Comércio internacional e meio ambiente: estímulo à produção sustentável ou mero protecionismo comercial a posição do Brasil em dois casos de litígio

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Luz, Lília Silva
Data de Publicação: 2012
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRN
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/18227
Resumo: The World Trade Organization (WTO) was established in 1994 as a result of the Uruguay Round, and has as its principal aim advocate for the maintenance of free trade between nations. The preamble of its Constitutive Agreement specifically cites as an institution the goal of achieving sustainable development and the pursuit of protecting and preserving the environment, bringing into the sphere of world trade the idea that concern for the environmental cause is not restricted only the group of environmentalists, but rather has entered the economic landscape in a way not only ideological, but also pragmatic. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1947, part of the GATT 1994, contains a device that allows the adoption of trade restrictive measures, provided that such measures aimed at protecting the environment - Article XX. The Settlement Body (DSB) is part of the WTO and acts in dissolving disputes between the countries motivated by trade. It examines two cases where countries have imposed restrictive trade measures with environmental justification. The first case was closed in 1996, with award of damages given to Brazil, on the breakdown of U.S. environmental legislation imposed on imported gasoline from Brazil - and the second, begun in 2005 and closed in 2007, coming out victorious again Brazil is on the import ban on retreaded tires to Brazil. The objective is to answer the question: how the environment is treated in the midst of trade discussions - which is aimed at its protection or its use with economic objectives in disguise? For the preparation of this work, extensive documentary research was undertaken with the virtual site of the WTO to review the entire production of legal cases and subsequent analysis of the key issue for the work, and literature of authors who have studied the tense relationship between trade international environment. The first case, it could be seen that the political movement performed by the U.S. with the aim of achieving acceptable standards of air quality was an institutional effort to ensure the quality of air, and thus would be inappropriate to say that the regulation of gasoline was merely a disguised trade barrier.However, a careful analysis of the implementation and operation of gasoline regulation may reveal intentions disguised trade and U.S. environmental argument did not hold. The weight of this environment was relegated, since there were clearly outside interests to the environmental cause. The second case, it was realized that, despite clear attempts by the EC to promote ecological dumping, send when brought to Brazil, supposedly a country with weaker environmental structure on surveillance, a residue that, pursuant to internal policies, as could not be sent to their own landfills, the Brazilian discourse remained focused on the environmental cause, and this sort there was the existence of disguised trade barriers, but of importance, at least a priori, the discussion of foreign forces on the environment environment because there is no way to legally justify the reversal of the total understanding of the first judging body, the sight of all the arguments presented by Brazil and the nonsubmission of new facts upon appeal. Still, quite heartening to reflect on the role of trade liberalization on the environment in general, because, while they do not reach a definitive conclusion will reveal positions in both directions, both for and against, the that only adds to the discussions and makes this a very fertile topic for future research
id UFRN_73fdab0e32e3c194336d7fb12ec6e901
oai_identifier_str oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/18227
network_acronym_str UFRN
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRN
repository_id_str
spelling Luz, Lília Silvahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/2596660478853452http://lattes.cnpq.br/0105245515649663Mendonça, Fabiano André de Souzahttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3456431841933671Santos, Antônio Carlos doshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/8227933586403761Alves, Daniel Durante Pereira2014-12-17T15:54:59Z2012-12-032014-12-17T15:54:59Z2012-02-13LUZ, Lília Silva. Comércio internacional e meio ambiente: estímulo à produção sustentável ou mero protecionismo comercial a posição do Brasil em dois casos de litígio. 2012. 100 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Meio Ambiente, Cultura e Desenvolvimento) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2012.https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/18227The World Trade Organization (WTO) was established in 1994 as a result of the Uruguay Round, and has as its principal aim advocate for the maintenance of free trade between nations. The preamble of its Constitutive Agreement specifically cites as an institution the goal of achieving sustainable development and the pursuit of protecting and preserving the environment, bringing into the sphere of world trade the idea that concern for the environmental cause is not restricted only the group of environmentalists, but rather has entered the economic landscape in a way not only ideological, but also pragmatic. