Likely, possible or remote? A study about tax contingencies of Brazilian banks

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Schmitt, Matheus
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Fagundes, Ernando, Alex Mussoi Ribeiro
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Ambiente Contábil
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambiente/article/view/18364
Resumo: Purpose:  Aims to identify the determining factors to tax provisions and contingent tax liabilities classification by Brazilian financial institutions. The tax nature was chosen due to the representativeness of these contingencies. Financial institutions were listed according to the scarcity of similar research. Methodology: In order to analyze the determinant factors to the provisions and contingencies classification, it was used a logistic regression model. The analyzed companies belong to Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão (B3) and the period analyzed is 2016’s financial year. Results: The average of process in which financial institutions are defendants has 5 years of commencement and the relative process value (ratio between the amount of the lawsuit and the company's assets) represents an average of 0.4%. The results of the study support Ribeiro (2012), since there is divergence of opinions beetween the legislation’s interpretation and the determination of loss’ probability, as presents itself as a feasible practice of earnings management. The results also support Hennes (2014) that observed the insufficiency of quantitative disclosures to determine the loss expectations as support Aharony and Dotan (2004) that demonstrated the lower conservatism of managers and auditors when compared to financial analysts. In the same vein similar studies and the Positive Accounting Theory, this study concludes that the discretionarity provided to managers can contribute to information management, enabling its use for informational or opportunistic purposes. Contributions of the Study: The contribution of this study is to elucidate questions related to the elements that guide the criteria to provisions and contingent liabilities’ classifications used by managers. Thus, it contributes by highlighting as characteristics related to the processes (administrative or judicial sphere), the instance, its value and its term of conduct may influence on the classification as probable, possible or remote.
id UFRN-3_463466f5d643ccf7f0486b20807654ca
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/18364
network_acronym_str UFRN-3
network_name_str Revista Ambiente Contábil
repository_id_str
spelling Likely, possible or remote? A study about tax contingencies of Brazilian banks¿Probable, posible o remoto? Un estudio sobre contingencias fiscales de bancos brasileñosProvável, possível ou remoto? Um estudo acerca das contingências tributárias dos bancos brasileirosContingent Liabilities. Provision. Probability of defeat.Pasivos contingentes. Provisión. Probabilidad de derrota.Passivos Contingentes. Provisão. Chance de Perda.Identificar fatores determinantes na classificação das provisões e passivos contingentes tributários pelas instituições financeiras brasileiras.Purpose:  Aims to identify the determining factors to tax provisions and contingent tax liabilities classification by Brazilian financial institutions. The tax nature was chosen due to the representativeness of these contingencies. Financial institutions were listed according to the scarcity of similar research. Methodology: In order to analyze the determinant factors to the provisions and contingencies classification, it was used a logistic regression model. The analyzed companies belong to Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão (B3) and the period analyzed is 2016’s financial year. Results: The average of process in which financial institutions are defendants has 5 years of commencement and the relative process value (ratio between the amount of the lawsuit and the company's assets) represents an average of 0.4%. The results of the study support Ribeiro (2012), since there is divergence of opinions beetween the legislation’s interpretation and the determination of loss’ probability, as presents itself as a feasible practice of earnings management. The results also support Hennes (2014) that observed the insufficiency of quantitative disclosures to determine the loss expectations as support Aharony and Dotan (2004) that demonstrated the lower conservatism of managers and auditors when compared to financial analysts. In the same vein similar studies and the Positive Accounting Theory, this study concludes that the discretionarity provided to managers can contribute to information management, enabling its use for informational or opportunistic purposes. Contributions of the Study: The contribution of this study is to elucidate questions related to the elements that guide the criteria to provisions and contingent liabilities’ classifications used by managers. Thus, it contributes by highlighting as characteristics related to the processes (administrative or judicial sphere), the instance, its value and its term of conduct may influence on the classification as probable, possible or remote.Objetivo: Identificar factores determinantes en la clasificación de las provisiones fiscales y pasivos contingentes por parte de las instituciones financieras brasileñas. La naturaleza fiscal se eligió debido a la representatividad de estas contingencias. Las instituciones financieras fueron enumeradas