New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2019 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rec/article/view/23168 |
Resumo: | Rents in the U.S. economy now constitute a significant and growing fraction of national income. In effect, the post-industrial U.S. is becoming more like Saudi Arabia as these new rents arise in very concentrated form. Thus, policy is now obliged to focus more on distribution rather than the traditional emphasis on production and efficiency. The expanding impacts of trade and technology now combine with the increased production of ‘knowledge goods’ to sharply increase income inequality. The paper argues that the root cause of the inequality surge is the proliferation of new rents in sharp contrast to the Piketty’s focus on capital accumulation in a neoclassical context. Once rents exceed a certain threshold (share of national income), then it is no longer permissible to maintain the neoclassical presumption that it can be neglected. Then the policy implications are completely revered – even revolutionary – with regard to the stance on redistributions, higher education, incentives and capital taxation, etc. |
id |
UFRJ-2_36291b919610eef824d238acacb210a1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23168 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRJ-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Economia Contemporânea |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st CenturyKasliwal, PariUS rents economyincome distributionD24D31O51P16P17Rents in the U.S. economy now constitute a significant and growing fraction of national income. In effect, the post-industrial U.S. is becoming more like Saudi Arabia as these new rents arise in very concentrated form. Thus, policy is now obliged to focus more on distribution rather than the traditional emphasis on production and efficiency. The expanding impacts of trade and technology now combine with the increased production of ‘knowledge goods’ to sharply increase income inequality. The paper argues that the root cause of the inequality surge is the proliferation of new rents in sharp contrast to the Piketty’s focus on capital accumulation in a neoclassical context. Once rents exceed a certain threshold (share of national income), then it is no longer permissible to maintain the neoclassical presumption that it can be neglected. Then the policy implications are completely revered – even revolutionary – with regard to the stance on redistributions, higher education, incentives and capital taxation, etc.IE-UFRJ2019-02-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Pareshttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rec/article/view/23168Revista de Economia Contemporânea; Rev. Econ. Contemp., v. 20, n. 3, set./dez. 2016Journal of Contemporary Economics; Rev. Econ. Contemp., v. 20, n. 3, set./dez. 20161980-5527enCopyright (c) 2019 Pari Kasliwaloai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/231682023-11-24T15:17:21Z |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century |
title |
New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century |
spellingShingle |
New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century Kasliwal, Pari US rents economy income distribution D24 D31 O51 P16 P17 |
title_short |
New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century |
title_full |
New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century |
title_fullStr |
New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century |
title_full_unstemmed |
New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century |
title_sort |
New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Kasliwal, Pari |
author |
Kasliwal, Pari |
author_facet |
Kasliwal, Pari |
author_role |
author |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
US rents economy income distribution D24 D31 O51 P16 P17 |
topic |
US rents economy income distribution D24 D31 O51 P16 P17 |
description |
Rents in the U.S. economy now constitute a significant and growing fraction of national income. In effect, the post-industrial U.S. is becoming more like Saudi Arabia as these new rents arise in very concentrated form. Thus, policy is now obliged to focus more on distribution rather than the traditional emphasis on production and efficiency. The expanding impacts of trade and technology now combine with the increased production of ‘knowledge goods’ to sharply increase income inequality. The paper argues that the root cause of the inequality surge is the proliferation of new rents in sharp contrast to the Piketty’s focus on capital accumulation in a neoclassical context. Once rents exceed a certain threshold (share of national income), then it is no longer permissible to maintain the neoclassical presumption that it can be neglected. Then the policy implications are completely revered – even revolutionary – with regard to the stance on redistributions, higher education, incentives and capital taxation, etc. |
publishDate |
2019 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2019-02-08 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rec/article/view/23168 |
url |
https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rec/article/view/23168 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
en |
language_invalid_str_mv |
en |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Pari Kasliwal |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2019 Pari Kasliwal |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IE-UFRJ |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IE-UFRJ |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Economia Contemporânea; Rev. Econ. Contemp., v. 20, n. 3, set./dez. 2016 Journal of Contemporary Economics; Rev. Econ. Contemp., v. 20, n. 3, set./dez. 2016 1980-5527 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1789436682361110528 |