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1947, part of the GATT 1994, contains a device that allows the adoption of trade restrictive measures, provided that such measures aimed at protecting the environment - Article XX. The Settlement Body (DSB) is part of the WTO and acts in dissolving disputes between the countries motivated by trade. It examines two cases where countries have imposed restrictive trade measures with environmental justification. The first case was closed in 1996, with award of damages given to Brazil, on the breakdown of U.S. environmental legislation imposed on imported gasoline from Brazil - and the second, begun in 2005 and closed in 2007, coming out victorious again Brazil is on the import ban on retreaded tires to Brazil. The objective is to answer the question: how the environment is treated in the midst of trade discussions - which is aimed at its protection or its use with economic objectives in disguise? For the preparation of this work, extensive documentary research was undertaken with the virtual site of the WTO to review the entire production of legal cases and subsequent analysis of the key issue for the work, and literature of authors who have studied the tense relationship between trade international environment. The first case, it could be seen that the political movement performed by the U.S. with the aim of achieving acceptable standards of air quality was an institutional effort to ensure the quality of air, and thus would be inappropriate to say that the regulation of gasoline was merely a disguised trade barrier.However, a careful analysis of the implementation and operation of gasoline regulation may reveal intentions disguised trade and U.S. environmental argument did not hold. The weight of this environment was relegated, since there were clearly outside interests to the environmental cause. The second case, it was realized that, despite clear attempts by the EC to promote ecological dumping, send when brought to Brazil, supposedly a country with weaker environmental structure on surveillance, a residue that, pursuant to internal policies, as could not be sent to their own landfills, the Brazilian discourse remained focused on the environmental cause, and this sort there was the existence of disguised trade barriers, but of importance, at least a priori, the discussion of foreign forces on the environment environment because there is no way to legally justify the reversal of the total understanding of the first judging body, the sight of all the arguments presented by Brazil and the nonsubmission of new facts upon appeal. Still, quite heartening to reflect on the role of trade liberalization on the environment in general, because, while they do not reach a definitive conclusion will reveal positions in both directions, both for and against, the that only adds to the discussions and makes this a very fertile topic for future researchA Organização Mundial do Comércio (OMC) foi criada em 1994, como resultado da Rodada Uruguai, e tem como escopo principal propugnar pela manutenção do livre-comércio entre as nações. O preâmbulo do seu Acordo Constitutivo cita especificamente como sendo um objetivo da instituição o alcance de um desenvolvimento sustentável e a busca pela proteção e preservação do meio ambiente, trazendo para a esfera do comércio mundial a ideia de que a preocupação com a causa ambiental não está restrita apenas ao grupo dos ambientalistas, mas, pelo contrário já adentrou o cenário econômico de uma forma não só ideológica, porém também pragmática. O Acordo Geral de Tarifas e Comércio (GATT) de 1947, que integra o GATT de 1994, contém um dispositivo que permite a adoção de medidas restritivas ao comércio, desde que tais medidas visem a proteção do meio ambiente Artigo XX. O Órgão de Solução de Controvérsias (OSC) integra a OMC e atua na dissolução de controvérsias entre os países motivadas por questões comerciais. Analisam-se dois casos em que países impuseram medidas comerciais restritivas com justificativa ambiental. O primeiro caso foi encerrado em 1996, com ganho de causa dado ao Brasil, relativo à discriminação da legislação ambiental estadunidense imposta à gasolina importada do Brasil e o segundo, iniciado em 2005 e encerrado em 2007, saindo novamente o Brasil vitorioso, é referente à proibição da importação de pneus reformados para o Brasil. Objetiva-se responder à pergunta: como o meio ambiente é tratado em meio a discussões comerciais o que se visa é a sua proteção ou a sua utilização com objetivos econômicos disfarçados? Para a confecção deste trabalho, foi empreendida ampla pesquisa documental junto ao sítio virtual da OMC para avaliação de toda a produção jurídica dos casos e posterior análise da questão-chave para o trabalho, além de pesquisa bibliográfica de autores que estudam a tensa relação entre comércio internacional e meio ambiente. Quanto ao primeiro caso, pôde-se perceber que a movimentação política realizada pelos EUA com o fito de alcançar padrões aceitáveis de qualidade do ar foi um esforço institucional para assegurar a qualidade do ar atmosférico, e, assim, seria inapropriado afirmar que o regulamento da gasolina constituiu meramente um entrave comercial disfarçado. Porém, uma análise cuidadosa da implementação e do funcionamento do regulamento da gasolina pode evidenciar intenções comerciais disfarçadas e o argumento ambiental dos EUA não se sustentou. O peso do meio ambiente neste foi relegado, posto que visivelmente existiam interesses estranhos à causa ambiental. Quanto ao segundo caso, percebeu-se que, apesar das claras tentativas das CE de promover o dumping ecológico, quando intentaram enviar para o Brasil, supostamente um país com estrutura fiscalizatória ambiental