSION ROLES AND FORMS OF INTERNAL DIFFERENTIATION OF POLITICAL SYSTEMS
title_sort THE BIPOLARITY OF DEMOCRACY AND AUTHORITARIANISM: VALUE PATTERNS, INCLUSION ROLES AND FORMS OF INTERNAL DIFFERENTIATION OF POLITICAL SYSTEMS
author Ahlers,Anna L.
author_facet Ahlers,Anna L.
Stichweh,Rudolf
author_role author
author2 Stichweh,Rudolf
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ahlers,Anna L.
Stichweh,Rudolf
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Democracy
authoritarianism
inclusion
societal values
internal differentiation
topic Democracy
authoritarianism
inclusion
societal values
internal differentiation
description Abstract The paper begins with the observation that today’s world society exhibits a political regime bipolarity and suggests an interpretation, based on the sociological theories of inclusion and functional differentiation. We (1) distinguish democratic and authoritarian political regimes by identifying the different value patterns underlying collectively binding decision making. Democracy is understood as a political regime based on the ‘autopoiesis’ of its constitutive values, while in authoritarian regimes we observe a ‘heterogenesis’ of values. To this we (2) add the idea that modern states are characterized by the imperative of individual political inclusion. At the same time new patterns arise for the inclusion of collectivities. Concluding (3), we postulate that this approach allows the study of ongoing transformations of differentiation in both types of regimes. In this part, we present an overview of the hierarchy of levels of modern polities and the horizontal differentiation of subsystems and organizations.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2238-38752019000300819
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2238-38752019000300819
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2238-38752019v935
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Sociologia & Antropologia v.9 n.3 2019
reponame:Sociologia & Antropologia
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron:UFRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron_str UFRJ
institution UFRJ
reponame_str Sociologia & Antropologia
collection Sociologia & Antropologia
repository.name.fl_str_mv Sociologia & Antropologia - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistappgsa@gmail.com
_version_ 1754734733210681344