New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Kasliwal, Pari
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Texto Completo: https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rec/article/view/23168
Resumo: Rents in the U.S. economy now constitute a significant and growing fraction of national income. In effect, the post-industrial U.S. is becoming more like Saudi Arabia as these new rents arise in very concentrated form. Thus, policy is now obliged to focus more on distribution rather than the traditional emphasis on production and efficiency. The expanding impacts of trade and technology now combine with the increased production of ‘knowledge goods’ to sharply increase income inequality. The paper argues that the root cause of the inequality surge is the proliferation of new rents in sharp contrast to the Piketty’s focus on capital accumulation in a neoclassical context. Once rents exceed a certain threshold (share of national income), then it is no longer permissible to maintain the neoclassical presumption that it can be neglected. Then the policy implications are completely revered – even revolutionary – with regard to the stance on redistributions, higher education, incentives and capital taxation, etc.
id UFRJ-2_36291b919610eef824d238acacb210a1
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/23168
network_acronym_str UFRJ-2
network_name_str Revista de Economia Contemporânea
repository_id_str
spelling New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st CenturyKasliwal, PariUS rents economyincome distributionD24D31O51P16P17Rents in the U.S. economy now constitute a significant and growing fraction of national income. In effect, the post-industrial U.S. is becoming more like Saudi Arabia as these new rents arise in very concentrated form. Thus, policy is now obliged to focus more on distribution rather than the traditional emphasis on production and efficiency. The expanding impacts of trade and technology now combine with the increased production of ‘knowledge goods’ to sharply increase income inequality. The paper argues that the root cause of the inequality surge is the proliferation of new rents in sharp contrast to the Piketty’s focus on capital accumulation in a neoclassical context. Once rents exceed a certain threshold (share of national income), then it is no longer permissible to maintain the neoclassical presumption that it can be neglected. Then the policy implications are completely revered – even revolutionary – with regard to the stance on redistributions, higher education, incentives and capital taxation, etc.IE-UFRJ2019-02-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Pareshttps://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rec/article/view/23168Revista de Economia Contemporânea; Rev. Econ. Contemp., v. 20, n. 3, set./dez. 2016Journal of Contemporary Economics; Rev. Econ. Contemp., v. 20, n. 3, set./dez. 20161980-5527enCopyright (c) 2019 Pari Kasliwaloai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/231682023-11-24T15:17:21Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century
title New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century
spellingShingle New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century
Kasliwal, Pari
US rents economy
income distribution
D24
D31
O51
P16
P17
title_short New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century
title_full New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century
title_fullStr New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century
title_full_unstemmed New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century
title_sort New rents economy – U.S. inequality in the 21st Century
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Kasliwal, Pari
author Kasliwal, Pari
author_facet Kasliwal, Pari
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv US rents economy
income distribution
D24
D31
O51
P16
P17
topic US rents economy
income distribution
D24
D31
O51
P16
P17
description Rents in the U.S. economy now constitute a significant and growing fraction of national income. In effect, the post-industrial U.S. is becoming more like Saudi Arabia as these new rents arise in very concentrated form. Thus, policy is now obliged to focus more on distribution rather than the traditional emphasis on production and efficiency. The expanding impacts of trade and technology now combine with the increased production of ‘knowledge goods’ to sharply increase income inequality. The paper argues that the root cause of the inequality surge is the proliferation of new rents in sharp contrast to the Piketty’s focus on capital accumulation in a neoclassical context. Once rents exceed a certain threshold (share of national income), then it is no longer permissible to maintain the neoclassical presumption that it can be neglected. Then the policy implications are completely revered – even revolutionary – with regard to the stance on redistributions, higher education, incentives and capital taxation, etc.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-02-08
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rec/article/view/23168
url https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/rec/article/view/23168
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv en
language_invalid_str_mv en
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Pari Kasliwal
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Pari Kasliwal
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IE-UFRJ
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IE-UFRJ
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Economia Contemporânea; Rev. Econ. Contemp., v. 20, n. 3, set./dez. 2016
Journal of Contemporary Economics; Rev. Econ. Contemp., v. 20, n. 3, set./dez. 2016
1980-5527
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1789436682361110528