mais débil, um resíduo que, por força de diretivas internas, já não podia ser enviado para seus próprios aterros, o discurso brasileiro permaneceu centrado na causa ambiental, e desta sorte não se verificou a existência de barreiras comerciais disfarçadas, e sim, de preponderância, pelo menos a priori, de forças estranhas à discussão sobre o meio ambiente, pois que não há como se justificar juridicamente a reversão total do entendimento do primeiro órgão julgador, à vista de todos os argumentos apresentados pelo Brasil e da não apresentação de fatos novos quando da apelação. Ainda, bastante alvissareira a reflexão sobre o papel da liberalização comercial sobre o meio ambiente de forma geral, pois que, ao passo em que não se chega a uma conclusão definitiva, evidenciamse posições nos dois sentidos, tanto a favor quanto contra, o que só enriquece as discussões e torna este um tema bastante fértil para futuras pesquisasCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superiorapplication/pdfporUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do NortePrograma Regional de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente PRODEMAUFRNBRMeio Ambiente, Cultura e DesenvolvimentoComércio internacionalMeio ambienteProtecionismo comercialEnvironmentInternational tradeTrade protectionismCNPQ::CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIAComércio internacional e meio ambiente: estímulo à produção sustentável ou mero protecionismo comercial a posição do Brasil em dois casos de litígioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRNinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNORIGINALLiliaSL_DISSERT.pdfapplication/pdf1205746https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/18227/1/LiliaSL_DISSERT.pdf2d6f54937aea54d66af1807b0fdb64dfMD51TEXTLiliaSL_DISSERT.pdf.txtLiliaSL_DISSERT.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain228657https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/18227/6/LiliaSL_DISSERT.pdf.txt94cd7944b5f9b4c8814c6312849ded16MD56THUMBNAILLiliaSL_DISSERT.pdf.jpgLiliaSL_DISSERT.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg3782https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/18227/7/LiliaSL_DISSERT.pdf.jpg10be4474dcfb17d3807d6587eed284e8MD57123456789/182272017-11-04 09:02:22.125oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/18227Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttp://repositorio.ufrn.br/oai/opendoar:2017-11-04T12:02:22Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Comércio internacional e meio ambiente: estímulo à produção sustentável ou mero protecionismo comercial a posição do Brasil em dois casos de litígio
title Comércio internacional e meio ambiente: estímulo à produção sustentável ou mero protecionismo comercial a posição do Brasil em dois casos de litígio
spellingShingle Comércio internacional e meio ambiente: estímulo à produção sustentável ou mero protecionismo comercial a posição do Brasil em dois casos de litígio
Luz, Lília Silva
Comércio internacional
Meio ambiente
Protecionismo comercial
Environment
International trade
Trade protectionism
CNPQ::CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA
title_short Comércio internacional e meio ambiente: estímulo à produção sustentável ou mero protecionismo comercial a posição do Brasil em dois casos de litígio
title_full Comércio internacional e meio ambiente: estímulo à produção sustentável ou mero protecionismo comercial a posição do Brasil em dois casos de litígio
title_fullStr Comércio internacional e meio ambiente: estímulo à produção sustentável ou mero protecionismo comercial a posição do Brasil em dois casos de litígio
title_full_unstemmed Comércio internacional e meio ambiente: estímulo à produção sustentável ou mero protecionismo comercial a posição do Brasil em dois casos de litígio
title_sort Comércio internacional e meio ambiente: estímulo à produção sustentável ou mero protecionismo comercial a posição do Brasil em dois casos de litígio
author Luz, Lília Silva
author_facet Luz, Lília Silva
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorID.por.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.authorLattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/2596660478853452
dc.contributor.advisorID.por.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.advisorLattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0105245515649663
dc.contributor.referees1.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Mendonça, Fabiano André de Souza
dc.contributor.referees1ID.por.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.referees1Lattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/3456431841933671
dc.contributor.referees2.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Santos, Antônio Carlos dos
dc.contributor.referees2ID.por.fl_str_mv
dc.contributor.referees2Lattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8227933586403761
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Luz, Lília Silva
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Alves, Daniel Durante Pereira
contributor_str_mv Alves, Daniel Durante Pereira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Comércio internacional
Meio ambiente
Protecionismo comercial
topic Comércio internacional
Meio ambiente
Protecionismo comercial
Environment
International trade
Trade protectionism
CNPQ::CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Environment
International trade
Trade protectionism
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CNPQ::CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS::ECOLOGIA
