Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cavalcanti, Eduardo José Cidade
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Lima, Matheus Seabra Rodrigues, Souza, Gabriel F. de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRN
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/31616
Resumo: Two emissions mitigation systems, as CO2 capture and storage (CCS) and concentrated solar power (CSP) have been investigated to a power plant based on exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses. A base plant of natural gas combined cycle for power production is taken as case study. The CSP technology used is parabolic trough collector (PTC) with two storage tanks. The environmental impact indicator used is the eco-indicator 99. The outcomes indicate that the natural gas heater exchanger should have its exergy destruction reduced to improve the performance of all system. The CCS plant reduced the net power and the PTC plant increased slightly the net power in relation to the base plant. The specific environmental impact of CCS plant was increased and of PTC plant was slightly decreased. The environmental impact of fuel production is the main environmental burden in the environmental performance. Therefore, the PTC system is the best case of mitigation system. Discussions about further improvements have been proposed
id UFRN_9f3dd1f6b37254e5c4efc8b068144ce9
oai_identifier_str oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/31616
network_acronym_str UFRN
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRN
repository_id_str
spelling Cavalcanti, Eduardo José CidadeLima, Matheus Seabra RodriguesSouza, Gabriel F. de2021-03-01T23:50:00Z2021-03-01T23:50:00Z2020-08CAVALCANTI, Eduardo J.C.; LIMA, Matheus S.R.; SOUZA, Gabriel F. de. Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses. Renewable Energy, [S.L.], v. 156, p. 1336-1347, ago. 2020. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960148119318555. Acesso em: 22 dez. 2020.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.153.0960-14811879-0682https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/3161610.1016/j.renene.2019.11.153ElsevierAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessExergoenvironmental analysisEco-indicator 99Solar collectorCarbon capture and storagePower plantComparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: exergetic and exergoenvironmental analysesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleTwo emissions mitigation systems, as CO2 capture and storage (CCS) and concentrated solar power (CSP) have been investigated to a power plant based on exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses. A base plant of natural gas combined cycle for power production is taken as case study. The CSP technology used is parabolic trough collector (PTC) with two storage tanks. The environmental impact indicator used is the eco-indicator 99. The outcomes indicate that the natural gas heater exchanger should have its exergy destruction reduced to improve the performance of all system. The CCS plant reduced the net power and the PTC plant increased slightly the net power in relation to the base plant. The specific environmental impact of CCS plant was increased and of PTC plant was slightly decreased. The environmental impact of fuel production is the main environmental burden in the environmental performance. Therefore, the PTC system is the best case of mitigation system. Discussions about further improvements have been proposedengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRNinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNORIGINALComparisonCarbonCaptureSystem_Cavalcanti_2019.pdfComparisonCarbonCaptureSystem_Cavalcanti_2019.pdfapplication/pdf2655874https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/31616/1/ComparisonCarbonCaptureSystem_Cavalcanti_2019.pdf814e59f73045d3e89b5808d4f059c2bbMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8811https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/31616/2/license_rdfe39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81484https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/31616/3/license.txte9597aa2854d128fd968be5edc8a28d9MD53TEXTComparisonCarbonCaptureSystem_Cavalcanti_2019.pdf.txtComparisonCarbonCaptureSystem_Cavalcanti_2019.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain47460https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/31616/4/ComparisonCarbonCaptureSystem_Cavalcanti_2019.pdf.txtfc25814c4fe3e8a4775e0260d3ba1726MD54THUMBNAILComparisonCarbonCaptureSystem_Cavalcanti_2019.pdf.jpgComparisonCarbonCaptureSystem_Cavalcanti_2019.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg1702https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/31616/5/ComparisonCarbonCaptureSystem_Cavalcanti_2019.pdf.jpg14894ad6f01618c358226171a3f4efe9MD55123456789/316162021-03-07 05:49:06.781oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br: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Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttp://repositorio.ufrn.br/oai/opendoar:2021-03-07T08:49:06Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses
title Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses
spellingShingle Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses
Cavalcanti, Eduardo José Cidade
Exergoenvironmental analysis
Eco-indicator 99
Solar collector
Carbon capture and storage
Power plant
title_short Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses
title_full Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses
title_fullStr Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses
title_sort Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses
author Cavalcanti, Eduardo José Cidade
author_facet Cavalcanti, Eduardo José Cidade
Lima, Matheus Seabra Rodrigues
Souza, Gabriel F. de
author_role author
author2 Lima, Matheus Seabra Rodrigues
Souza, Gabriel F. de
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cavalcanti, Eduardo José Cidade
Lima, Matheus Seabra Rodrigues
Souza, Gabriel F. de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Exergoenvironmental analysis
Eco-indicator 99
Solar collector
Carbon capture and storage
Power plant
topic Exergoenvironmental analysis
Eco-indicator 99
Solar collector
Carbon capture and storage
Power plant
description Two emissions mitigation systems, as CO2 capture and storage (CCS) and concentrated solar power (CSP) have been investigated to a power plant based on exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses. A base plant of natural gas combined cycle for power production is taken as case study. The CSP technology used is parabolic trough collector (PTC) with two storage tanks. The environmental impact indicator used is the eco-indicator 99. The outcomes indicate that the natural gas heater exchanger should have its exergy destruction reduced to improve the performance of all system. The CCS plant reduced the net power and the PTC plant increased slightly the net power in relation to the base plant. The specific environmental impact of CCS plant was increased and of PTC plant was slightly decreased. The environmental impact of fuel production is the main environmental burden in the environmental performance. Therefore, the PTC system is the best case of mitigation system. Discussions about further improvements have been proposed
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020-08
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-03-01T23:50:00Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-03-01T23:50:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv CAVALCANTI, Eduardo J.C.; LIMA, Matheus S.R.; SOUZA, Gabriel F. de. Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses. Renewable Energy, [S.L.], v. 156, p. 1336-1347, ago. 2020. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960148119318555. Acesso em: 22 dez. 2020.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.153.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/31616
dc.identifier.issn.none.fl_str_mv 0960-1481
1879-0682
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.153
identifier_str_mv CAVALCANTI, Eduardo J.C.; LIMA, Matheus S.R.; SOUZA, Gabriel F. de. Comparison of carbon capture system and concentrated solar power in natural gas combined cycle: exergetic and exergoenvironmental analyses. Renewable Energy, [S.L.], v. 156, p. 1336-1347, ago. 2020. Disponível em: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960148119318555. Acesso em: 22 dez. 2020.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.153.
0960-1481
1879-0682
10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.153
url https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/31616
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron:UFRN
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron_str UFRN
institution UFRN
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRN
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRN
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/31616/1/ComparisonCarbonCaptureSystem_Cavalcanti_2019.pdf
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/31616/2/license_rdf
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/31616/3/license.txt
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/31616/4/ComparisonCarbonCaptureSystem_Cavalcanti_2019.pdf.txt
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/31616/5/ComparisonCarbonCaptureSystem_Cavalcanti_2019.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 814e59f73045d3e89b5808d4f059c2bb
e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34
e9597aa2854d128fd968be5edc8a28d9
fc25814c4fe3e8a4775e0260d3ba1726
14894ad6f01618c358226171a3f4efe9
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802117910376742912