por la escasez de investigaciones similares. Metodología: Para analizar los determinantes de la clasificación de provisiones y contingencias, se utilizó un modelo de regresión logística. Las empresas analizadas pertenecen a Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão (B3) y el período analizado incluye el ejercicio 2016. Resultados: El promedio de los procedimientos en los que las instituciones financieras son demandados tiene 5 años de inicio y el valor relativo de los procedimientos (relación entre el monto de la demanda y los activos de la compañía) representa un promedio de 0.4%. Los resultados del estudio corroboran Ribeiro (2012), ya que existe divergencia de opinión en la interpretación de la legislación y en la determinación de la posibilidad de pérdida, siendo una práctica factible de gestión de ganancias. Corrobora con Hennes (2014), ya que observó la insuficiencia de revelaciones cuantitativas para determinar las expectativas de pérdida y con Aharony y Dotan (2004) quienes demostraron el menor conservadurismo de los gerentes y auditores en comparación con los analistas financieros. En línea con estudios similares y la Teoría de la Contabilidad Positiva, se concluye que la discreción proporcionada a los gerentes puede contribuir a la gestión de la información, permitiendo su uso con fines informativos u oportunistas. Contribuciones del Estudio: La contribución de este estudio es dilucidar preguntas relacionadas con los elementos que guían los criterios para la clasificación de provisiones y pasivos contingentes utilizados por los gerentes. Por lo tanto, contribuye destacando como características relacionadas con los procesos (esfera administrativa o judicial), la instancia, su valor y su plazo de conducta pueden influir en la clasificación como probable, posible o remota.Objetivo: Identificar fatores determinantes na classificação das provisões e passivos contingentes tributários pelas instituições financeiras brasileiras. A natureza tributária foi escolhida devido a representatividade destas contingências. Já as instituições financeiras foram elencadas pela escassez de pesquisas similares. Metodologia: Para analisar os fatores determinantes da classificação provisões e contingências foi utilizado um modelo de regressão logística. As empresas analisadas pertencem a Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão (B3) e o período analisado compreende o exercício de 2016. Resultados: A média dos processos em que as instituições financeiras são rés apresentam 5 anos de instauração e o valor relativo dos processos (razão entre montante do processo e ativo da empresa) representa em média 0,4%. Os resultados do estudo corroboram a Ribeiro (2012), uma vez que existe divergência de opiniões na interpretação da legislação e na determinação da chance de perda, sendo uma prática factível de gerenciamento de resultados. Corrobora com Hennes (2014), visto que observou a insuficiência das divulgações quantitativas para determinar as expectativas de perda e com Aharony e Dotan (2004) que demonstraram o menor conservadorismo dos gestores e auditores quando comparados aos analistas financeiros. Alinhando aos estudos similares e a Teoria Positiva da Contabilidade, conclui-se que a discricionariedade fornecida aos gestores pode contribuir no gerenciamento de informações, possibilitando o uso desta com intuito informativo ou oportunista. Contribuições do Estudo: A contribuição deste estudo está em elucidar questões relacionadas aos elementos que direcionam os critérios de classificação das provisões e dos passivos contingentes utilizados pelos gestores. Assim, contribui evidenciando como características relacionadas com os processos (esfera administrativa ou judicial), a instância, o seu valor e seu prazo de condução podem influenciar na classificação como provável, possível ou remoto.Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN2020-01-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambiente/article/view/1836410.21680/2176-9036.2020v12n1ID18364REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): Jan./Jun.; 109-129REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2020): Jan./Jun.; 109-129REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - ISSN 2176-9036; v. 12 n. 1 (2020): Jan./Jun.; 109-1292176-903610.21680/2176-9036.2020v12n1reponame:Revista Ambiente Contábilinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambiente/article/view/18364/12364Copyright (c) 2020 REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - ISSN 2176-9036info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSchmitt, Matheus Fagundes, ErnandoAlex Mussoi Ribeiro2020-03-11T17:00:10Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/18364Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambientePUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambiente/oai||prof.mauriciocsilva@gmail.com2176-90362176-9036opendoar:2020-03-11T17:00:10Revista Ambiente Contábil - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Likely, possible or remote? A study about tax contingencies of Brazilian banks
¿Probable, posible o remoto? Un estudio sobre contingencias fiscales de bancos brasileños
Provável, possível ou remoto? Um estudo acerca das contingências tributárias dos bancos brasileiros
title Likely, possible or remote? A study about tax contingencies of Brazilian banks
spellingShingle Likely, possible or remote? A study about tax contingencies of Brazilian banks
Schmitt, Matheus
Contingent Liabilities. Provision. Probability of defeat.
