Use of organic acid blends to control spread of salmonella heidelberg in broilers
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/2179 |
Resumo: | The objective was to evaluate an organic acid blend supplied via water and feed to control the spread of Salmonella Heidelberg in broilers from 1-31 days of age. The design was a complete randomized block with five treatments and five replicates, 25 experimental units (13 birds per unit, density of 13 birds/m2). 325 one day old female chicks were randomly arranged in five treatments: T1 - Negative Control (no acids + 0,5 ml of physiological solution in water); T2 - Positive control (no acids + 0,5 ml of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.206 CFU) in water); T3 - Via Acid water (inoculation of 0,5 ml of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.206 CFU) in water); T4 - Infeed Acid (inoculation of 0,5 ml of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.206 CFU) in feed); T5 - Acid via water and feed (inoculation of 0,5 ml of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.206 CFU)). The results were analyzed using Bayesian comparisons with 5% of significance and a priori beta distribution. Significant effects of treatments were found on feed conversion at 21, 28 and 31 days, treatment T3 had the best results. Regarding live weight, significant effects at 14, 21, 28 and 31 days were observed in T3, greater than others. The blend of organic acids has shown its numerical effectiveness in reducing the incidence of Salmonella Heidelberg among the treated groups in intestines pool at nine days, drag swab at 16 days and in wattle collection at 31 days. There were no significant differences between the treated groups and control groups. |
id |
UFRPE-2_2710909c180ed2607b7e4110cee05b64 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.10.0.7.8:article/2179 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRPE-2 |
network_name_str |
Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Use of organic acid blends to control spread of salmonella heidelberg in broilersUse of an organic acid blend to control the spread of Salmonella Heidelberg and improve broiler performanceanimal healthbroiler performancefood safetyDisease controlBroiler performanceFood safetyThe objective was to evaluate an organic acid blend supplied via water and feed to control the spread of Salmonella Heidelberg in broilers from 1-31 days of age. The design was a complete randomized block with five treatments and five replicates, 25 experimental units (13 birds per unit, density of 13 birds/m2). 325 one day old female chicks were randomly arranged in five treatments: T1 - Negative Control (no acids + 0,5 ml of physiological solution in water); T2 - Positive control (no acids + 0,5 ml of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.206 CFU) in water); T3 - Via Acid water (inoculation of 0,5 ml of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.206 CFU) in water); T4 - Infeed Acid (inoculation of 0,5 ml of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.206 CFU) in feed); T5 - Acid via water and feed (inoculation of 0,5 ml of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.206 CFU)). The results were analyzed using Bayesian comparisons with 5% of significance and a priori beta distribution. Significant effects of treatments were found on feed conversion at 21, 28 and 31 days, treatment T3 had the best results. Regarding live weight, significant effects at 14, 21, 28 and 31 days were observed in T3, greater than others. The blend of organic acids has shown its numerical effectiveness in reducing the incidence of Salmonella Heidelberg among the treated groups in intestines pool at nine days, drag swab at 16 days and in wattle collection at 31 days. There were no significant differences between the treated groups and control groups. The objective was to evaluate an organic acid blend supplied via water and feed to control the spread of Salmonella Heidelberg in broilers from 1–31 days of age, and improve growth performance in broilers. The design was a complete randomized block with five treatments and five replicates, 25 experimental units (13 birds per unit, density of 13 birds/m2). A total of 325 one day old female chicks were randomly arranged in five treatments: T1 – Negative control (no acid blend via water and feed + 0.5 mL of physiological solution in water); T2 – Positive control (no acid blend via water and feed + inoculation of 0.5 mL of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.2 x 106 CFU); T3 – Acid blend via water + inoculation of 0.5 mL of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.2 x 106 CFU); T4 – Acid blend via feed + inoculation of 0.5 mL of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.2 x 106 CFU); T5 – Acid blend both via water and feed + inoculation of 0.5 mL of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.2 x 106 CFU) in drinking water and feed. The results were analyzed using Bayesian comparisons with 5% significance and a priori beta distribution. Significant effects of treatments were found on feed conversion at 21, 28, and 31 days, where treatments T3 and T5 had the best results. Regarding live weight, no significant effects were observed between treatments. There was no significant effect of using a mixture of organic acids in reducing the incidence of Salmonella Heidelberg among the treated groups, in intestines at nine days, using drag swab at 16 days, and crop collection at 31 days. There were no significant differences between the test groups and control groups.MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA2022-04-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/217910.26605/medvet-v16n1-2179Medicina