Anthropocene and positionality (Ge-Stell): An epoch provoked by human or where human is provoked?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Princípios (Natal. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/23057 |
Resumo: | The scientific community is debating on the possibility of a new contemporary era for the Planet Earth. No longer the holocene, but we now live the anthropocene. The debate proposes that the human has become a most influential cause on geological and biochemical processes of this planet. Amongst the several analyses that tries to identify the origins of this new era, there is that one which signals to a “Great Acceleration”, both populational and industrial, occurred during the 1950s. At this same decade, Martin Heidegger started to rehearse in his philosophical inquiries a new concept to express the essence of our contemporary age: positionality [Ge-Stell]. This article tries to evaluate the anthropocene diagnosis in correspondence to some heideggerian works. It is structured as follows: first, a brief introduction to the cientific debate about the anthropocene, side by side with a reading of the Antígona first chorus; after that, it follows Heidegger’s thought on human essence herein his interpretation of the same chorus; as a third step, we present an Heidegger’s interpretation of positionality as the essence of modern and contemporary age. |
id |
UFRN-5_4fe86059c4b4a8143ac691f46bdedd15 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/23057 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN-5 |
network_name_str |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Anthropocene and positionality (Ge-Stell): An epoch provoked by human or where human is provoked?Antropoceno e com-posição (Ge-stell): Uma época provocada pelo humano ou na qual ele é provocado?anthropocenehumanpositionalityGe-stellantropocenohumanocom-posiçãoGe-stellThe scientific community is debating on the possibility of a new contemporary era for the Planet Earth. No longer the holocene, but we now live the anthropocene. The debate proposes that the human has become a most influential cause on geological and biochemical processes of this planet. Amongst the several analyses that tries to identify the origins of this new era, there is that one which signals to a “Great Acceleration”, both populational and industrial, occurred during the 1950s. At this same decade, Martin Heidegger started to rehearse in his philosophical inquiries a new concept to express the essence of our contemporary age: positionality [Ge-Stell]. This article tries to evaluate the anthropocene diagnosis in correspondence to some heideggerian works. It is structured as follows: first, a brief introduction to the cientific debate about the anthropocene, side by side with a reading of the Antígona first chorus; after that, it follows Heidegger’s thought on human essence herein his interpretation of the same chorus; as a third step, we present an Heidegger’s interpretation of positionality as the essence of modern and contemporary age.Há duas décadas a comunidade científica debate a possibilidade de o planeta Terra ter entrado em uma nova era. Não mais o holoceno, mas o antropoceno. Defende-se que o humano se tornara causa eficiente das mais influentes nos processos geológicos e biológicos deste planeta. Dentre as várias propostas que visam identificar as origens desta nova era há aquela que acena para uma “Grande Aceleração” industrial e populacional que ocorre a partir dos anos 1950. Nessa mesma década Martin Heidegger começava a ensaiar em suas reflexões uma palavra que previa a essência da nossa época: com-posição [Ge-Stell]. O presente artigo busca avaliar a proposta de diagnóstico do antropoceno a partir de algumas investigações empreendidas por Heidegger. Para tal, estrutura-se da seguinte forma: primeiro, uma breve introdução ao debate científico sobre o antropoceno em paralelo à apreciação de um estásimo da Antígona; depois adentraremos na reflexão de Heidegger sobre a essência do humano, precisamente em sua interpretação do mesmo estásimo de Sófocles; por terceiro faremos uma exposição da interpretação heideggeriana sobre a era da com-posição.EDUFRN2021-05-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/2305710.21680/1983-2109.2021v28n56ID23057Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 28 n. 56 (2021): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); 49-651983-21090104-869410.21680/1983-2109.2021v28n56reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/23057/14252Copyright (c) 2021 Anderson Kaue Plebaniinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPlebani, Anderson Kaue2021-06-02T15:47:28Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/23057Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principiosPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/oai||principios@cchla.ufrn.br1983-21090104-8694opendoar:2021-06-02T15:47:28Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Anthropocene and positionality (Ge-Stell): An epoch provoked by human or where human is provoked? Antropoceno e com-posição (Ge-stell): Uma época provocada pelo humano ou na qual ele é provocado? |
title |
Anthropocene and positionality (Ge-Stell): An epoch provoked by human or where human is provoked? |
spellingShingle |
Anthropocene and positionality (Ge-Stell): An epoch provoked by human or where human is provoked? Plebani, Anderson Kaue anthropocene human positionality Ge-stell antropoceno humano com-posição Ge-stell |
title_short |
Anthropocene and positionality (Ge-Stell): An epoch provoked by human or where human is provoked? |
title_full |
Anthropocene and positionality (Ge-Stell): An epoch provoked by human or where human is provoked? |
title_fullStr |
Anthropocene and positionality (Ge-Stell): An epoch provoked by human or where human is provoked? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Anthropocene and positionality (Ge-Stell): An epoch provoked by human or where human is provoked? |
title_sort |
Anthropocene and positionality (Ge-Stell): An epoch provoked by human or where human is provoked? |
author |
Plebani, Anderson Kaue |
author_facet |
Plebani, Anderson Kaue |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Plebani, Anderson Kaue |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
anthropocene human positionality Ge-stell antropoceno humano com-posição Ge-stell |
topic |
anthropocene human positionality Ge-stell antropoceno humano com-posição Ge-stell |
description |
The scientific community is debating on the possibility of a new contemporary era for the Planet Earth. No longer the holocene, but we now live the anthropocene. The debate proposes that the human has become a most influential cause on geological and biochemical processes of this planet. Amongst the several analyses that tries to identify the origins of this new era, there is that one which signals to a “Great Acceleration”, both populational and industrial, occurred during the 1950s. At this same decade, Martin Heidegger started to rehearse in his philosophical inquiries a new concept to express the essence of our contemporary age: positionality [Ge-Stell]. This article tries to evaluate the anthropocene diagnosis in correspondence to some heideggerian works. It is structured as follows: first, a brief introduction to the cientific debate about the anthropocene, side by side with a reading of the Antígona first chorus; after that, it follows Heidegger’s thought on human essence herein his interpretation of the same chorus; as a third step, we present an Heidegger’s interpretation of positionality as the essence of modern and contemporary age. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-05-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/23057 10.21680/1983-2109.2021v28n56ID23057 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/23057 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21680/1983-2109.2021v28n56ID23057 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/23057/14252 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Anderson Kaue Plebani info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2021 Anderson Kaue Plebani |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFRN |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFRN |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 28 n. 56 (2021): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); 49-65 1983-2109 0104-8694 10.21680/1983-2109.2021v28n56 reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
collection |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||principios@cchla.ufrn.br |
_version_ |
1799769979620425728 |