Litterfall and Nutrient Input in a Degraded Area
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Floresta e Ambiente |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872017000100136 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT This study aimed to test the effects of fertilization with organic compost from industrial production of pulp on the litterfall and nutrient input of monospecific plantations in a loan area. The treatments consisted of three doses of the organic compost D10, D15 and D20 (10, 15 and 20 Mg ha-1, respectively), mineral conventional fertilization (DAM) and no fertilization (D0) in land plots (N = 4/treatment/species; 15 x 12 m). Litterfall was monthly collected by two traps (0.72 m2/plot) and sorted out into leaves, twigs, seeds, flowers, fruits and others. We determined the input of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium. There were no differences among the treatments and between species in terms of total annual litterfall. The higher nutrient input was obtained by DAM, followed by D10, in both plantations. The annual nutrient input was higher for the litterfall on the E. urograndis plantation. |
id |
UFRJ-3_3f62b0e432fe9e9ab24cc260f586a8fe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2179-80872017000100136 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRJ-3 |
network_name_str |
Floresta e Ambiente |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Litterfall and Nutrient Input in a Degraded AreaEucalyptus urograndisMabea fistuliferanutrient cyclingABSTRACT This study aimed to test the effects of fertilization with organic compost from industrial production of pulp on the litterfall and nutrient input of monospecific plantations in a loan area. The treatments consisted of three doses of the organic compost D10, D15 and D20 (10, 15 and 20 Mg ha-1, respectively), mineral conventional fertilization (DAM) and no fertilization (D0) in land plots (N = 4/treatment/species; 15 x 12 m). Litterfall was monthly collected by two traps (0.72 m2/plot) and sorted out into leaves, twigs, seeds, flowers, fruits and others. We determined the input of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium. There were no differences among the treatments and between species in terms of total annual litterfall. The higher nutrient input was obtained by DAM, followed by D10, in both plantations. The annual nutrient input was higher for the litterfall on the E. urograndis plantation.Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872017000100136Floresta e Ambiente v.24 2017reponame:Floresta e Ambienteinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/2179-8087.002816info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGiácomo,Rômulo GuimarãesAlves,Marlene CristinaCamara,RodrigoPereira,Marcos GervasioArruda,Otton Garcia deSouto,Sebastião NilceMoraes,Mário Luis Teixeira deeng2017-04-24T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2179-80872017000100136Revistahttps://www.floram.org/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpfloramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br||2179-80871415-0980opendoar:2017-04-24T00:00Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Litterfall and Nutrient Input in a Degraded Area |
title |
Litterfall and Nutrient Input in a Degraded Area |
spellingShingle |
Litterfall and Nutrient Input in a Degraded Area Giácomo,Rômulo Guimarães Eucalyptus urograndis Mabea fistulifera nutrient cycling |
title_short |
Litterfall and Nutrient Input in a Degraded Area |
title_full |
Litterfall and Nutrient Input in a Degraded Area |
title_fullStr |
Litterfall and Nutrient Input in a Degraded Area |
title_full_unstemmed |
Litterfall and Nutrient Input in a Degraded Area |
title_sort |
Litterfall and Nutrient Input in a Degraded Area |
author |
Giácomo,Rômulo Guimarães |
author_facet |
Giácomo,Rômulo Guimarães Alves,Marlene Cristina Camara,Rodrigo Pereira,Marcos Gervasio Arruda,Otton Garcia de Souto,Sebastião Nilce Moraes,Mário Luis Teixeira de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alves,Marlene Cristina Camara,Rodrigo Pereira,Marcos Gervasio Arruda,Otton Garcia de Souto,Sebastião Nilce Moraes,Mário Luis Teixeira de |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Giácomo,Rômulo Guimarães Alves,Marlene Cristina Camara,Rodrigo Pereira,Marcos Gervasio Arruda,Otton Garcia de Souto,Sebastião Nilce Moraes,Mário Luis Teixeira de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Eucalyptus urograndis Mabea fistulifera nutrient cycling |
topic |
Eucalyptus urograndis Mabea fistulifera nutrient cycling |
description |
ABSTRACT This study aimed to test the effects of fertilization with organic compost from industrial production of pulp on the litterfall and nutrient input of monospecific plantations in a loan area. The treatments consisted of three doses of the organic compost D10, D15 and D20 (10, 15 and 20 Mg ha-1, respectively), mineral conventional fertilization (DAM) and no fertilization (D0) in land plots (N = 4/treatment/species; 15 x 12 m). Litterfall was monthly collected by two traps (0.72 m2/plot) and sorted out into leaves, twigs, seeds, flowers, fruits and others. We determined the input of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium. There were no differences among the treatments and between species in terms of total annual litterfall. The higher nutrient input was obtained by DAM, followed by D10, in both plantations. The annual nutrient input was higher for the litterfall on the E. urograndis plantation. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872017000100136 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872017000100136 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2179-8087.002816 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Floresta e Ambiente v.24 2017 reponame:Floresta e Ambiente instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) instacron:UFRJ |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
instacron_str |
UFRJ |
institution |
UFRJ |
reponame_str |
Floresta e Ambiente |
collection |
Floresta e Ambiente |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
floramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br|| |
_version_ |
1750128141656915968 |