Edaphic Invertebrates as Indicators of Soil Integrity Quality
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Floresta e Ambiente |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872021000200306 |
Resumo: | Abstract Bioindicator organisms, such as edaphic invertebrates, are constantly used to assess disturbance, as they exhibit responses such as reduced community and changes in diversity, affecting the local ecosystem. The aim of this study was to compare the impacts of disturbance on the edaphic invertebrate community in both a pasture area and a native forest area, during summer and winter. Samplings were conducted for nine days using pitfalls. Bray-Curtis analyses, NMDS, ANOSIM, and SIMPER were applied. There was difference in richness and diversity between areas and seasons. Native forest pitfalls had higher similarity in abundance and diversity in both seasons than pasture pitfalls. Specimens belonging to 20 orders were collected; of those, Collembola, Hymenoptera, Diptera, and Hemiptera had the highest number of individuals. Seasonal influence on the organisms was evident. The impact on edaphic invertebrate community located in the pasture area showed that native forest has higher complexity and structural stability. |
id |
UFRJ-3_8fc60c00b3ab82691b59219b0b6d2d64 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S2179-80872021000200306 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRJ-3 |
network_name_str |
Floresta e Ambiente |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Edaphic Invertebrates as Indicators of Soil Integrity QualityAtlantic Forestbioindicatorsedaphic arthropodsimpacted areapastureAbstract Bioindicator organisms, such as edaphic invertebrates, are constantly used to assess disturbance, as they exhibit responses such as reduced community and changes in diversity, affecting the local ecosystem. The aim of this study was to compare the impacts of disturbance on the edaphic invertebrate community in both a pasture area and a native forest area, during summer and winter. Samplings were conducted for nine days using pitfalls. Bray-Curtis analyses, NMDS, ANOSIM, and SIMPER were applied. There was difference in richness and diversity between areas and seasons. Native forest pitfalls had higher similarity in abundance and diversity in both seasons than pasture pitfalls. Specimens belonging to 20 orders were collected; of those, Collembola, Hymenoptera, Diptera, and Hemiptera had the highest number of individuals. Seasonal influence on the organisms was evident. The impact on edaphic invertebrate community located in the pasture area showed that native forest has higher complexity and structural stability.Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro2021-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872021000200306Floresta e Ambiente v.28 n.2 2021reponame:Floresta e Ambienteinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/2179-8087-floram-2020-0069info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGedoz,MilenaFreitas,Elisete MariaSilva,Vinícius Leão daJohann,Lianaeng2021-01-15T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2179-80872021000200306Revistahttps://www.floram.org/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpfloramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br||2179-80871415-0980opendoar:2021-01-15T00:00Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Edaphic Invertebrates as Indicators of Soil Integrity Quality |
title |
Edaphic Invertebrates as Indicators of Soil Integrity Quality |
spellingShingle |
Edaphic Invertebrates as Indicators of Soil Integrity Quality Gedoz,Milena Atlantic Forest bioindicators edaphic arthropods impacted area pasture |
title_short |
Edaphic Invertebrates as Indicators of Soil Integrity Quality |
title_full |
Edaphic Invertebrates as Indicators of Soil Integrity Quality |
title_fullStr |
Edaphic Invertebrates as Indicators of Soil Integrity Quality |
title_full_unstemmed |
Edaphic Invertebrates as Indicators of Soil Integrity Quality |
title_sort |
Edaphic Invertebrates as Indicators of Soil Integrity Quality |
author |
Gedoz,Milena |
author_facet |
Gedoz,Milena Freitas,Elisete Maria Silva,Vinícius Leão da Johann,Liana |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Freitas,Elisete Maria Silva,Vinícius Leão da Johann,Liana |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gedoz,Milena Freitas,Elisete Maria Silva,Vinícius Leão da Johann,Liana |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Atlantic Forest bioindicators edaphic arthropods impacted area pasture |
topic |
Atlantic Forest bioindicators edaphic arthropods impacted area pasture |
description |
Abstract Bioindicator organisms, such as edaphic invertebrates, are constantly used to assess disturbance, as they exhibit responses such as reduced community and changes in diversity, affecting the local ecosystem. The aim of this study was to compare the impacts of disturbance on the edaphic invertebrate community in both a pasture area and a native forest area, during summer and winter. Samplings were conducted for nine days using pitfalls. Bray-Curtis analyses, NMDS, ANOSIM, and SIMPER were applied. There was difference in richness and diversity between areas and seasons. Native forest pitfalls had higher similarity in abundance and diversity in both seasons than pasture pitfalls. Specimens belonging to 20 orders were collected; of those, Collembola, Hymenoptera, Diptera, and Hemiptera had the highest number of individuals. Seasonal influence on the organisms was evident. The impact on edaphic invertebrate community located in the pasture area showed that native forest has higher complexity and structural stability. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872021000200306 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872021000200306 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/2179-8087-floram-2020-0069 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Floresta e Ambiente v.28 n.2 2021 reponame:Floresta e Ambiente instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) instacron:UFRJ |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
instacron_str |
UFRJ |
institution |
UFRJ |
reponame_str |
Floresta e Ambiente |
collection |
Floresta e Ambiente |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
floramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br|| |
_version_ |
1750128143744630784 |