Effectiveness of specific stabilization exercise compared with traditional trunk exercise in women with non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Souza, Dyego Leandro Bezerra de
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Molina, Eduard Minobes, Nogués, Maria Rosa, Giralt, Montse, Casajuana, Carme, Roig, Javier Jerez, Romeu, Marta
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFRN
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/54953
http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10304
Resumo: Background. Non-specific low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. The primary physiotherapeutic treatment for LBP is physical exercise, but evidence suggesting a specific exercise as most appropriate for any given case is limited. Objective. To determine if specific stabilization exercise (SSE) is more effective than traditional trunk exercise (TTE) in reducing levels of pain, disability and inflammation in women with non-specific low back pain (LBP). Design. A pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted in Rovira i Virgili University, Catalonia. Methods. Thirty-nine females experiencing non-specific LBP were included in two groups: the TTE program and SSE program, both were conducted by a physiotherapist during twenty sessions. The primary outcome was pain intensity (10-cm Visual Analogue Scale). Secondary outcomes were disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), and inflammation (IL-6 and TNF-α plasma levels). Measurements were taken at baseline, at half intervention, at post-intervention, and a month later. Results. Mean group differences in change from baseline to post-intervention for TTE were: −4.5 points (CI 3.3 to 5.6) for pain, −5.1 points (CI 3.0 to 7.3) for disability, 0.19 pg/mL (95% CI [−1.6–1.2]) for IL-6 levels, and 46.2 pg/mL (CI 13.0 to 85.3) for TNF-α levels. For SSE, differences were: −4.3 points (CI 3.1 to 5.6) for pain, −6.1 points (CI 3.7 to 8.6) for disability, 1.1 pg/mL (CI 0.0 to 2.1) for IL-6 levels , and 12.8 pg/mL (95% CI [−42.3–16.7]) for TNF-α levels. There were an insignificant effect size and no statistically significant overall mean differences between both groups. Conclusion. This study suggests that both interventions (traditional trunk and specific stabilization exercises) are effective in reducing pain and disability in non-specific LBP patients, but the two programs produce different degrees of inflammation change
id UFRN_b9c2901433341d3125ce68f8e96f2701
oai_identifier_str oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/54953
network_acronym_str UFRN
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRN
repository_id_str
spelling Souza, Dyego Leandro Bezerra deMolina, Eduard MinobesNogués, Maria RosaGiralt, MontseCasajuana, CarmeRoig, Javier JerezRomeu, Martahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-8426-31202023-10-09T19:57:18Z2023-10-09T19:57:18Z2020SOUZA, Dyego Leandro Bezerra de; MINOBES-MOLINA, Eduard; NOGUÉS, Maria Rosa; GIRALT, Montse; CASAJUANA, Carme; JEREZ-ROIG, Javier; ROMEU, Marta. Effectiveness of specific stabilization exercise compared with traditional trunk exercise in women with non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Peerj, [S.L.], v. 8, p. 10304, 27 nov. 2020. PeerJ. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10304. Disponível em: https://peerj.com/articles/10304/. Acesso em: 08 set. 2023.https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/54953http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10304PeerjAttribution 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessnon-specific low back painstabilization exerciseandomized controlled trialwomenEffectiveness of specific stabilization exercise compared with traditional trunk exercise in women with non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trialinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleBackground. Non-specific low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. The primary physiotherapeutic treatment for LBP is physical exercise, but evidence suggesting a specific exercise as most appropriate for any given case is limited. Objective. To determine if specific stabilization exercise (SSE) is more effective than traditional trunk exercise (TTE) in reducing levels of pain, disability and inflammation in women with non-specific low back pain (LBP). Design. A pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted in Rovira i Virgili University, Catalonia. Methods. Thirty-nine females experiencing non-specific LBP were included in two groups: the TTE program and SSE program, both were conducted by a physiotherapist during twenty sessions. The primary outcome was pain intensity (10-cm Visual Analogue Scale). Secondary outcomes were disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), and inflammation (IL-6 and TNF-α plasma levels). Measurements were taken at baseline, at half intervention, at post-intervention, and a month later. Results. Mean group differences in change from baseline to post-intervention for TTE were: −4.5 points (CI 3.3 to 5.6) for pain, −5.1 points (CI 3.0 to 7.3) for disability, 0.19 pg/mL (95% CI [−1.6–1.2]) for IL-6 levels, and 46.2 pg/mL (CI 13.0 to 85.3) for TNF-α levels. For SSE, differences were: −4.3 points (CI 3.1 to 5.6) for pain, −6.1 points (CI 3.7 to 8.6) for disability, 1.1 pg/mL (CI 0.0 to 2.1) for IL-6 levels , and 12.8 pg/mL (95% CI [−42.3–16.7]) for TNF-α levels. There were an insignificant effect size and no statistically significant overall mean differences between both groups. Conclusion. This study suggests that both interventions (traditional trunk and specific stabilization exercises) are effective in reducing pain and disability in non-specific LBP patients, but the two programs produce different degrees of inflammation changeengreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRNinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)instacron:UFRNORIGINALEffectivenessSpecificStabilization_Souza_2020.pdfEffectivenessSpecificStabilization_Souza_2020.pdfapplication/pdf893868https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/54953/1/EffectivenessSpecificStabilization_Souza_2020.pdfa1b580aa4272aa37ec46d7f8c03f68daMD51CC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8914https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/54953/2/license_rdf4d2950bda3d176f570a9f8b328dfbbefMD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-81484https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/54953/3/license.txte9597aa2854d128fd968be5edc8a28d9MD53123456789/549532023-10-09 16:57:19.534oai:https://repositorio.ufrn.br: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Repositório de PublicaçõesPUBhttp://repositorio.ufrn.br/oai/opendoar:2023-10-09T19:57:19Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Effectiveness of specific stabilization exercise compared with traditional trunk exercise in women with non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title Effectiveness of specific stabilization exercise compared with traditional trunk exercise in women with non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial
spellingShingle Effectiveness of specific stabilization exercise compared with traditional trunk exercise in women with non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial
Souza, Dyego Leandro Bezerra de
non-specific low back pain
stabilization exercise
andomized controlled trial
women
title_short Effectiveness of specific stabilization exercise compared with traditional trunk exercise in women with non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_full Effectiveness of specific stabilization exercise compared with traditional trunk exercise in women with non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effectiveness of specific stabilization exercise compared with traditional trunk exercise in women with non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of specific stabilization exercise compared with traditional trunk exercise in women with non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial
title_sort Effectiveness of specific stabilization exercise compared with traditional trunk exercise in women with non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial
author Souza, Dyego Leandro Bezerra de
author_facet Souza, Dyego Leandro Bezerra de
Molina, Eduard Minobes
Nogués, Maria Rosa
Giralt, Montse
Casajuana, Carme
Roig, Javier Jerez
Romeu, Marta
author_role author
author2 Molina, Eduard Minobes
Nogués, Maria Rosa
Giralt, Montse
Casajuana, Carme
Roig, Javier Jerez
Romeu, Marta
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.authorID.pt_BR.fl_str_mv https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8426-3120
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souza, Dyego Leandro Bezerra de
Molina, Eduard Minobes
Nogués, Maria Rosa
Giralt, Montse
Casajuana, Carme
Roig, Javier Jerez
Romeu, Marta
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv non-specific low back pain
stabilization exercise
andomized controlled trial
women
topic non-specific low back pain
stabilization exercise
andomized controlled trial
women
description Background. Non-specific low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. The primary physiotherapeutic treatment for LBP is physical exercise, but evidence suggesting a specific exercise as most appropriate for any given case is limited. Objective. To determine if specific stabilization exercise (SSE) is more effective than traditional trunk exercise (TTE) in reducing levels of pain, disability and inflammation in women with non-specific low back pain (LBP). Design. A pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted in Rovira i Virgili University, Catalonia. Methods. Thirty-nine females experiencing non-specific LBP were included in two groups: the TTE program and SSE program, both were conducted by a physiotherapist during twenty sessions. The primary outcome was pain intensity (10-cm Visual Analogue Scale). Secondary outcomes were disability (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), and inflammation (IL-6 and TNF-α plasma levels). Measurements were taken at baseline, at half intervention, at post-intervention, and a month later. Results. Mean group differences in change from baseline to post-intervention for TTE were: −4.5 points (CI 3.3 to 5.6) for pain, −5.1 points (CI 3.0 to 7.3) for disability, 0.19 pg/mL (95% CI [−1.6–1.2]) for IL-6 levels, and 46.2 pg/mL (CI 13.0 to 85.3) for TNF-α levels. For SSE, differences were: −4.3 points (CI 3.1 to 5.6) for pain, −6.1 points (CI 3.7 to 8.6) for disability, 1.1 pg/mL (CI 0.0 to 2.1) for IL-6 levels , and 12.8 pg/mL (95% CI [−42.3–16.7]) for TNF-α levels. There were an insignificant effect size and no statistically significant overall mean differences between both groups. Conclusion. This study suggests that both interventions (traditional trunk and specific stabilization exercises) are effective in reducing pain and disability in non-specific LBP patients, but the two programs produce different degrees of inflammation change
publishDate 2020
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2020
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2023-10-09T19:57:18Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2023-10-09T19:57:18Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv SOUZA, Dyego Leandro Bezerra de; MINOBES-MOLINA, Eduard; NOGUÉS, Maria Rosa; GIRALT, Montse; CASAJUANA, Carme; JEREZ-ROIG, Javier; ROMEU, Marta. Effectiveness of specific stabilization exercise compared with traditional trunk exercise in women with non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Peerj, [S.L.], v. 8, p. 10304, 27 nov. 2020. PeerJ. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10304. Disponível em: https://peerj.com/articles/10304/. Acesso em: 08 set. 2023.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/54953
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10304
identifier_str_mv SOUZA, Dyego Leandro Bezerra de; MINOBES-MOLINA, Eduard; NOGUÉS, Maria Rosa; GIRALT, Montse; CASAJUANA, Carme; JEREZ-ROIG, Javier; ROMEU, Marta. Effectiveness of specific stabilization exercise compared with traditional trunk exercise in women with non-specific low back pain: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Peerj, [S.L.], v. 8, p. 10304, 27 nov. 2020. PeerJ. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10304. Disponível em: https://peerj.com/articles/10304/. Acesso em: 08 set. 2023.
url https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/54953
http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10304
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Peerj
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Peerj
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron:UFRN
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
instacron_str UFRN
institution UFRN
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRN
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRN
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/54953/1/EffectivenessSpecificStabilization_Souza_2020.pdf
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/54953/2/license_rdf
https://repositorio.ufrn.br/bitstream/123456789/54953/3/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv a1b580aa4272aa37ec46d7f8c03f68da
4d2950bda3d176f570a9f8b328dfbbef
e9597aa2854d128fd968be5edc8a28d9
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRN - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1802117500754722816