A Definição Tradicional de Conhecimento
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Princípios (Natal. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/695 |
Resumo: | In this paper the relevance of so-called "propositional knowledge" is at first compared witho ther forms of knowledge. Secondly,the traditional and standard definition of propositional knowledge as justified true belief is discussed and defended against its most relevant objections. The third and main focus of this paper is a discussion of Gettier's objection to the tradicional definition and some answers to it,with the purpose of developing a more elaborate version of the traditional definition, one which makes it immune to counter-examples, such as those of the Gettier type. |
id |
UFRN-5_a87e6be0eef71bc63332b0cbeefd753c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/695 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN-5 |
network_name_str |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A Definição Tradicional de ConhecimentoIn this paper the relevance of so-called "propositional knowledge" is at first compared witho ther forms of knowledge. Secondly,the traditional and standard definition of propositional knowledge as justified true belief is discussed and defended against its most relevant objections. The third and main focus of this paper is a discussion of Gettier's objection to the tradicional definition and some answers to it,with the purpose of developing a more elaborate version of the traditional definition, one which makes it immune to counter-examples, such as those of the Gettier type. EDUFRN2010-10-04info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/695Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 4 n. 05 (1997): Princípios: revista de filosofia; 63-1021983-21090104-8694reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/695/638Copyright (c) 2014 Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCosta, Claudio Ferreira2016-12-16T16:48:03Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/695Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principiosPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/oai||principios@cchla.ufrn.br1983-21090104-8694opendoar:2016-12-16T16:48:03Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A Definição Tradicional de Conhecimento |
title |
A Definição Tradicional de Conhecimento |
spellingShingle |
A Definição Tradicional de Conhecimento Costa, Claudio Ferreira |
title_short |
A Definição Tradicional de Conhecimento |
title_full |
A Definição Tradicional de Conhecimento |
title_fullStr |
A Definição Tradicional de Conhecimento |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Definição Tradicional de Conhecimento |
title_sort |
A Definição Tradicional de Conhecimento |
author |
Costa, Claudio Ferreira |
author_facet |
Costa, Claudio Ferreira |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Costa, Claudio Ferreira |
description |
In this paper the relevance of so-called "propositional knowledge" is at first compared witho ther forms of knowledge. Secondly,the traditional and standard definition of propositional knowledge as justified true belief is discussed and defended against its most relevant objections. The third and main focus of this paper is a discussion of Gettier's objection to the tradicional definition and some answers to it,with the purpose of developing a more elaborate version of the traditional definition, one which makes it immune to counter-examples, such as those of the Gettier type. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-10-04 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Avaliado pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/695 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/695 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/695/638 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2014 Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN) |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFRN |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EDUFRN |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 4 n. 05 (1997): Princípios: revista de filosofia; 63-102 1983-2109 0104-8694 reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
collection |
Princípios (Natal. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||principios@cchla.ufrn.br |
_version_ |
1799769977446727680 |