Pasivos contingentes. Provisión. Probabilidad de derrota.
Passivos Contingentes. Provisão. Chance de Perda.
Identificar fatores determinantes na classificação das provisões e passivos contingentes tributários pelas instituições financeiras brasileiras.
title_short Likely, possible or remote? A study about tax contingencies of Brazilian banks
title_full Likely, possible or remote? A study about tax contingencies of Brazilian banks
title_fullStr Likely, possible or remote? A study about tax contingencies of Brazilian banks
title_full_unstemmed Likely, possible or remote? A study about tax contingencies of Brazilian banks
title_sort Likely, possible or remote? A study about tax contingencies of Brazilian banks
author Schmitt, Matheus
author_facet Schmitt, Matheus
Fagundes, Ernando
Alex Mussoi Ribeiro
author_role author
author2 Fagundes, Ernando
Alex Mussoi Ribeiro
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Schmitt, Matheus
Fagundes, Ernando
Alex Mussoi Ribeiro
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Contingent Liabilities. Provision. Probability of defeat.
Pasivos contingentes. Provisión. Probabilidad de derrota.
Passivos Contingentes. Provisão. Chance de Perda.
Identificar fatores determinantes na classificação das provisões e passivos contingentes tributários pelas instituições financeiras brasileiras.
topic Contingent Liabilities. Provision. Probability of defeat.
Pasivos contingentes. Provisión. Probabilidad de derrota.
Passivos Contingentes. Provisão. Chance de Perda.
Identificar fatores determinantes na classificação das provisões e passivos contingentes tributários pelas instituições financeiras brasileiras.
description Purpose:  Aims to identify the determining factors to tax provisions and contingent tax liabilities classification by Brazilian financial institutions. The tax nature was chosen due to the representativeness of these contingencies. Financial institutions were listed according to the scarcity of similar research. Methodology: In order to analyze the determinant factors to the provisions and contingencies classification, it was used a logistic regression model. The analyzed companies belong to Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão (B3) and the period analyzed is 2016’s financial year. Results: The average of process in which financial institutions are defendants has 5 years of commencement and the relative process value (ratio between the amount of the lawsuit and the company's assets) represents an average of 0.4%. The results of the study support Ribeiro (2012), since there is divergence of opinions beetween the legislation’s interpretation and the determination of loss’ probability, as presents itself as a feasible practice of earnings management. The results also support Hennes (2014) that observed the insufficiency of quantitative disclosures to determine the loss expectations as support Aharony and Dotan (2004) that demonstrated the lower conservatism of managers and auditors when compared to financial analysts. In the same vein similar studies and the Positive Accounting Theory, this study concludes that the discretionarity provided to managers can contribute to information management, enabling its use for informational or opportunistic purposes. Contributions of the Study: The contribution of this study is to elucidate questions related to the elements that guide the criteria to provisions and contingent liabilities’ classifications used by managers. Thus, it contributes by highlighting as characteristics related to the processes (administrative or judicial sphere), the instance, its value and its term of conduct may influence on the classification as probable, possible or remote.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-01-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambiente/article/view/18364
10.21680/2176-9036.2020v12n1ID18364
url https://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambiente/article/view/18364
identifier_str_mv 10.21680/2176-9036.2020v12n1ID18364
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/ambiente/article/view/18364/12364
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Portal de Periódicos Eletrônicos da UFRN
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): Jan./Jun.; 109-129
REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2020): Jan./Jun.; 109-129
REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTÁBIL - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte - ISSN 2176-9036; v. 12 n. 1 (2020): Jan./Jun.; 109-129
2176-9036
10.21680/2176-9036.2020v12n1
reponame:Revista Ambiente Contábil
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron:UFRN
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron_str UFRN
institution UFRN
reponame_str Revista Ambiente Contábil
collection Revista Ambiente Contábil
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Ambiente Contábil - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||prof.mauriciocsilva@gmail.com
_version_ 1799770188993789952