Use of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Classification of Forest Species

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Loiola, Táscilla Magalhães
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Fantinel, Roberta Aparecida, dos Santos, Fernanda Dias, de Bastos, Franciele, Schuh, Mateus Sabadi, Fernandes, Pablo, Simões, Bruna Andiele, Pereira, Rudiney Soares
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/50490
Resumo: Optimization in the process of managing forest resources seeks alternatives that make data collection possible. One of them alternatives is spectroradiometry, which consists of measuring the spectral response, having as product the response of the target in relation to the incident radiation along the electromagnetic spectrum, and that, using machine learning, with pre-selected models, makes it possible to identify. Given the above, the study aimed to use machine learning algorithms to classify species by vegetation indices from reflectance data. The study was developed at the Federal University from Santa Maria, working with the species Ficus benjamina, Inga marginata, Handroanthus chrysotrichus, Psidium cattleianum, Salix humboldtiana, Corymbia citriodora and Myrcianthes pungens, and spectral readings of the leaves were taken using the FieldSpec®3 spectroradiometer connected to RTS-3ZC3 integrating  sphere. The reflectance values with wavelength ranged in amplitude from 350 ƞm to 2,500 ƞm and spectral resolution of 1 ƞm. Vegetation indices were calculated using the software R Studio, being: NDVI, SAVI, RVI, GNDVI, NDWI, NDWI2, GEMI, DVI, TVI, RVI, MSAVI, WDVI. The algorithms used to develop machine learning were: Random Forest (RF), k-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN), Naive Bayes (NB) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). RF proves to be the most appropriate for data validation, with 85% global accuracy, followed by SVM, with 71%, K-NN with 64% and NB with 35%. The indices with the best performance to point the species were NDWI and SAVI. 
id UFRJ-21_22676c49fc77135c2d6052491010c6f3
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/50490
network_acronym_str UFRJ-21
network_name_str Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Use of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Classification of Forest SpeciesRemote sensingSpectroradiometryVegetation indicesOptimization in the process of managing forest resources seeks alternatives that make data collection possible. One of them alternatives is spectroradiometry, which consists of measuring the spectral response, having as product the response of the target in relation to the incident radiation along the electromagnetic spectrum, and that, using machine learning, with pre-selected models, makes it possible to identify. Given the above, the study aimed to use machine learning algorithms to classify species by vegetation indices from reflectance data. The study was developed at the Federal University from Santa Maria, working with the species Ficus benjamina, Inga marginata, Handroanthus chrysotrichus, Psidium cattleianum, Salix humboldtiana, Corymbia citriodora and Myrcianthes pungens, and spectral readings of the leaves were taken using the FieldSpec®3 spectroradiometer connected to RTS-3ZC3 integrating  sphere. The reflectance values with wavelength ranged in amplitude from 350 ƞm to 2,500 ƞm and spectral resolution of 1 ƞm. Vegetation indices were calculated using the software R Studio, being: NDVI, SAVI, RVI, GNDVI, NDWI, NDWI2, GEMI, DVI, TVI, RVI, MSAVI, WDVI. The algorithms used to develop machine learning were: Random Forest (RF), k-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN), Naive Bayes (NB) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). RF proves to be the most appropriate for data validation, with 85% global accuracy, followed by SVM, with 71%, K-NN with 64% and NB with 35%. The indices with the best performance to point the species were NDWI and SAVI. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro2023-03-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/5049010.11137/1982-3908_2023_46_50490Anuário do Instituto de Geociências; v. 46 (2023)Anuário do Instituto de Geociências; Vol. 46 (2023)1982-39080101-9759reponame:Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJenghttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/50490/pdfCopyright (c) 2023 Anuário do Instituto de Geociênciasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLoiola, Táscilla MagalhãesFantinel, Roberta Aparecidados Santos, Fernanda Diasde Bastos, FrancieleSchuh, Mateus SabadiFernandes, PabloSimões, Bruna AndielePereira, Rudiney Soares2023-03-08T13:39:10Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/50490Revistahttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/oaianuario@igeo.ufrj.br||1982-39080101-9759opendoar:2023-03-08T13:39:10Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Use of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Classification of Forest Species
title Use of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Classification of Forest Species
spellingShingle Use of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Classification of Forest Species
Loiola, Táscilla Magalhães
Remote sensing
Spectroradiometry
Vegetation indices
title_short Use of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Classification of Forest Species
title_full Use of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Classification of Forest Species
title_fullStr Use of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Classification of Forest Species
title_full_unstemmed Use of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Classification of Forest Species
title_sort Use of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Classification of Forest Species
author Loiola, Táscilla Magalhães
author_facet Loiola, Táscilla Magalhães
Fantinel, Roberta Aparecida
dos Santos, Fernanda Dias
de Bastos, Franciele
Schuh, Mateus Sabadi
Fernandes, Pablo
Simões, Bruna Andiele
Pereira, Rudiney Soares
author_role author
author2 Fantinel, Roberta Aparecida
dos Santos, Fernanda Dias
de Bastos, Franciele
Schuh, Mateus Sabadi
Fernandes, Pablo
Simões, Bruna Andiele
Pereira, Rudiney Soares
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Loiola, Táscilla Magalhães
Fantinel, Roberta Aparecida
dos Santos, Fernanda Dias
de Bastos, Franciele
Schuh, Mateus Sabadi
Fernandes, Pablo
Simões, Bruna Andiele
Pereira, Rudiney Soares
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Remote sensing
Spectroradiometry
Vegetation indices
topic Remote sensing
Spectroradiometry
Vegetation indices
description Optimization in the process of managing forest resources seeks alternatives that make data collection possible. One of them alternatives is spectroradiometry, which consists of measuring the spectral response, having as product the response of the target in relation to the incident radiation along the electromagnetic spectrum, and that, using machine learning, with pre-selected models, makes it possible to identify. Given the above, the study aimed to use machine learning algorithms to classify species by vegetation indices from reflectance data. The study was developed at the Federal University from Santa Maria, working with the species Ficus benjamina, Inga marginata, Handroanthus chrysotrichus, Psidium cattleianum, Salix humboldtiana, Corymbia citriodora and Myrcianthes pungens, and spectral readings of the leaves were taken using the FieldSpec®3 spectroradiometer connected to RTS-3ZC3 integrating  sphere. The reflectance values with wavelength ranged in amplitude from 350 ƞm to 2,500 ƞm and spectral resolution of 1 ƞm. Vegetation indices were calculated using the software R Studio, being: NDVI, SAVI, RVI, GNDVI, NDWI, NDWI2, GEMI, DVI, TVI, RVI, MSAVI, WDVI. The algorithms used to develop machine learning were: Random Forest (RF), k-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN), Naive Bayes (NB) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). RF proves to be the most appropriate for data validation, with 85% global accuracy, followed by SVM, with 71%, K-NN with 64% and NB with 35%. The indices with the best performance to point the species were NDWI and SAVI. 
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-03-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/50490
10.11137/1982-3908_2023_46_50490
url https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/50490
identifier_str_mv 10.11137/1982-3908_2023_46_50490
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/aigeo/article/view/50490/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Anuário do Instituto de Geociências
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Anuário do Instituto de Geociências
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Anuário do Instituto de Geociências; v. 46 (2023)
Anuário do Instituto de Geociências; Vol. 46 (2023)
1982-3908
0101-9759
reponame:Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron:UFRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron_str UFRJ
institution UFRJ
reponame_str Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)
collection Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Anuário do Instituto de Geociências (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv anuario@igeo.ufrj.br||
_version_ 1797053535696715776