Veterinária; v. 16 n. 1 (2022): Medicina Veterinária (UFRPE); 49-582675-66171809-467810.26605/medvet-v16n1reponame:Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online)instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)instacron:UFRPEenghttps://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/2179/482484594Copyright (c) 2022 Medicina Veterinária (UFRPE)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSausen, LourençoSignor Mendes, AngélicaRefatti Sikorski, RosanaUliana, Rosiane de FátimaFerreira Zago, Cláudia HelenaTrevisan, Lucas RenatoEvangelista Guimarães, Bruno2022-04-06T21:45:10Zoai:ojs.10.0.7.8:article/2179Revistahttps://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/PUBhttps://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/oairevmedvet@ufrpe.br1809-46782675-6617opendoar:2022-04-06T21:45:10Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Use of organic acid blends to control spread of salmonella heidelberg in broilers Use of an organic acid blend to control the spread of Salmonella Heidelberg and improve broiler performance |
title |
Use of organic acid blends to control spread of salmonella heidelberg in broilers |
spellingShingle |
Use of organic acid blends to control spread of salmonella heidelberg in broilers Sausen, Lourenço animal health broiler performance food safety Disease control Broiler performance Food safety |
title_short |
Use of organic acid blends to control spread of salmonella heidelberg in broilers |
title_full |
Use of organic acid blends to control spread of salmonella heidelberg in broilers |
title_fullStr |
Use of organic acid blends to control spread of salmonella heidelberg in broilers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Use of organic acid blends to control spread of salmonella heidelberg in broilers |
title_sort |
Use of organic acid blends to control spread of salmonella heidelberg in broilers |
author |
Sausen, Lourenço |
author_facet |
Sausen, Lourenço Signor Mendes, Angélica Refatti Sikorski, Rosana Uliana, Rosiane de Fátima Ferreira Zago, Cláudia Helena Trevisan, Lucas Renato Evangelista Guimarães, Bruno |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Signor Mendes, Angélica Refatti Sikorski, Rosana Uliana, Rosiane de Fátima Ferreira Zago, Cláudia Helena Trevisan, Lucas Renato Evangelista Guimarães, Bruno |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sausen, Lourenço Signor Mendes, Angélica Refatti Sikorski, Rosana Uliana, Rosiane de Fátima Ferreira Zago, Cláudia Helena Trevisan, Lucas Renato Evangelista Guimarães, Bruno |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
animal health broiler performance food safety Disease control Broiler performance Food safety |
topic |
animal health broiler performance food safety Disease control Broiler performance Food safety |
description |
The objective was to evaluate an organic acid blend supplied via water and feed to control the spread of Salmonella Heidelberg in broilers from 1-31 days of age. The design was a complete randomized block with five treatments and five replicates, 25 experimental units (13 birds per unit, density of 13 birds/m2). 325 one day old female chicks were randomly arranged in five treatments: T1 - Negative Control (no acids + 0,5 ml of physiological solution in water); T2 - Positive control (no acids + 0,5 ml of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.206 CFU) in water); T3 - Via Acid water (inoculation of 0,5 ml of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.206 CFU) in water); T4 - Infeed Acid (inoculation of 0,5 ml of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.206 CFU) in feed); T5 - Acid via water and feed (inoculation of 0,5 ml of Salmonella Heidelberg (1.206 CFU)). The results were analyzed using Bayesian comparisons with 5% of significance and a priori beta distribution. Significant effects of treatments were found on feed conversion at 21, 28 and 31 days, treatment T3 had the best results. Regarding live weight, significant effects at 14, 21, 28 and 31 days were observed in T3, greater than others. The blend of organic acids has shown its numerical effectiveness in reducing the incidence of Salmonella Heidelberg among the treated groups in intestines pool at nine days, drag swab at 16 days and in wattle collection at 31 days. There were no significant differences between the treated groups and control groups. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-04-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/2179 10.26605/medvet-v16n1-2179 |
url |
https://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/2179 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26605/medvet-v16n1-2179 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.journals.ufrpe.br/index.php/medicinaveterinaria/article/view/2179/482484594 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Medicina Veterinária (UFRPE) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Medicina Veterinária (UFRPE) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MEDICINA VETERINÁRIA |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Medicina Veterinária; v. 16 n. 1 (2022): Medicina Veterinária (UFRPE); 49-58 2675-6617 1809-4678 10.26605/medvet-v16n1 reponame:Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) instname:Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) instacron:UFRPE |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
instacron_str |
UFRPE |
institution |
UFRPE |
reponame_str |
Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) |
collection |
Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Medicina Veterinária (Recife. Online) - Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revmedvet@ufrpe.br |
_version_ |
1806552250992033792 |