Reconditioning the conditional [Recondicionando o condicional]
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Princípios (Natal. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7481 |
Resumo: | Many authors have hoped to understand the indicative conditional construction in everyday language by means of what are usually called conditional probabilities. Other authors have hoped to make sense of conditional probabilities in terms of the absolute probabilities of conditional statements. Although all such hopes were disappointed by the triviality theorems of Lewis (1976), there have been copious subsequent attempts both to rescue CCCP (the conditional construal of conditional probability) and to extend and to intensify the arguments against it. In this paper it will be shown that triviality is avoidable if the probability function is replaced by an alternative generalization of the deducibility relation, the measure of deductive dependence of Miller and Popper (1986). It will be suggested further that this alternative way of orchestrating conditionals is nicely in harmony with the test proposed in Ramsey (1931), and also with the idea that it is not the truth value of a conditionalstatement that is of primary concern but its assertability or acceptability. |
id |
UFRN-5_347f4016bd64f1fa31fd1d7e2f03d861 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/7481 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN-5 |
network_name_str |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Reconditioning the conditional [Recondicionando o condicional]Indicative conditionalsProbabilityTrivialityDeductive dependenceAdamsLewisRamseyStalnakerMany authors have hoped to understand the indicative conditional construction in everyday language by means of what are usually called conditional probabilities. Other authors have hoped to make sense of conditional probabilities in terms of the absolute probabilities of conditional statements. Although all such hopes were disappointed by the triviality theorems of Lewis (1976), there have been copious subsequent attempts both to rescue CCCP (the conditional construal of conditional probability) and to extend and to intensify the arguments against it. In this paper it will be shown that triviality is avoidable if the probability function is replaced by an alternative generalization of the deducibility relation, the measure of deductive dependence of Miller and Popper (1986). It will be suggested further that this alternative way of orchestrating conditionals is nicely in harmony with the test proposed in Ramsey (1931), and also with the idea that it is not the truth value of a conditionalstatement that is of primary concern but its assertability or acceptability.EDUFRN2016-06-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/748110.21680/1983-2109.2016v23n40ID7481Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 23 n. 40 (2016): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); 9-271983-21090104-869410.21680/1983-2109.2016v23n40reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNenghttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7481/pdfCopyright (c) 2016 David Millerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMiller, David2021-10-06T12:28:06Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/7481Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principiosPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/oai||principios@cchla.ufrn.br1983-21090104-8694opendoar:2021-10-06T12:28:06Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Reconditioning the conditional [Recondicionando o condicional] |
title |
Reconditioning the conditional [Recondicionando o condicional] |
spellingShingle |
Reconditioning the conditional [Recondicionando o condicional] Miller, David Indicative conditionals Probability Triviality Deductive dependence Adams Lewis Ramsey Stalnaker |
title_short |
Reconditioning the conditional [Recondicionando o condicional] |
title_full |
Reconditioning the conditional [Recondicionando o condicional] |
title_fullStr |
Reconditioning the conditional [Recondicionando o condicional] |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reconditioning the conditional [Recondicionando o condicional] |
title_sort |
Reconditioning the conditional [Recondicionando o condicional] |
author |
Miller, David |
author_facet |
Miller, David |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Miller, David |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Indicative conditionals Probability Triviality Deductive dependence Adams Lewis Ramsey Stalnaker |
topic |
Indicative conditionals Probability Triviality Deductive dependence Adams Lewis Ramsey Stalnaker |
description |
Many authors have hoped to understand the indicative conditional construction in everyday language by means of what are usually called conditional probabilities. Other authors have hoped to make sense of conditional probabilities in terms of the absolute probabilities of conditional statements. Although all such hopes were disappointed by the triviality theorems of Lewis (1976), there have been copious subsequent attempts both to rescue CCCP (the conditional construal of conditional probability) and to extend and to intensify the arguments against it. In this paper it will be shown that triviality is avoidable if the probability function is replaced by an alternative generalization of the deducibility relation, the measure of deductive dependence of Miller and Popper (1986). It will be suggested further that this alternative way of orchestrating conditionals is nicely in harmony with the test proposed in Ramsey (1931), and also with the idea that it is not the truth value of a conditionalstatement that is of primary concern but its assertability or acceptability. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-06-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7481 10.21680/1983-2109.2016v23n40ID7481 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7481 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21680/1983-2109.2016v23n40ID7481 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/7481/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 David Miller info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 David Miller |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFRN |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFRN |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 23 n. 40 (2016): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); 9-27 1983-2109 0104-8694 10.21680/1983-2109.2016v23n40 reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
collection |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||principios@cchla.ufrn.br |
_version_ |
1799769978245742592 |