Restoring Ecological Functions Using Agroforestry Systems in Riparian Forests

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Viégas,Lucas Bertacini
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Silva,José Mauro Santana da, Pala,Marcio de Camargo, Piña-Rodrigues,Fatima Conceição Márquez
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Floresta e Ambiente
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872019000400132
Resumo: ABSTRACT Agroforestry systems and restoration models were compared with native forests by examining the restoration of ecological processes that generate stability, resilience and reliability. The stability assessment was obtained using indicators of diversity, structure and functionality. Indicators of soil protection and nutrient cycling were also used to estimate the resilience. The reliability was assessed by management and protection indicators, anthropic impact and canopy (percentage of light). Agroforestry systems did not promote the restoration of ecological functions due mainly to structural factors than management. The production of biomass and carbon storage were higher in the agroforestry system considering the association of trees with short cycle crops (3.2 t ha-1 yr-1; 39.81 t C ha-1) than trees with green manure system (2.4 ha-1 yr-1; 34.09 t C ha-1). After 36 months, the restoration methods and agroforestry systems did not provide resilience and stability for the riparian forests protection.
id UFRJ-3_3096715c88845f104b982d6183c4d0cb
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2179-80872019000400132
network_acronym_str UFRJ-3
network_name_str Floresta e Ambiente
repository_id_str
spelling Restoring Ecological Functions Using Agroforestry Systems in Riparian Forestsecological indicatorsadaptive managementcarbon sequestrationABSTRACT Agroforestry systems and restoration models were compared with native forests by examining the restoration of ecological processes that generate stability, resilience and reliability. The stability assessment was obtained using indicators of diversity, structure and functionality. Indicators of soil protection and nutrient cycling were also used to estimate the resilience. The reliability was assessed by management and protection indicators, anthropic impact and canopy (percentage of light). Agroforestry systems did not promote the restoration of ecological functions due mainly to structural factors than management. The production of biomass and carbon storage were higher in the agroforestry system considering the association of trees with short cycle crops (3.2 t ha-1 yr-1; 39.81 t C ha-1) than trees with green manure system (2.4 ha-1 yr-1; 34.09 t C ha-1). After 36 months, the restoration methods and agroforestry systems did not provide resilience and stability for the riparian forests protection.Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872019000400132Floresta e Ambiente v.26 n.4 2019reponame:Floresta e Ambienteinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/2179-8087.083017info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessViégas,Lucas BertaciniSilva,José Mauro Santana daPala,Marcio de CamargoPiña-Rodrigues,Fatima Conceição Márquezeng2019-09-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2179-80872019000400132Revistahttps://www.floram.org/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpfloramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br||2179-80871415-0980opendoar:2019-09-03T00:00Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Restoring Ecological Functions Using Agroforestry Systems in Riparian Forests
title Restoring Ecological Functions Using Agroforestry Systems in Riparian Forests
spellingShingle Restoring Ecological Functions Using Agroforestry Systems in Riparian Forests
Viégas,Lucas Bertacini
ecological indicators
adaptive management
carbon sequestration
title_short Restoring Ecological Functions Using Agroforestry Systems in Riparian Forests
title_full Restoring Ecological Functions Using Agroforestry Systems in Riparian Forests
title_fullStr Restoring Ecological Functions Using Agroforestry Systems in Riparian Forests
title_full_unstemmed Restoring Ecological Functions Using Agroforestry Systems in Riparian Forests
title_sort Restoring Ecological Functions Using Agroforestry Systems in Riparian Forests
author Viégas,Lucas Bertacini
author_facet Viégas,Lucas Bertacini
Silva,José Mauro Santana da
Pala,Marcio de Camargo
Piña-Rodrigues,Fatima Conceição Márquez
author_role author
author2 Silva,José Mauro Santana da
Pala,Marcio de Camargo
Piña-Rodrigues,Fatima Conceição Márquez
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Viégas,Lucas Bertacini
Silva,José Mauro Santana da
Pala,Marcio de Camargo
Piña-Rodrigues,Fatima Conceição Márquez
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ecological indicators
adaptive management
carbon sequestration
topic ecological indicators
adaptive management
carbon sequestration
description ABSTRACT Agroforestry systems and restoration models were compared with native forests by examining the restoration of ecological processes that generate stability, resilience and reliability. The stability assessment was obtained using indicators of diversity, structure and functionality. Indicators of soil protection and nutrient cycling were also used to estimate the resilience. The reliability was assessed by management and protection indicators, anthropic impact and canopy (percentage of light). Agroforestry systems did not promote the restoration of ecological functions due mainly to structural factors than management. The production of biomass and carbon storage were higher in the agroforestry system considering the association of trees with short cycle crops (3.2 t ha-1 yr-1; 39.81 t C ha-1) than trees with green manure system (2.4 ha-1 yr-1; 34.09 t C ha-1). After 36 months, the restoration methods and agroforestry systems did not provide resilience and stability for the riparian forests protection.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872019000400132
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872019000400132
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2179-8087.083017
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Floresta e Ambiente v.26 n.4 2019
reponame:Floresta e Ambiente
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron:UFRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron_str UFRJ
institution UFRJ
reponame_str Floresta e Ambiente
collection Floresta e Ambiente
repository.name.fl_str_mv Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv floramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br||
_version_ 1750128142917304320

Registros relacionados