Rousseau e a radicalidade democrática : um debate com a interpretação de Kevin Inston

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Moscateli, Renato
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Princípios (Natal. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/31206
Resumo: Rousseau's association to the philosophical sources of democracy is not free of discussion. The author himself preferred the qualification of “republican” instead of “democrat”, and in the Social Contract he pointed out serious difficulties for the existence of democracy as a form of government, even though his theses on popular sovereignty reverberate principles typically linked to democratic constitutions. In view of this, Kevin Inston questioned that contemporary radical democrats have neglected the contribution of the Genevan philosopher, and for this reason he sought to show how much it remains relevant to face the political challenges of our times. However, to what extent are Inston’s efforts to reconcile Rousseau's political theory with contemporary democracy sustainable? Has not the commentator underestimated or ignored crucial elements that make such convergence problematic? The purpose of this paper is to try to provide some answers to such questions.
id UFRN-5_b1eefaeeac9a896cd5958641155bbfc6
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/31206
network_acronym_str UFRN-5
network_name_str Princípios (Natal. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Rousseau e a radicalidade democrática : um debate com a interpretação de Kevin InstonRousseauContrato SocialDemocracia radicalKevin InstonRousseau's association to the philosophical sources of democracy is not free of discussion. The author himself preferred the qualification of “republican” instead of “democrat”, and in the Social Contract he pointed out serious difficulties for the existence of democracy as a form of government, even though his theses on popular sovereignty reverberate principles typically linked to democratic constitutions. In view of this, Kevin Inston questioned that contemporary radical democrats have neglected the contribution of the Genevan philosopher, and for this reason he sought to show how much it remains relevant to face the political challenges of our times. However, to what extent are Inston’s efforts to reconcile Rousseau's political theory with contemporary democracy sustainable? Has not the commentator underestimated or ignored crucial elements that make such convergence problematic? The purpose of this paper is to try to provide some answers to such questions.A associação de Rousseau às fontes filosóficas da democracia não constitui algo livre de discussões. O próprio autor preferia a qualificação de “republicano” em vez de “democrata”, e no Contrato Social apontou sérias dificuldades para a existência da democracia como uma forma de governo, ainda que suas teses sobre a soberania popular reverberem princípios tipicamente ligados às constituições democráticas. Diante disso, Kevin Inston questionou que os democratas radicais contemporâneos tenham negligenciado a contribuição do filósofo genebrino, e por isto buscou mostrar o quanto ela continua sendo relevante para enfrentar os desafios políticos da atualidade. Todavia, em que medida se sustentam os esforços de Inston para compatibilizar a teoria política rousseauniana com a democracia contemporânea? Não terá o comentador subestimado ou ignorado elementos cruciais que tornam tal convergência problemática? O objetivo deste artigo é tentar fornecer algumas respostas para tais perguntas.EDUFRN2023-09-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado pelos paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/3120610.21680/1983-2109.2023v30n62ID31206Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 30 n. 62 (2023): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN)1983-21090104-869410.21680/1983-2109.2023v30n62reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/31206/17510Copyright (c) 2023 Renato Moscatelihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMoscateli, Renato2023-09-26T12:04:54Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/31206Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principiosPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/oai||principios@cchla.ufrn.br1983-21090104-8694opendoar:2023-09-26T12:04:54Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Rousseau e a radicalidade democrática : um debate com a interpretação de Kevin Inston
title Rousseau e a radicalidade democrática : um debate com a interpretação de Kevin Inston
spellingShingle Rousseau e a radicalidade democrática : um debate com a interpretação de Kevin Inston
Moscateli, Renato
Rousseau
Contrato Social
Democracia radical
Kevin Inston
title_short Rousseau e a radicalidade democrática : um debate com a interpretação de Kevin Inston
title_full Rousseau e a radicalidade democrática : um debate com a interpretação de Kevin Inston
title_fullStr Rousseau e a radicalidade democrática : um debate com a interpretação de Kevin Inston
title_full_unstemmed Rousseau e a radicalidade democrática : um debate com a interpretação de Kevin Inston
title_sort Rousseau e a radicalidade democrática : um debate com a interpretação de Kevin Inston
author Moscateli, Renato
author_facet Moscateli, Renato
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Moscateli, Renato
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Rousseau
Contrato Social
Democracia radical
Kevin Inston
topic Rousseau
Contrato Social
Democracia radical
Kevin Inston
description Rousseau's association to the philosophical sources of democracy is not free of discussion. The author himself preferred the qualification of “republican” instead of “democrat”, and in the Social Contract he pointed out serious difficulties for the existence of democracy as a form of government, even though his theses on popular sovereignty reverberate principles typically linked to democratic constitutions. In view of this, Kevin Inston questioned that contemporary radical democrats have neglected the contribution of the Genevan philosopher, and for this reason he sought to show how much it remains relevant to face the political challenges of our times. However, to what extent are Inston’s efforts to reconcile Rousseau's political theory with contemporary democracy sustainable? Has not the commentator underestimated or ignored crucial elements that make such convergence problematic? The purpose of this paper is to try to provide some answers to such questions.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-09-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado pelos pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/31206
10.21680/1983-2109.2023v30n62ID31206
url https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/31206
identifier_str_mv 10.21680/1983-2109.2023v30n62ID31206
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.ufrn.br/principios/article/view/31206/17510
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Renato Moscateli
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Renato Moscateli
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFRN
publisher.none.fl_str_mv EDUFRN
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN); v. 30 n. 62 (2023): Princípios: Revista de Filosofia (UFRN)
1983-2109
0104-8694
10.21680/1983-2109.2023v30n62
reponame:Princípios (Natal. Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron:UFRN
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron_str UFRN
institution UFRN
reponame_str Princípios (Natal. Online)
collection Princípios (Natal. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Princípios (Natal. Online) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||principios@cchla.ufrn.br
_version_ 1799769979790295040

Registros relacionados