Functional Discourse Grammar and acquisitional adequacy
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista odisséia |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/13182 |
Resumo: | This article explores the compatibility of Functional Discourse Grammar with Tomasello’s (2003; 2008) Social-Pragmatic theory of language acquisition. Section 1 follows Boland (1999, 2006) and others who have claimed that theories of language should be constructed in such a way that they are compatible with what is known about the process of first language acquisition. In section 2, I will briefly explore the main approaches to the study of language acquisition in current linguistics and I will claim that a functional theory of language should preferably be compatible with a constructivist approach, given the paramount role they confer on social, communicative and cultural factors in language acquisition. The paper will then concentrate on examining the compatibility of FDG with Tomasello’s (2003, 2008) theory of language acquisition. My conclusion will be that many aspects of the internal architecture of FDG and the analytical tools employed in the model find direct correlate in Tomasello’s work and thus FDG seems to be in an excellent position to meet Boland’s standard of acquisitional adequacy. |
id |
UFRN-7_1f02c2e5aa5d9d0b47ba600297fca7b3 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/13182 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRN-7 |
network_name_str |
Revista odisséia |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Functional Discourse Grammar and acquisitional adequacyFunctional Discourse Grammar. Social-Pragmatic theory. Language acquisition.This article explores the compatibility of Functional Discourse Grammar with Tomasello’s (2003; 2008) Social-Pragmatic theory of language acquisition. Section 1 follows Boland (1999, 2006) and others who have claimed that theories of language should be constructed in such a way that they are compatible with what is known about the process of first language acquisition. In section 2, I will briefly explore the main approaches to the study of language acquisition in current linguistics and I will claim that a functional theory of language should preferably be compatible with a constructivist approach, given the paramount role they confer on social, communicative and cultural factors in language acquisition. The paper will then concentrate on examining the compatibility of FDG with Tomasello’s (2003, 2008) theory of language acquisition. My conclusion will be that many aspects of the internal architecture of FDG and the analytical tools employed in the model find direct correlate in Tomasello’s work and thus FDG seems to be in an excellent position to meet Boland’s standard of acquisitional adequacy.UFRN2017-12-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/1318210.21680/1983-2435.2017v2n0ID13182Odisseia; Vol. 2 (2017): Número especial; p. 42 - 57Revue Odisseia; Vol. 2 (2017): Número especial; p. 42 - 57Revista Odisseia; v. 2 (2017): Número especial; p. 42 - 571983-243510.21680/1983-2435.2017v2n0reponame:Revista odisséiainstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNporhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/13182/9015Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Odisseiainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVelasco, Daniel García2019-06-05T23:44:44Zoai:periodicos.ufrn.br:article/13182Revistahttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/indexPUBhttps://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/oai||revistaodisseia2016@gmail.com1983-24351983-2435opendoar:2019-06-05T23:44:44Revista odisséia - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Functional Discourse Grammar and acquisitional adequacy |
title |
Functional Discourse Grammar and acquisitional adequacy |
spellingShingle |
Functional Discourse Grammar and acquisitional adequacy Velasco, Daniel García Functional Discourse Grammar. Social-Pragmatic theory. Language acquisition. |
title_short |
Functional Discourse Grammar and acquisitional adequacy |
title_full |
Functional Discourse Grammar and acquisitional adequacy |
title_fullStr |
Functional Discourse Grammar and acquisitional adequacy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Functional Discourse Grammar and acquisitional adequacy |
title_sort |
Functional Discourse Grammar and acquisitional adequacy |
author |
Velasco, Daniel García |
author_facet |
Velasco, Daniel García |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Velasco, Daniel García |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Functional Discourse Grammar. Social-Pragmatic theory. Language acquisition. |
topic |
Functional Discourse Grammar. Social-Pragmatic theory. Language acquisition. |
description |
This article explores the compatibility of Functional Discourse Grammar with Tomasello’s (2003; 2008) Social-Pragmatic theory of language acquisition. Section 1 follows Boland (1999, 2006) and others who have claimed that theories of language should be constructed in such a way that they are compatible with what is known about the process of first language acquisition. In section 2, I will briefly explore the main approaches to the study of language acquisition in current linguistics and I will claim that a functional theory of language should preferably be compatible with a constructivist approach, given the paramount role they confer on social, communicative and cultural factors in language acquisition. The paper will then concentrate on examining the compatibility of FDG with Tomasello’s (2003, 2008) theory of language acquisition. My conclusion will be that many aspects of the internal architecture of FDG and the analytical tools employed in the model find direct correlate in Tomasello’s work and thus FDG seems to be in an excellent position to meet Boland’s standard of acquisitional adequacy. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-20 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/13182 10.21680/1983-2435.2017v2n0ID13182 |
url |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/13182 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.21680/1983-2435.2017v2n0ID13182 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.ufrn.br/odisseia/article/view/13182/9015 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Odisseia info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista Odisseia |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRN |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
UFRN |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Odisseia; Vol. 2 (2017): Número especial; p. 42 - 57 Revue Odisseia; Vol. 2 (2017): Número especial; p. 42 - 57 Revista Odisseia; v. 2 (2017): Número especial; p. 42 - 57 1983-2435 10.21680/1983-2435.2017v2n0 reponame:Revista odisséia instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) instacron:UFRN |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
instacron_str |
UFRN |
institution |
UFRN |
reponame_str |
Revista odisséia |
collection |
Revista odisséia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista odisséia - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaodisseia2016@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1809282348516114432 |