War Algorithms in Modern Deliberative Democracies: Parliamentary Technology Assessment as a Public Conscience Discovery Tool?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kowalczewska, Kaja
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Kijewska, Barbara
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/article/view/50767
Resumo: This paper is focused on the intersection of public international law and parliamentary assessment of technologies in the context of discussions on the lethal applications of artificial intelligence. The authors discuss the ‘public conscience requirements’ of the Martens clause as an opportunity to increase the legitimacy of international law by including qualified public opinion in the international law-making process. This is particularly important in the case of controversial technologies such as lethal autonomous weapons systems, which have a fundamental impact on warfare and the application of which comes with both unprecedented benefits and as well as risks for humankind. The authors advocate the actual use of the Parliamentary Technology Assessment (PTA) mechanism as a method based on democratic deliberation and participation, which – especially in times of disinformation and fake news – can provide a reliable source of information and sights for both policy makers as well as the general public. PTA can be also seen as an institutionalised channel allowing civil society to exercise oversight over disruptive military technologies.
id UFRJ-22_939e782cf8982d9e025dcc9167ea6892
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/50767
network_acronym_str UFRJ-22
network_name_str Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea
repository_id_str
spelling War Algorithms in Modern Deliberative Democracies: Parliamentary Technology Assessment as a Public Conscience Discovery Tool?lethal autonomous weapon systemspublic consciencequalified public opinionparliamentary technology assessmentThis paper is focused on the intersection of public international law and parliamentary assessment of technologies in the context of discussions on the lethal applications of artificial intelligence. The authors discuss the ‘public conscience requirements’ of the Martens clause as an opportunity to increase the legitimacy of international law by including qualified public opinion in the international law-making process. This is particularly important in the case of controversial technologies such as lethal autonomous weapons systems, which have a fundamental impact on warfare and the application of which comes with both unprecedented benefits and as well as risks for humankind. The authors advocate the actual use of the Parliamentary Technology Assessment (PTA) mechanism as a method based on democratic deliberation and participation, which – especially in times of disinformation and fake news – can provide a reliable source of information and sights for both policy makers as well as the general public. PTA can be also seen as an institutionalised channel allowing civil society to exercise oversight over disruptive military technologies.Programa de Posgrado en Derecho de la Universidad Federal de Rio de Janeiro2022-06-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/article/view/5076710.21875/tjc.v7i0.50767Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea; v. 7 (2022)Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea; Vol. 7 (2022)Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea; Vol. 7 (2022)2526-046410.21875/tjc.v7i0reponame:Teoria Jurídica Contemporâneainstname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJenghttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/article/view/50767/28924Copyright (c) 2022 Kaja Kowalczewska, Barbara Kijewskainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessKowalczewska, KajaKijewska, Barbara2024-04-09T13:05:43Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/50767Revistahttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/indexPUBhttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/oaitjc.ppgd.ufrj@gmail.com || rodrigocarelli@direito.ufrj.br || maysasdeandrade@gmail.com2526-04642526-0464opendoar:2024-04-09T13:05:43Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv War Algorithms in Modern Deliberative Democracies: Parliamentary Technology Assessment as a Public Conscience Discovery Tool?
title War Algorithms in Modern Deliberative Democracies: Parliamentary Technology Assessment as a Public Conscience Discovery Tool?
spellingShingle War Algorithms in Modern Deliberative Democracies: Parliamentary Technology Assessment as a Public Conscience Discovery Tool?
Kowalczewska, Kaja
lethal autonomous weapon systems
public conscience
qualified public opinion
parliamentary technology assessment
title_short War Algorithms in Modern Deliberative Democracies: Parliamentary Technology Assessment as a Public Conscience Discovery Tool?
title_full War Algorithms in Modern Deliberative Democracies: Parliamentary Technology Assessment as a Public Conscience Discovery Tool?
title_fullStr War Algorithms in Modern Deliberative Democracies: Parliamentary Technology Assessment as a Public Conscience Discovery Tool?
title_full_unstemmed War Algorithms in Modern Deliberative Democracies: Parliamentary Technology Assessment as a Public Conscience Discovery Tool?
title_sort War Algorithms in Modern Deliberative Democracies: Parliamentary Technology Assessment as a Public Conscience Discovery Tool?
author Kowalczewska, Kaja
author_facet Kowalczewska, Kaja
Kijewska, Barbara
author_role author
author2 Kijewska, Barbara
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kowalczewska, Kaja
Kijewska, Barbara
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv lethal autonomous weapon systems
public conscience
qualified public opinion
parliamentary technology assessment
topic lethal autonomous weapon systems
public conscience
qualified public opinion
parliamentary technology assessment
description This paper is focused on the intersection of public international law and parliamentary assessment of technologies in the context of discussions on the lethal applications of artificial intelligence. The authors discuss the ‘public conscience requirements’ of the Martens clause as an opportunity to increase the legitimacy of international law by including qualified public opinion in the international law-making process. This is particularly important in the case of controversial technologies such as lethal autonomous weapons systems, which have a fundamental impact on warfare and the application of which comes with both unprecedented benefits and as well as risks for humankind. The authors advocate the actual use of the Parliamentary Technology Assessment (PTA) mechanism as a method based on democratic deliberation and participation, which – especially in times of disinformation and fake news – can provide a reliable source of information and sights for both policy makers as well as the general public. PTA can be also seen as an institutionalised channel allowing civil society to exercise oversight over disruptive military technologies.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-06-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/article/view/50767
10.21875/tjc.v7i0.50767
url https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/article/view/50767
identifier_str_mv 10.21875/tjc.v7i0.50767
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rjur/article/view/50767/28924
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Kaja Kowalczewska, Barbara Kijewska
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Kaja Kowalczewska, Barbara Kijewska
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Posgrado en Derecho de la Universidad Federal de Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Programa de Posgrado en Derecho de la Universidad Federal de Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea; v. 7 (2022)
Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea; Vol. 7 (2022)
Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea; Vol. 7 (2022)
2526-0464
10.21875/tjc.v7i0
reponame:Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron:UFRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron_str UFRJ
institution UFRJ
reponame_str Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea
collection Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea
repository.name.fl_str_mv Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv tjc.ppgd.ufrj@gmail.com || rodrigocarelli@direito.ufrj.br || maysasdeandrade@gmail.com
_version_ 1797042347580588032