Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852022000200074 |
Resumo: | ABSTRACT Objective This study explores the relationship between patients’ self-assessment and physicians’ evaluation regarding clinical stability. Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out at the general outpatient clinic of the Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB-UFRJ) in a large sample (1,447) of outpatients, of which 67.9% were patients with severe mental disorders (SMD). We collected information using a structured questionnaire developed for this purpose, filled in by the patient’s physician. Clinical stability was assessed by means of five psychiatric instability criteria and by the physician’s global clinical impression over the six previous months. The patients’ self-assessment was based on a question about how they evaluated their health status: stable/better, worse, does not know. For the analyses, patients’ self-evaluation was considered as our standard. Results The sample was composed of 824 (57%) women with an average age of 49 years. The most prevalent diagnoses within the SMD category corresponded to 937 patients, of whom 846 (90.3%) assessed themselves as stable/better. The physicians’ evaluations agreed more with patients with bipolar disorders and less with schizophrenics regarding stability. As for patients with depressive disorder, physicians agreed more with them regarding instability. Conclusion The data analysis confirms our hypothesis that the self-assessment made by patients with SMD was accurate regarding their health condition, and that the self-assessment made by patients who considered themselves stable agree with the physicians’ evaluation. |
id |
UFRJ-6_ae1f19bb6c0f62c9003d0eb731b0231b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0047-20852022000200074 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRJ-6 |
network_name_str |
Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional studyBipolar disorderdepressive disordersevere mental disordersschizophreniaself-assessmentABSTRACT Objective This study explores the relationship between patients’ self-assessment and physicians’ evaluation regarding clinical stability. Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out at the general outpatient clinic of the Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB-UFRJ) in a large sample (1,447) of outpatients, of which 67.9% were patients with severe mental disorders (SMD). We collected information using a structured questionnaire developed for this purpose, filled in by the patient’s physician. Clinical stability was assessed by means of five psychiatric instability criteria and by the physician’s global clinical impression over the six previous months. The patients’ self-assessment was based on a question about how they evaluated their health status: stable/better, worse, does not know. For the analyses, patients’ self-evaluation was considered as our standard. Results The sample was composed of 824 (57%) women with an average age of 49 years. The most prevalent diagnoses within the SMD category corresponded to 937 patients, of whom 846 (90.3%) assessed themselves as stable/better. The physicians’ evaluations agreed more with patients with bipolar disorders and less with schizophrenics regarding stability. As for patients with depressive disorder, physicians agreed more with them regarding instability. Conclusion The data analysis confirms our hypothesis that the self-assessment made by patients with SMD was accurate regarding their health condition, and that the self-assessment made by patients who considered themselves stable agree with the physicians’ evaluation.Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852022000200074Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria v.71 n.2 2022reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/0047-2085000000344info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessOliveira,Iraneide Castro deRocha Neto,Helio G.Nascimento,IsabellaPinto,Vanessa Andrade MartinsAppolinario,José CarlosCavalcanti,Maria Tavareseng2022-07-12T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0047-20852022000200074Revistahttp://portalrev.enfermagem.bvs.br/index.php?issn=0047-2085&lang=ptONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||editora@ipub.ufrj.br1982-02080047-2085opendoar:2022-07-12T00:00Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study |
title |
Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study |
spellingShingle |
Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study Oliveira,Iraneide Castro de Bipolar disorder depressive disorder severe mental disorders schizophrenia self-assessment |
title_short |
Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study |
title_full |
Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr |
Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study |
title_sort |
Patients and physician’s self-assessment regarding clinical stability in severe mental disorders: a cross-sectional study |
author |
Oliveira,Iraneide Castro de |
author_facet |
Oliveira,Iraneide Castro de Rocha Neto,Helio G. Nascimento,Isabella Pinto,Vanessa Andrade Martins Appolinario,José Carlos Cavalcanti,Maria Tavares |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rocha Neto,Helio G. Nascimento,Isabella Pinto,Vanessa Andrade Martins Appolinario,José Carlos Cavalcanti,Maria Tavares |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Oliveira,Iraneide Castro de Rocha Neto,Helio G. Nascimento,Isabella Pinto,Vanessa Andrade Martins Appolinario,José Carlos Cavalcanti,Maria Tavares |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bipolar disorder depressive disorder severe mental disorders schizophrenia self-assessment |
topic |
Bipolar disorder depressive disorder severe mental disorders schizophrenia self-assessment |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective This study explores the relationship between patients’ self-assessment and physicians’ evaluation regarding clinical stability. Methods This cross-sectional study was carried out at the general outpatient clinic of the Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (IPUB-UFRJ) in a large sample (1,447) of outpatients, of which 67.9% were patients with severe mental disorders (SMD). We collected information using a structured questionnaire developed for this purpose, filled in by the patient’s physician. Clinical stability was assessed by means of five psychiatric instability criteria and by the physician’s global clinical impression over the six previous months. The patients’ self-assessment was based on a question about how they evaluated their health status: stable/better, worse, does not know. For the analyses, patients’ self-evaluation was considered as our standard. Results The sample was composed of 824 (57%) women with an average age of 49 years. The most prevalent diagnoses within the SMD category corresponded to 937 patients, of whom 846 (90.3%) assessed themselves as stable/better. The physicians’ evaluations agreed more with patients with bipolar disorders and less with schizophrenics regarding stability. As for patients with depressive disorder, physicians agreed more with them regarding instability. Conclusion The data analysis confirms our hypothesis that the self-assessment made by patients with SMD was accurate regarding their health condition, and that the self-assessment made by patients who considered themselves stable agree with the physicians’ evaluation. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852022000200074 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0047-20852022000200074 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0047-2085000000344 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria v.71 n.2 2022 reponame:Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) instacron:UFRJ |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
instacron_str |
UFRJ |
institution |
UFRJ |
reponame_str |
Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) |
collection |
Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Jornal Brasileiro de Psiquiatria (Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||editora@ipub.ufrj.br |
_version_ |
1750128247740301312 |