description The World Trade Organization (WTO) was established in 1994 as a result of the Uruguay Round, and has as its principal aim advocate for the maintenance of free trade between nations. The preamble of its Constitutive Agreement specifically cites as an institution the goal of achieving sustainable development and the pursuit of protecting and preserving the environment, bringing into the sphere of world trade the idea that concern for the environmental cause is not restricted only the group of environmentalists, but rather has entered the economic landscape in a way not only ideological, but also pragmatic. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) 1947, part of the GATT 1994, contains a device that allows the adoption of trade restrictive measures, provided that such measures aimed at protecting the environment - Article XX. The Settlement Body (DSB) is part of the WTO and acts in dissolving disputes between the countries motivated by trade. It examines two cases where countries have imposed restrictive trade measures with environmental justification. The first case was closed in 1996, with award of damages given to Brazil, on the breakdown of U.S. environmental legislation imposed on imported gasoline from Brazil - and the second, begun in 2005 and closed in 2007, coming out victorious again Brazil is on the import ban on retreaded tires to Brazil. The objective is to answer the question: how the environment is treated in the midst of trade discussions - which is aimed at its protection or its use with economic objectives in disguise? For the preparation of this work, extensive documentary research was undertaken with the virtual site of the WTO to review the entire production of legal cases and subsequent analysis of the key issue for the work, and literature of authors who have studied the tense relationship between trade international environment. The first case, it could be seen that the political movement performed by the U.S. with the aim of achieving acceptable standards of air quality was an institutional effort to ensure the quality of air, and thus would be inappropriate to say that the regulation of gasoline was merely a disguised trade barrier.However, a careful analysis of the implementation and operation of gasoline regulation may reveal intentions disguised trade and U.S. environmental argument did not hold. The weight of this environment was relegated, since there were clearly outside interests to the environmental cause. The second case, it was realized that, despite clear attempts by the EC to promote ecological dumping, send when brought to Brazil, supposedly a country with weaker environmental structure on surveillance, a residue that, pursuant to internal policies, as could not be sent to their own landfills, the Brazilian discourse remained focused on the environmental cause, and this sort there was the existence of disguised trade barriers, but of importance, at least a priori, the discussion of foreign forces on the environment environment because there is no way to legally justify the reversal of the total understanding of the first judging body, the sight of all the arguments presented by Brazil and the nonsubmission of new facts upon appeal. Still, quite heartening to reflect on the role of trade liberalization on the environment in general, because, while they do not reach a definitive conclusion will reveal positions in both directions, both for and against, the that only adds to the discussions and makes this a very fertile topic for future research
publishDate 2012
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2012-12-03
2014-12-17T15:54:59Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2012-02-13
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2014-12-17T15:54:59Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv LUZ, Lília Silva. Comércio internacional e meio ambiente: estímulo à produção sustentável ou mero protecionismo comercial a posição do Brasil em dois casos de litígio. 2012. 100 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Meio Ambiente, Cultura e Desenvolvimento) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2012.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/18227
identifier_str_mv LUZ, Lília Silva. Comércio internacional e meio ambiente: estímulo à produção sustentável ou mero protecionismo comercial a posição do Brasil em dois casos de litígio. 2012. 100 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Meio Ambiente, Cultura e Desenvolvimento) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, 2012.
url https://repositorio.ufrn.br/jspui/handle/123456789/18227
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa Regional de Pós-Graduação em Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente PRODEMA
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFRN
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv BR
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Meio Ambiente, Cultura e Desenvolvimento
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron:UFRN
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron_str UFRN
institution UFRN
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRN
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRN
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/18227/1/LiliaSL_DISSERT.pdf
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/18227/6/LiliaSL_DISSERT.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/18227/7/LiliaSL_DISSERT.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 2d6f54937aea54d66af1807b0fdb64df
94cd7944b5f9b4c8814c6312849ded16
10be4474dcfb17d3807d6587eed284e8
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1823686616035622912